Hatice Betigül Meral, Tehran Aliyeva, Eren Toplutaş
{"title":"Evaluating the Educational Value and Content Quality of YouTube Videos on Myasthenia Gravis.","authors":"Hatice Betigül Meral, Tehran Aliyeva, Eren Toplutaş","doi":"10.1002/mus.28490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction/aims: </strong>Although numerous YouTube videos on myasthenia gravis (MG) are available, the educational quality and comprehensiveness of this digital health information have not been assessed. This study addresses that gap using structured scoring tools to evaluate informational value for both patients and healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search on December 3, 2024, retrieved the top 50 English-language YouTube videos on MG. The videos were assessed using the modified DISCERN scale (1-5), Global Quality Scale (GQS; 1-5), and a custom comprehensiveness checklist (0-5). Descriptive, comparative, and inter-rater analyses were performed. Group comparisons used the Kruskal-Wallis test; associations were analyzed with Spearman's correlation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Substantial agreement was observed (κ = 0.79). The median video duration was 8 min with a median of 53,459 views. The mean DISCERN score was 3.18 (±1.06), indicating moderate quality of treatment-related information; the mean GQS score was 2.88 (±1.02), reflecting moderate overall usefulness and coherence; and the mean comprehensiveness score was 2.78 (±1.11), showing moderate coverage of educational content. Higher comprehensiveness was positively associated with longer duration, more likes, and professional orientation (p < 0.05). The educational content varied: symptoms (84%) and treatments (70%) were commonly covered, whereas rehabilitation (8%) and long-term management (10%) were rarely included.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Although the mean scores indicated moderate quality, significant variability in educational depth was observed. The limited representation of rehabilitation and chronic care content suggests the need for more comprehensive and balanced digital resources on MG.</p>","PeriodicalId":18968,"journal":{"name":"Muscle & Nerve","volume":" ","pages":"1067-1073"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Muscle & Nerve","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.28490","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction/aims: Although numerous YouTube videos on myasthenia gravis (MG) are available, the educational quality and comprehensiveness of this digital health information have not been assessed. This study addresses that gap using structured scoring tools to evaluate informational value for both patients and healthcare professionals.
Methods: A systematic search on December 3, 2024, retrieved the top 50 English-language YouTube videos on MG. The videos were assessed using the modified DISCERN scale (1-5), Global Quality Scale (GQS; 1-5), and a custom comprehensiveness checklist (0-5). Descriptive, comparative, and inter-rater analyses were performed. Group comparisons used the Kruskal-Wallis test; associations were analyzed with Spearman's correlation.
Results: Substantial agreement was observed (κ = 0.79). The median video duration was 8 min with a median of 53,459 views. The mean DISCERN score was 3.18 (±1.06), indicating moderate quality of treatment-related information; the mean GQS score was 2.88 (±1.02), reflecting moderate overall usefulness and coherence; and the mean comprehensiveness score was 2.78 (±1.11), showing moderate coverage of educational content. Higher comprehensiveness was positively associated with longer duration, more likes, and professional orientation (p < 0.05). The educational content varied: symptoms (84%) and treatments (70%) were commonly covered, whereas rehabilitation (8%) and long-term management (10%) were rarely included.
Discussion: Although the mean scores indicated moderate quality, significant variability in educational depth was observed. The limited representation of rehabilitation and chronic care content suggests the need for more comprehensive and balanced digital resources on MG.
期刊介绍:
Muscle & Nerve is an international and interdisciplinary publication of original contributions, in both health and disease, concerning studies of the muscle, the neuromuscular junction, the peripheral motor, sensory and autonomic neurons, and the central nervous system where the behavior of the peripheral nervous system is clarified. Appearing monthly, Muscle & Nerve publishes clinical studies and clinically relevant research reports in the fields of anatomy, biochemistry, cell biology, electrophysiology and electrodiagnosis, epidemiology, genetics, immunology, pathology, pharmacology, physiology, toxicology, and virology. The Journal welcomes articles and reports on basic clinical electrophysiology and electrodiagnosis. We expedite some papers dealing with timely topics to keep up with the fast-moving pace of science, based on the referees'' recommendation.