Untangling the tangled relationship between cognitive and psychological comorbidities in epilepsy: Bidirectionality and mediation.

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Epilepsia Pub Date : 2025-07-31 DOI:10.1111/epi.18589
Bruce P Hermann, Aaron F Struck, Qirui Zhang, Sam S Javidi, Joseph I Tracy
{"title":"Untangling the tangled relationship between cognitive and psychological comorbidities in epilepsy: Bidirectionality and mediation.","authors":"Bruce P Hermann, Aaron F Struck, Qirui Zhang, Sam S Javidi, Joseph I Tracy","doi":"10.1111/epi.18589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cognitive and psychological abnormalities are known to be frequently occurring complications of the epilepsies, but their patterns of co-occurrence, directions of effect, underlying mechanism(s), and causal pathways remain uncertain. The intent of this investigation was to advance understanding of these issues in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 121 patients with TLE were administered a comprehensive neuropsychological battery, and symptoms of diverse psychological syndromes were assessed with a standardized psychological inventory. The cognitive and psychological data were reduced by factor analysis (FA) to broad- and narrowband indicators that were then examined by partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) to inform the presence, strength, direction, and mediators of cognitive-psychological relationships.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>FA identified overarching metrics of cognition (g) and psychopathology (p) as well as their correlation and underlying factors wherein g contained three indicators (language/memory, perceptual/nonverbal reasoning, information/processing speed) and p contained two indicators (externalizing, internalizing). PLS-SEM demonstrated direct, bidirectional associations between internalizing psychopathology and language/memory, indicating these factors express a strong interdependency. Mediation modeling showed an index of functional brain reserve served to explain this selective, shared influence, as well the relationship between the broader concepts of p and g, indicating origin in a common psychological/cognitive mechanism.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>Neuropsychological and psychological comorbidities of TLE are represented by both broadband and narrowband indicators of clinical and theoretical relevance. These indicators exhibit multidimensionality, multimorbidity, and bidirectionality that point to a shared neurobiological core best expressed and explained by the mediating influence of brain functional reserve.</p>","PeriodicalId":11768,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18589","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Cognitive and psychological abnormalities are known to be frequently occurring complications of the epilepsies, but their patterns of co-occurrence, directions of effect, underlying mechanism(s), and causal pathways remain uncertain. The intent of this investigation was to advance understanding of these issues in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE).

Methods: A total of 121 patients with TLE were administered a comprehensive neuropsychological battery, and symptoms of diverse psychological syndromes were assessed with a standardized psychological inventory. The cognitive and psychological data were reduced by factor analysis (FA) to broad- and narrowband indicators that were then examined by partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) to inform the presence, strength, direction, and mediators of cognitive-psychological relationships.

Results: FA identified overarching metrics of cognition (g) and psychopathology (p) as well as their correlation and underlying factors wherein g contained three indicators (language/memory, perceptual/nonverbal reasoning, information/processing speed) and p contained two indicators (externalizing, internalizing). PLS-SEM demonstrated direct, bidirectional associations between internalizing psychopathology and language/memory, indicating these factors express a strong interdependency. Mediation modeling showed an index of functional brain reserve served to explain this selective, shared influence, as well the relationship between the broader concepts of p and g, indicating origin in a common psychological/cognitive mechanism.

Significance: Neuropsychological and psychological comorbidities of TLE are represented by both broadband and narrowband indicators of clinical and theoretical relevance. These indicators exhibit multidimensionality, multimorbidity, and bidirectionality that point to a shared neurobiological core best expressed and explained by the mediating influence of brain functional reserve.

解开癫痫中认知和心理合并症之间的纠结关系:双向性和调解。
目的:认知和心理异常是癫痫的常见并发症,但其共同发生的模式、作用方向、潜在机制和因果途径尚不清楚。本研究的目的是促进对颞叶癫痫(TLE)患者这些问题的理解。方法:对121例TLE患者进行综合神经心理测试,并采用标准化心理量表对不同心理综合征的症状进行评估。通过因子分析(FA)将认知和心理数据简化为宽窄带指标,然后通过偏最小二乘结构方程模型(PLS-SEM)进行检验,以了解认知-心理关系的存在、强度、方向和中介因素。结果:FA确定了认知(g)和精神病理(p)的总体指标及其相关性和潜在因素,其中g包含三个指标(语言/记忆、知觉/非语言推理、信息/处理速度),p包含两个指标(外化、内化)。PLS-SEM显示,内化精神病理与语言/记忆之间存在直接的双向关联,表明这些因素表现出强烈的相互依赖性。中介模型显示,功能性脑储备指数有助于解释这种选择性的、共享的影响,以及更广泛的p和g概念之间的关系,表明起源于共同的心理/认知机制。意义:TLE的神经心理学和心理合并症是由临床和理论相关的宽频和窄带指标来表示的。这些指标表现出多维性、多病态性和双向性,表明一个共同的神经生物学核心,最好地通过脑功能储备的中介影响来表达和解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epilepsia
Epilepsia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Epilepsia is the leading, authoritative source for innovative clinical and basic science research for all aspects of epilepsy and seizures. In addition, Epilepsia publishes critical reviews, opinion pieces, and guidelines that foster understanding and aim to improve the diagnosis and treatment of people with seizures and epilepsy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信