Han Xiao, Baohui Xiao, Xiaoqian Tan, Qian Tan, Weihua Ye, Jiangyan Wu, Renfei Li, Haibo Mei, Guanghui Zhu, An Yan
{"title":"All-inside physeal bar resection for partial physeal arrest of the distal radius with the aid of an arthroscope and patient-specific instrument.","authors":"Han Xiao, Baohui Xiao, Xiaoqian Tan, Qian Tan, Weihua Ye, Jiangyan Wu, Renfei Li, Haibo Mei, Guanghui Zhu, An Yan","doi":"10.1177/18632521251358639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The premature closure of the epiphysis of the distal radius is an infrequent condition in pediatric patients, often resulting in distal radius deformity. Currently, there is limited literature on its treatment, and controversy exists. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of all-inside physeal bar resection with the aid of an arthroscope and patient-specific instrument.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed the patients who sustained distal radius physeal bar resection under all-inside visualization of the arthroscope with the aid of a patient-specific instrument during 2016-2022. Follow-up was performed for a minimum of 2 years, during which pre-operative and post-operative clinical and radiological parameters were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were six boys and two girls enrolled in this study. Six patients got satisfied results, while two patients didn't benefit from the surgery. The mean pre-operative RAA of the affected side was -11.4° ± 13°, while the post-operative radial articular angle was 3.4° ± 11°. There was a significant difference between them. The mean pre-operative ulnar variance was 7.6 mm ± 6 mm, while the post-operative UV was 3.3 cm ± 8 mm. There was no significant difference between them. The pre-operative modified Mayo Wrist Score was 92 ± 5, while that for post-operative was 96 ± 7.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All-inside physeal bar resection for partial physeal arrest of the distal radius with the aid of an arthroscopy and patient-specific instrument is minimally invasive, accurate, and safe. It should be the one option treatment for the premature closure of the distal radius epiphysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":56060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Childrens Orthopaedics","volume":" ","pages":"321-328"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12301228/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Childrens Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/18632521251358639","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The premature closure of the epiphysis of the distal radius is an infrequent condition in pediatric patients, often resulting in distal radius deformity. Currently, there is limited literature on its treatment, and controversy exists. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of all-inside physeal bar resection with the aid of an arthroscope and patient-specific instrument.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the patients who sustained distal radius physeal bar resection under all-inside visualization of the arthroscope with the aid of a patient-specific instrument during 2016-2022. Follow-up was performed for a minimum of 2 years, during which pre-operative and post-operative clinical and radiological parameters were compared.
Results: There were six boys and two girls enrolled in this study. Six patients got satisfied results, while two patients didn't benefit from the surgery. The mean pre-operative RAA of the affected side was -11.4° ± 13°, while the post-operative radial articular angle was 3.4° ± 11°. There was a significant difference between them. The mean pre-operative ulnar variance was 7.6 mm ± 6 mm, while the post-operative UV was 3.3 cm ± 8 mm. There was no significant difference between them. The pre-operative modified Mayo Wrist Score was 92 ± 5, while that for post-operative was 96 ± 7.
Conclusion: All-inside physeal bar resection for partial physeal arrest of the distal radius with the aid of an arthroscopy and patient-specific instrument is minimally invasive, accurate, and safe. It should be the one option treatment for the premature closure of the distal radius epiphysis.
期刊介绍:
Aims & Scope
The Journal of Children’s Orthopaedics is the official journal of the European Paediatric Orthopaedic Society (EPOS) and is published by The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.
It provides a forum for the advancement of the knowledge and education in paediatric orthopaedics and traumatology across geographical borders. It advocates an increased worldwide involvement in preventing and treating musculoskeletal diseases in children and adolescents.
The journal publishes high quality, peer-reviewed articles that focus on clinical practice, diagnosis and treatment of disorders unique to paediatric orthopaedics, as well as on basic and applied research. It aims to help physicians stay abreast of the latest and ever-changing developments in the field of paediatric orthopaedics and traumatology.
The journal welcomes original contributions submitted exclusively for review to the journal. This continuously published online journal is fully open access and will publish one print issue each year to coincide with the EPOS Annual Congress, featuring the meeting’s abstracts.