Local Estrogen Adherence: A Prospective Pilot Study.

Feven W Getaneh, Jon F Pennycuff, Hannah Kelly, Haley McCann, Paul Kolm, Robert E Gutman
{"title":"Local Estrogen Adherence: A Prospective Pilot Study.","authors":"Feven W Getaneh, Jon F Pennycuff, Hannah Kelly, Haley McCann, Paul Kolm, Robert E Gutman","doi":"10.1177/15409996251363800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objectives:</i></b> Local estrogen therapy (LET) has many benefits, but little is known regarding adherence and reasons for discontinuation. We aimed to evaluate fill/continuation rates of LET and assess factors associated with not filling/discontinuation. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> Prospective observational study of adult women newly prescribed LET. Participants completed Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory 20 (PFDI-20) and the Day-to-Day Impact of Vaginal Aging (DIVA) at baseline, 3-, 6-, and 12-months from initial prescription. Participants who discontinued LET were queried regarding reason for discontinuation. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 155 participants were included. Mean age was 65 (+/-10) and 57% had private insurance. The most common indications for prescription with LET were atrophic vaginitis 61 (39%) and recurrent urinary tract infection 34 (22%). At baseline, 94% filled initial prescription. Continuation rates were 78%, 90%, and 79% at 3-, 6-, and 12-months, respectively, but 93 (60%) were lost to follow-up over the study period. Common reasons for not starting LET included cost (33%) and concern for side effects (22%). Common reasons for discontinuing were mess of using therapy (19%) and concern for side effects (16%). PFDI-20 and DIVA domain scores except self-concept decreased across all timepoints for all participants with no difference between women who continued versus discontinued LET. Univariate analysis did not find any factors associated with LET discontinuation. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> LET use is associated with improved pelvic floor and vaginal symptoms up to 12 months following initiation. Prospective evaluation was challenging due to high loss to follow-up. A total of 26% discontinued LET over 1 year. Barriers to initiation and discontinuation such as cost, mess, and concern for side effects are potentially modifiable factors that physicians can address to improve adherence.</p>","PeriodicalId":520699,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health (2002)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of women's health (2002)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15409996251363800","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Local estrogen therapy (LET) has many benefits, but little is known regarding adherence and reasons for discontinuation. We aimed to evaluate fill/continuation rates of LET and assess factors associated with not filling/discontinuation. Materials and Methods: Prospective observational study of adult women newly prescribed LET. Participants completed Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory 20 (PFDI-20) and the Day-to-Day Impact of Vaginal Aging (DIVA) at baseline, 3-, 6-, and 12-months from initial prescription. Participants who discontinued LET were queried regarding reason for discontinuation. Results: A total of 155 participants were included. Mean age was 65 (+/-10) and 57% had private insurance. The most common indications for prescription with LET were atrophic vaginitis 61 (39%) and recurrent urinary tract infection 34 (22%). At baseline, 94% filled initial prescription. Continuation rates were 78%, 90%, and 79% at 3-, 6-, and 12-months, respectively, but 93 (60%) were lost to follow-up over the study period. Common reasons for not starting LET included cost (33%) and concern for side effects (22%). Common reasons for discontinuing were mess of using therapy (19%) and concern for side effects (16%). PFDI-20 and DIVA domain scores except self-concept decreased across all timepoints for all participants with no difference between women who continued versus discontinued LET. Univariate analysis did not find any factors associated with LET discontinuation. Conclusions: LET use is associated with improved pelvic floor and vaginal symptoms up to 12 months following initiation. Prospective evaluation was challenging due to high loss to follow-up. A total of 26% discontinued LET over 1 year. Barriers to initiation and discontinuation such as cost, mess, and concern for side effects are potentially modifiable factors that physicians can address to improve adherence.

局部雌激素依从性:一项前瞻性试点研究。
目的:局部雌激素治疗(LET)有很多好处,但很少知道关于坚持和停药的原因。我们的目的是评估LET的填充/持续率,并评估与不填充/停止相关的因素。材料与方法:对新开LET的成年女性进行前瞻性观察研究。参与者完成盆底窘迫量表20 (PFDI-20)和阴道老化的日常影响(DIVA)在基线,3个月,6个月和12个月的初始处方。停止LET的参与者被询问停止的原因。结果:共纳入155名受试者。平均年龄65岁(±10岁),57%的人有私人保险。LET处方最常见的适应症是萎缩性阴道炎61例(39%)和复发性尿路感染34例(22%)。在基线时,94%的人按初始处方服药。3个月、6个月和12个月的延续率分别为78%、90%和79%,但在研究期间有93例(60%)患者失去随访。不开始LET的常见原因包括费用(33%)和担心副作用(22%)。中断治疗的常见原因是使用治疗混乱(19%)和担心副作用(16%)。除自我概念外,所有参与者的PFDI-20和DIVA域得分在所有时间点上都有所下降,在继续LET和停止LET的女性之间没有差异。单因素分析未发现任何与LET停药相关的因素。结论:LET的使用与盆底和阴道症状的改善相关,持续12个月。由于随访损失高,前瞻性评价具有挑战性。26%的患者在1年内停用LET。开始和停止的障碍,如费用、混乱和对副作用的关注,是医生可以解决的潜在可改变因素,以提高依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信