Postoperative pain profiles and rebound pain following spinal anesthesia compared to general anesthesia: an observational study.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Minerva anestesiologica Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-30 DOI:10.23736/S0375-9393.25.19042-1
Hanns-Christian Dinges, Christian Volberg, Andrea Leibeling, Julian Maul, Philipp Benkhoff, Karl M Meggiolaro, Hinnerk Wulf, Ann-Kristin Schubert
{"title":"Postoperative pain profiles and rebound pain following spinal anesthesia compared to general anesthesia: an observational study.","authors":"Hanns-Christian Dinges, Christian Volberg, Andrea Leibeling, Julian Maul, Philipp Benkhoff, Karl M Meggiolaro, Hinnerk Wulf, Ann-Kristin Schubert","doi":"10.23736/S0375-9393.25.19042-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Excessive pain during nerve block resolution after surgery under regional anesthesia has recently been referred to as rebound pain. The objective of this study was to detect differences in postoperative pain profiles of spinal and general anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center observational cohort study was conducted at University Hospital Marburg from January 2022 until July 2023. Main outcome measures were integrated pain scores (IPS), postoperative pain scores over 24 hours, cumulative morphine equivalents, and incidence of rebound pain according to the clinical definitions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 328 patients scheduled for elective orthopedic, urological or gynecological surgery receiving either spinal or general anesthesia in this study. No statistically significant differences in IPS were observed apart from the PACU interval. Regarding pain scores on the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), we found significantly lower NRS at the PACU, but significantly higher NRS after six hours following orthopedic surgery that was conducted under spinal anesthesia, but not for the other cohorts. The morphine equivalent consumption was very low for the entire study. The incidence for rebound pain according to clinical definitions, was highest for patients in the orthopedic cohort following spinal anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Statistically significant and clinically relevant differences in pain scores were seen in orthopedic and orthopedic patients during the early postoperative period on resolution of spinal anesthesia. While the entity or rebound pain remains unclear, this phenomenon is a relevant problem in some clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":18522,"journal":{"name":"Minerva anestesiologica","volume":" ","pages":"745-756"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva anestesiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0375-9393.25.19042-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Excessive pain during nerve block resolution after surgery under regional anesthesia has recently been referred to as rebound pain. The objective of this study was to detect differences in postoperative pain profiles of spinal and general anesthesia.

Methods: This single-center observational cohort study was conducted at University Hospital Marburg from January 2022 until July 2023. Main outcome measures were integrated pain scores (IPS), postoperative pain scores over 24 hours, cumulative morphine equivalents, and incidence of rebound pain according to the clinical definitions.

Results: We enrolled 328 patients scheduled for elective orthopedic, urological or gynecological surgery receiving either spinal or general anesthesia in this study. No statistically significant differences in IPS were observed apart from the PACU interval. Regarding pain scores on the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), we found significantly lower NRS at the PACU, but significantly higher NRS after six hours following orthopedic surgery that was conducted under spinal anesthesia, but not for the other cohorts. The morphine equivalent consumption was very low for the entire study. The incidence for rebound pain according to clinical definitions, was highest for patients in the orthopedic cohort following spinal anesthesia.

Conclusions: Statistically significant and clinically relevant differences in pain scores were seen in orthopedic and orthopedic patients during the early postoperative period on resolution of spinal anesthesia. While the entity or rebound pain remains unclear, this phenomenon is a relevant problem in some clinical settings.

与全身麻醉相比,脊髓麻醉术后疼痛概况和反弹疼痛:一项观察性研究。
背景:区域麻醉下手术后神经阻滞缓解过程中的过度疼痛最近被称为反跳性疼痛。本研究的目的是检测脊柱麻醉和全身麻醉术后疼痛概况的差异。方法:这项单中心观察队列研究于2022年1月至2023年7月在马尔堡大学医院进行。主要观察指标为综合疼痛评分(IPS)、术后24小时疼痛评分、累积吗啡当量和临床定义的反跳疼痛发生率。结果:在本研究中,我们招募了328名接受脊柱或全身麻醉的择期骨科、泌尿外科或妇科手术患者。除PACU间期外,IPS无统计学差异。关于数值评定量表(NRS)的疼痛评分,我们发现PACU的NRS明显较低,但在脊髓麻醉下进行骨科手术后6小时的NRS明显较高,但其他队列没有。在整个研究中,吗啡当量的消耗量非常低。根据临床定义,在脊柱麻醉后的骨科队列中,反跳疼痛的发生率最高。结论:脊柱麻醉解除后早期骨科与骨科患者疼痛评分差异有统计学意义,且具有临床相关性。虽然实体或反跳痛尚不清楚,这种现象是一个相关的问题,在一些临床设置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerva anestesiologica
Minerva anestesiologica 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
21.90%
发文量
367
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Minerva Anestesiologica is the journal of the Italian National Society of Anaesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation, and Intensive Care. Minerva Anestesiologica publishes scientific papers on Anesthesiology, Intensive care, Analgesia, Perioperative Medicine and related fields. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信