Bridging knowledge gaps in digital forensics using unsupervised explainable AI

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Zainab Khalid , Farkhund Iqbal , Mohd Saqib
{"title":"Bridging knowledge gaps in digital forensics using unsupervised explainable AI","authors":"Zainab Khalid ,&nbsp;Farkhund Iqbal ,&nbsp;Mohd Saqib","doi":"10.1016/j.fsidi.2025.301924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Artificial Intelligence (AI) has found multi-faceted applications in critical sectors including Digital Forensics (DF) which also require eXplainability (XAI) as a non-negotiable for its applicability, such as admissibility of expert evidence in the court of law. The state-of-the-art XAI workflows focus more on utilizing XAI tools for supervised learning. This is in contrast to the fact that unsupervised learning may be practically more relevant in DF and other sectors that largely produce complex and unlabeled data continuously, in considerable volumes. This research study explores the challenges and utility of unsupervised learning-based XAI for DF's complex datasets. A memory forensics-based case scenario is implemented to detect anomalies and cluster obfuscated malware using the Isolation Forest, Autoencoder, K-means, DBSCAN, and Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) unsupervised algorithms on three categorical levels. The CIC MalMemAnalysis-2022 dataset's binary, and multivariate (4, 16) categories are used as a reference to perform clustering. The anomaly detection and clustering results are evaluated using accuracy, confusion matrices and Adjusted Rand Index (ARI) and explained through Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP), using force, waterfall, scatter, summary, and bar plots' local and global explanations. We also explore how some SHAP explanations may be used for dimensionality reduction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48481,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Science International-Digital Investigation","volume":"53 ","pages":"Article 301924"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Science International-Digital Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666281725000630","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has found multi-faceted applications in critical sectors including Digital Forensics (DF) which also require eXplainability (XAI) as a non-negotiable for its applicability, such as admissibility of expert evidence in the court of law. The state-of-the-art XAI workflows focus more on utilizing XAI tools for supervised learning. This is in contrast to the fact that unsupervised learning may be practically more relevant in DF and other sectors that largely produce complex and unlabeled data continuously, in considerable volumes. This research study explores the challenges and utility of unsupervised learning-based XAI for DF's complex datasets. A memory forensics-based case scenario is implemented to detect anomalies and cluster obfuscated malware using the Isolation Forest, Autoencoder, K-means, DBSCAN, and Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) unsupervised algorithms on three categorical levels. The CIC MalMemAnalysis-2022 dataset's binary, and multivariate (4, 16) categories are used as a reference to perform clustering. The anomaly detection and clustering results are evaluated using accuracy, confusion matrices and Adjusted Rand Index (ARI) and explained through Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP), using force, waterfall, scatter, summary, and bar plots' local and global explanations. We also explore how some SHAP explanations may be used for dimensionality reduction.
使用无监督可解释的人工智能弥合数字取证方面的知识差距
人工智能(AI)已经在包括数字取证(DF)在内的关键领域找到了多方面的应用,这些领域也需要可解释性(XAI)作为其适用性的不可协商性,例如法庭上专家证据的可采性。最先进的XAI工作流程更侧重于利用XAI工具进行监督学习。这与无监督学习可能在DF和其他大量连续产生复杂和未标记数据的部门实际上更相关的事实形成鲜明对比。本研究探讨了基于无监督学习的XAI在DF复杂数据集中的挑战和应用。实现了基于内存取证的案例场景,使用隔离森林、自动编码器、K-means、DBSCAN和高斯混合模型(GMM)无监督算法在三个分类级别上检测异常和集群混淆恶意软件。CIC MalMemAnalysis-2022数据集的二元和多元(4,16)类别被用作执行聚类的参考。异常检测和聚类结果使用精度、混淆矩阵和调整兰德指数(ARI)进行评估,并通过Shapley加性解释(SHAP)进行解释,使用力、瀑布、散点、汇总和条形图的局部和全局解释。我们还探讨了如何将一些SHAP解释用于降维。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
76 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信