The Role of Telehealth Payment Parity on Recommended Care and Emergency Department Service Utilization Among Workers With Chronic Conditions.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Zhang Zhang, M Kate Bundorf, Qing Gong, Justin G Trogdon, Donna Gilleskie, Sean Y Sylvia
{"title":"The Role of Telehealth Payment Parity on Recommended Care and Emergency Department Service Utilization Among Workers With Chronic Conditions.","authors":"Zhang Zhang, M Kate Bundorf, Qing Gong, Justin G Trogdon, Donna Gilleskie, Sean Y Sylvia","doi":"10.1097/MLR.0000000000002185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>State-level telehealth payment parity, requiring equal payment rates for telehealth and in-person visits, played an important role in ensuring access to telehealth services. The objective of our study is to evaluate how improved access, driven by telehealth payment parity, affected the utilization of disease-specific recommended care management services and emergency department (ED) services among insured patients with chronic conditions.</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong>We adopted a 2-way fixed-effect difference-in-differences approach using the Merative Commercial Claims and Encounters database from 2019 to 2021.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>We focused on insured workers aged 19-64 with pre-existing mental health disorders or cardiometabolic risks (CMRs).</p><p><strong>Measures: </strong>Outcomes include psychotherapy for mental health disorders, preventive care counseling for CMRs, and ED visits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Telehealth payment parity was associated with a significant increase in the number of psychotherapy visits and tele-psychotherapy by 0.221 visits (95% CI: 0.050-0.391) and 0.411 visits (95% CI: 0.003-0.818) per patient per quarter, respectively. The regulation significantly reduced E.D. visits among individuals with mental health disorders by 0.003 visits (95% CI: -0.007 to 0.000) per quarter, a 25% relative decrease compared with the control at preperiod. However, payment parity was not statistically associated with increasing preventive care visits and lowering ED visits among individuals with CMRs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Telehealth payment parity has effectively promoted the adoption of psychotherapy and reduced ED visits among insured workers with mental health disorders. However, it has not significantly improved the uptake of preventive care counseling for individuals with CMRs.</p>","PeriodicalId":18364,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000002185","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: State-level telehealth payment parity, requiring equal payment rates for telehealth and in-person visits, played an important role in ensuring access to telehealth services. The objective of our study is to evaluate how improved access, driven by telehealth payment parity, affected the utilization of disease-specific recommended care management services and emergency department (ED) services among insured patients with chronic conditions.

Research design: We adopted a 2-way fixed-effect difference-in-differences approach using the Merative Commercial Claims and Encounters database from 2019 to 2021.

Subjects: We focused on insured workers aged 19-64 with pre-existing mental health disorders or cardiometabolic risks (CMRs).

Measures: Outcomes include psychotherapy for mental health disorders, preventive care counseling for CMRs, and ED visits.

Results: Telehealth payment parity was associated with a significant increase in the number of psychotherapy visits and tele-psychotherapy by 0.221 visits (95% CI: 0.050-0.391) and 0.411 visits (95% CI: 0.003-0.818) per patient per quarter, respectively. The regulation significantly reduced E.D. visits among individuals with mental health disorders by 0.003 visits (95% CI: -0.007 to 0.000) per quarter, a 25% relative decrease compared with the control at preperiod. However, payment parity was not statistically associated with increasing preventive care visits and lowering ED visits among individuals with CMRs.

Conclusion: Telehealth payment parity has effectively promoted the adoption of psychotherapy and reduced ED visits among insured workers with mental health disorders. However, it has not significantly improved the uptake of preventive care counseling for individuals with CMRs.

远程医疗支付平价对慢性疾病工作者推荐护理和急诊科服务利用的作用。
背景和目的:国家一级的远程保健支付平价,要求远程保健和亲自就诊的支付费率相同,这在确保获得远程保健服务方面发挥了重要作用。本研究的目的是评估在远程医疗支付平价的推动下,改善的可及性如何影响慢性病参保患者对特定疾病推荐护理管理服务和急诊部门(ED)服务的利用。研究设计:我们采用双向固定效应差分法,使用2019年至2021年的Merative商业索赔和遭遇数据库。研究对象:我们关注的是年龄在19-64岁之间、存在精神健康障碍或心脏代谢风险(CMRs)的参保工人。测量:结果包括精神健康障碍的心理治疗,cmr的预防性保健咨询和急诊科就诊。结果:远程医疗支付平价与每位患者每季度心理治疗就诊次数和远程心理治疗就诊次数的显著增加相关,分别为0.221次(95% CI: 0.050-0.391)和0.411次(95% CI: 0.003-0.818)。这项规定显著减少了患有精神健康障碍的个体每季度的E.D.就诊次数,减少了0.003次(95% CI: -0.007至0.000),与前期对照组相比,相对减少了25%。然而,在cmr患者中,支付均等与增加预防保健就诊次数和降低ED就诊次数没有统计学关联。结论:远程医疗支付平价有效地促进了心理治疗的采用,减少了参保职工精神健康障碍患者的急诊就诊。然而,它并没有显著提高个人的预防保健咨询与cmr。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Care
Medical Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
228
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Rated as one of the top ten journals in healthcare administration, Medical Care is devoted to all aspects of the administration and delivery of healthcare. This scholarly journal publishes original, peer-reviewed papers documenting the most current developments in the rapidly changing field of healthcare. This timely journal reports on the findings of original investigations into issues related to the research, planning, organization, financing, provision, and evaluation of health services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信