Feven W Getaneh, Jon F Pennycuff, Hannah Kelly, Haley McCann, Paul Kolm, Robert E Gutman
{"title":"Local Estrogen Adherence: A Prospective Pilot Study.","authors":"Feven W Getaneh, Jon F Pennycuff, Hannah Kelly, Haley McCann, Paul Kolm, Robert E Gutman","doi":"10.1177/15409996251363800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objectives:</i></b> Local estrogen therapy (LET) has many benefits, but little is known regarding adherence and reasons for discontinuation. We aimed to evaluate fill/continuation rates of LET and assess factors associated with not filling/discontinuation. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> Prospective observational study of adult women newly prescribed LET. Participants completed Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory 20 (PFDI-20) and the Day-to-Day Impact of Vaginal Aging (DIVA) at baseline, 3-, 6-, and 12-months from initial prescription. Participants who discontinued LET were queried regarding reason for discontinuation. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 155 participants were included. Mean age was 65 (+/-10) and 57% had private insurance. The most common indications for prescription with LET were atrophic vaginitis 61 (39%) and recurrent urinary tract infection 34 (22%). At baseline, 94% filled initial prescription. Continuation rates were 78%, 90%, and 79% at 3-, 6-, and 12-months, respectively, but 93 (60%) were lost to follow-up over the study period. Common reasons for not starting LET included cost (33%) and concern for side effects (22%). Common reasons for discontinuing were mess of using therapy (19%) and concern for side effects (16%). PFDI-20 and DIVA domain scores except self-concept decreased across all timepoints for all participants with no difference between women who continued versus discontinued LET. Univariate analysis did not find any factors associated with LET discontinuation. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> LET use is associated with improved pelvic floor and vaginal symptoms up to 12 months following initiation. Prospective evaluation was challenging due to high loss to follow-up. A total of 26% discontinued LET over 1 year. Barriers to initiation and discontinuation such as cost, mess, and concern for side effects are potentially modifiable factors that physicians can address to improve adherence.</p>","PeriodicalId":520699,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health (2002)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of women's health (2002)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15409996251363800","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Local estrogen therapy (LET) has many benefits, but little is known regarding adherence and reasons for discontinuation. We aimed to evaluate fill/continuation rates of LET and assess factors associated with not filling/discontinuation. Materials and Methods: Prospective observational study of adult women newly prescribed LET. Participants completed Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory 20 (PFDI-20) and the Day-to-Day Impact of Vaginal Aging (DIVA) at baseline, 3-, 6-, and 12-months from initial prescription. Participants who discontinued LET were queried regarding reason for discontinuation. Results: A total of 155 participants were included. Mean age was 65 (+/-10) and 57% had private insurance. The most common indications for prescription with LET were atrophic vaginitis 61 (39%) and recurrent urinary tract infection 34 (22%). At baseline, 94% filled initial prescription. Continuation rates were 78%, 90%, and 79% at 3-, 6-, and 12-months, respectively, but 93 (60%) were lost to follow-up over the study period. Common reasons for not starting LET included cost (33%) and concern for side effects (22%). Common reasons for discontinuing were mess of using therapy (19%) and concern for side effects (16%). PFDI-20 and DIVA domain scores except self-concept decreased across all timepoints for all participants with no difference between women who continued versus discontinued LET. Univariate analysis did not find any factors associated with LET discontinuation. Conclusions: LET use is associated with improved pelvic floor and vaginal symptoms up to 12 months following initiation. Prospective evaluation was challenging due to high loss to follow-up. A total of 26% discontinued LET over 1 year. Barriers to initiation and discontinuation such as cost, mess, and concern for side effects are potentially modifiable factors that physicians can address to improve adherence.