User-Centered Refinement of a Digital Tool for Tuberculosis Treatment Support: Iterative Mixed Methods Study.

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Sarah Iribarren, Omar Alfonso Aguilar Vidrio, Javier Roberti, Kyle Goodwin, Cristina Chirico, Hugo Telles, Barry Lutz, Fernanda Bornengo, Fernando Rubinstein
{"title":"User-Centered Refinement of a Digital Tool for Tuberculosis Treatment Support: Iterative Mixed Methods Study.","authors":"Sarah Iribarren, Omar Alfonso Aguilar Vidrio, Javier Roberti, Kyle Goodwin, Cristina Chirico, Hugo Telles, Barry Lutz, Fernanda Bornengo, Fernando Rubinstein","doi":"10.2196/76742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the potential of digital adherence technologies to support patient-centered monitoring for tuberculosis (TB), there is limited research on incorporating indirect and direct adherence monitoring or assessing patients' experiences with these technologies. The TB Treatment Support Tools (TB-TST) includes a comprehensive mobile app for patients and health care providers and a direct adherence metabolite test to report and monitor adherence.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This paper describes the iterative refinement process of the TB-TST intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To refine the TB-TST intervention, we used an iterative approach involving multiple embedded mixed methods studies guided by the Information Systems Research framework and Design Thinking Process. Embedded studies included a randomized controlled pilot study, interviews, usability testing, and surveys with patients and experts to inform ongoing refinements. The project consisted of interface evaluation, high-level system design, and iterative redesign.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The TB-TST intervention was refined through 3 iterative phases. In Phase 1, based on feedback from pilot study participants and 4 experts in TB, improvements included an in-app discussion board, submission confirmations, and enhanced account recovery. Cultural adaptation was based on Hofstede's dimensions. Phase 2 involved 4 Directed Research Groups and 19 stakeholders to redesign user flows, simplify reporting, and transition the app to a progressive web app, improving device compatibility. Phase 3 included usability testing cycles with 48 participants (26 patients and 22 health care professionals), yielding high satisfaction scores: patient app Mobile Health App Usability Questionnaire, mean 5.96 (SD 0.46); provider mobile dashboard IT Usability Evaluation Scale scores ranged from 5.83 to 6.23 out of 7, and optimization of interface and dashboard. Refinements included larger icons, streamlined onboarding, symptom summary enhancements, and a new cohort-level adherence graph. These modifications improved navigation, usability, and remote monitoring for patients with TB and providers in preparation for a multisite clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combining multiple methods guided by the Information Systems Research framework and elements of the Design Thinking Process can help researchers and developers leverage the strengths of mixed methods iterative designs to create highly personalized and effective digital health interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":16337,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","volume":"27 ","pages":"e76742"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12309858/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/76742","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite the potential of digital adherence technologies to support patient-centered monitoring for tuberculosis (TB), there is limited research on incorporating indirect and direct adherence monitoring or assessing patients' experiences with these technologies. The TB Treatment Support Tools (TB-TST) includes a comprehensive mobile app for patients and health care providers and a direct adherence metabolite test to report and monitor adherence.

Objective: This paper describes the iterative refinement process of the TB-TST intervention.

Methods: To refine the TB-TST intervention, we used an iterative approach involving multiple embedded mixed methods studies guided by the Information Systems Research framework and Design Thinking Process. Embedded studies included a randomized controlled pilot study, interviews, usability testing, and surveys with patients and experts to inform ongoing refinements. The project consisted of interface evaluation, high-level system design, and iterative redesign.

Results: The TB-TST intervention was refined through 3 iterative phases. In Phase 1, based on feedback from pilot study participants and 4 experts in TB, improvements included an in-app discussion board, submission confirmations, and enhanced account recovery. Cultural adaptation was based on Hofstede's dimensions. Phase 2 involved 4 Directed Research Groups and 19 stakeholders to redesign user flows, simplify reporting, and transition the app to a progressive web app, improving device compatibility. Phase 3 included usability testing cycles with 48 participants (26 patients and 22 health care professionals), yielding high satisfaction scores: patient app Mobile Health App Usability Questionnaire, mean 5.96 (SD 0.46); provider mobile dashboard IT Usability Evaluation Scale scores ranged from 5.83 to 6.23 out of 7, and optimization of interface and dashboard. Refinements included larger icons, streamlined onboarding, symptom summary enhancements, and a new cohort-level adherence graph. These modifications improved navigation, usability, and remote monitoring for patients with TB and providers in preparation for a multisite clinical trial.

Conclusions: Combining multiple methods guided by the Information Systems Research framework and elements of the Design Thinking Process can help researchers and developers leverage the strengths of mixed methods iterative designs to create highly personalized and effective digital health interventions.

以用户为中心的肺结核治疗支持数字工具改进:迭代混合方法研究。
背景:尽管数字依从性技术在支持以患者为中心的结核病监测方面具有潜力,但在纳入间接和直接依从性监测或评估患者对这些技术的体验方面的研究有限。结核病治疗支持工具(TB- tst)包括一个面向患者和卫生保健提供者的综合性移动应用程序,以及用于报告和监测依从性的直接依从性代谢物测试。目的:描述TB-TST干预的迭代细化过程。方法:在信息系统研究框架和设计思维过程的指导下,我们采用了包含多种嵌入式混合方法研究的迭代方法来完善TB-TST干预。嵌入式研究包括随机对照试点研究、访谈、可用性测试以及对患者和专家的调查,以告知正在进行的改进。该项目由界面评估、高级系统设计和迭代重新设计组成。结果:TB-TST干预经过3个迭代阶段完善。在第一阶段,根据试点研究参与者和4名结核病专家的反馈,改进包括应用程序内讨论板、提交确认和加强帐户恢复。文化适应是基于Hofstede的维度。第二阶段涉及4个定向研究小组和19个利益相关者重新设计用户流程,简化报告,并将应用程序转换为渐进式web应用程序,提高设备兼容性。第三阶段包括48个参与者(26名患者和22名医护人员)的可用性测试周期,获得了较高的满意度得分:患者应用程序移动健康应用程序可用性问卷,平均5.96 (SD 0.46);提供商移动仪表板IT可用性评估量表得分从5.83到6.23(满分为7分),界面和仪表板的优化。改进包括更大的图标、简化的入职、症状总结增强和新的队列级依从性图表。这些改进改进了结核病患者和医务人员的导航、可用性和远程监测,为多地点临床试验做准备。结论:结合信息系统研究框架和设计思维过程要素指导的多种方法,可以帮助研究人员和开发人员利用混合方法迭代设计的优势,创建高度个性化和有效的数字卫生干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
5.40%
发文量
654
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR) is a highly respected publication in the field of health informatics and health services. With a founding date in 1999, JMIR has been a pioneer in the field for over two decades. As a leader in the industry, the journal focuses on digital health, data science, health informatics, and emerging technologies for health, medicine, and biomedical research. It is recognized as a top publication in these disciplines, ranking in the first quartile (Q1) by Impact Factor. Notably, JMIR holds the prestigious position of being ranked #1 on Google Scholar within the "Medical Informatics" discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信