Investigation of evolutionary fuzzy MPCM machine learning and probabilistic SVM models for Butea monosperma species mapping

IF 4.5 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Payel Mani , Dipanwita Dutta , Anil Kumar
{"title":"Investigation of evolutionary fuzzy MPCM machine learning and probabilistic SVM models for Butea monosperma species mapping","authors":"Payel Mani ,&nbsp;Dipanwita Dutta ,&nbsp;Anil Kumar","doi":"10.1016/j.rsase.2025.101667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accurate identification of plant species at an optimal level of precision remains a major challenge in ecological observations when using conventional classification methods. This study explores the potentiality of multi-temporal datasets with machine learning classifiers for the identification and distribution of Butea monosperma tree species, a native floral species grown in many countries of South and Southeast Asia. For identifying optimum combinations of temporal images the Euclidian distance-based separability analysis was employed on the multi-temporal GCI, MSAVI2 indices database (24 toatal temporal dates). This study uses the fuzzy Modified Possibilistic <em>c-</em>Mean (MPCM) classification method combined with the green chlorophyll (GCl), MSAVI2 temporal index to handle the complexity and uncertainty inherent in the phenological data. Owing to its lesser variance on the testing target species over the other classes, the 21 optimum temporal combinations of GCl images were chosen as a benchmark for comparison of the output with the Probabilistic Support Vector Machine (PSVM) with Radial Basis Function (RBF) kernel approach machine learning classifier which is well known for its ability to handle probabilistic information and high-dimensional data. In this study, a diverse dataset of tree species phenological observations has been employed to evaluate the performance of both classifiers. Key metrices such as overall accuracy and F1-score were utilized for the comparison of different models. The MPCM classifier achieved notable performance, with 92 % overall accuracy and an F1-score of 0.93 when utilizing the 21-temporal GCI database. In contrast, a single-date output resulted in only 65% overall accuracy and an F1-score of 0.74. When compared to PSVM model, which exhibits an F-score of 0.88 and an overall accuracy of 82 %, the utilization of MPCM with combined 21 temporal GCI indices demonstrated superior classification performance. Additionally, this research provides insights into how various evolutionary strategies and algorithms can enhance the classifiers’ adaptability to changing data distributions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53227,"journal":{"name":"Remote Sensing Applications-Society and Environment","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article 101667"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Remote Sensing Applications-Society and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352938525002204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate identification of plant species at an optimal level of precision remains a major challenge in ecological observations when using conventional classification methods. This study explores the potentiality of multi-temporal datasets with machine learning classifiers for the identification and distribution of Butea monosperma tree species, a native floral species grown in many countries of South and Southeast Asia. For identifying optimum combinations of temporal images the Euclidian distance-based separability analysis was employed on the multi-temporal GCI, MSAVI2 indices database (24 toatal temporal dates). This study uses the fuzzy Modified Possibilistic c-Mean (MPCM) classification method combined with the green chlorophyll (GCl), MSAVI2 temporal index to handle the complexity and uncertainty inherent in the phenological data. Owing to its lesser variance on the testing target species over the other classes, the 21 optimum temporal combinations of GCl images were chosen as a benchmark for comparison of the output with the Probabilistic Support Vector Machine (PSVM) with Radial Basis Function (RBF) kernel approach machine learning classifier which is well known for its ability to handle probabilistic information and high-dimensional data. In this study, a diverse dataset of tree species phenological observations has been employed to evaluate the performance of both classifiers. Key metrices such as overall accuracy and F1-score were utilized for the comparison of different models. The MPCM classifier achieved notable performance, with 92 % overall accuracy and an F1-score of 0.93 when utilizing the 21-temporal GCI database. In contrast, a single-date output resulted in only 65% overall accuracy and an F1-score of 0.74. When compared to PSVM model, which exhibits an F-score of 0.88 and an overall accuracy of 82 %, the utilization of MPCM with combined 21 temporal GCI indices demonstrated superior classification performance. Additionally, this research provides insights into how various evolutionary strategies and algorithms can enhance the classifiers’ adaptability to changing data distributions.
进化模糊MPCM机器学习和概率支持向量机模型在Butea单精子物种定位中的研究
在使用传统分类方法进行生态观测时,以最佳精度准确识别植物物种仍然是一个主要挑战。本研究探讨了多时相数据集与机器学习分类器在Butea monosperma树种识别和分布方面的潜力,Butea monosperma树种是一种生长在南亚和东南亚许多国家的原生花卉物种。为了确定时间图像的最佳组合,采用基于欧几里得距离的可分性分析方法对多时段GCI、MSAVI2指数数据库(24个总时间数据)进行分析。本研究采用模糊修正可能性c均值(MPCM)分类方法结合叶绿素(GCl)、MSAVI2时间指数来处理物候数据固有的复杂性和不确定性。由于GCl图像在测试目标物种上的差异小于其他类别,因此选择21个最佳时间组合作为基准,将输出与以处理概率信息和高维数据的能力而闻名的概率支持向量机(PSVM)与径向基函数(RBF)核方法机器学习分类器进行比较。在本研究中,采用了多种树种物候观测数据集来评估这两种分类器的性能。利用总体精度和f1评分等关键指标对不同模型进行比较。MPCM分类器取得了显著的性能,在使用21-temporal GCI数据库时,总体准确率为92%,f1得分为0.93。相比之下,单一日期的输出结果只有65%的总体准确率,f1得分为0.74。与f值为0.88、总体准确率为82%的PSVM模型相比,结合21个时间GCI指数的MPCM模型表现出更好的分类性能。此外,本研究还提供了各种进化策略和算法如何增强分类器对不断变化的数据分布的适应性的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
8.50%
发文量
204
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: The journal ''Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment'' (RSASE) focuses on remote sensing studies that address specific topics with an emphasis on environmental and societal issues - regional / local studies with global significance. Subjects are encouraged to have an interdisciplinary approach and include, but are not limited by: " -Global and climate change studies addressing the impact of increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases, CO2 emission, carbon balance and carbon mitigation, energy system on social and environmental systems -Ecological and environmental issues including biodiversity, ecosystem dynamics, land degradation, atmospheric and water pollution, urban footprint, ecosystem management and natural hazards (e.g. earthquakes, typhoons, floods, landslides) -Natural resource studies including land-use in general, biomass estimation, forests, agricultural land, plantation, soils, coral reefs, wetland and water resources -Agriculture, food production systems and food security outcomes -Socio-economic issues including urban systems, urban growth, public health, epidemics, land-use transition and land use conflicts -Oceanography and coastal zone studies, including sea level rise projections, coastlines changes and the ocean-land interface -Regional challenges for remote sensing application techniques, monitoring and analysis, such as cloud screening and atmospheric correction for tropical regions -Interdisciplinary studies combining remote sensing, household survey data, field measurements and models to address environmental, societal and sustainability issues -Quantitative and qualitative analysis that documents the impact of using remote sensing studies in social, political, environmental or economic systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信