Influence of intercostal nerve block preemptive analgesia and incisional infiltration anesthesia on postoperative pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Ling Zhao, Yuxin Zhang, Xinde Chen, Chunyuan Zhang
{"title":"Influence of intercostal nerve block preemptive analgesia and incisional infiltration anesthesia on postoperative pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.","authors":"Ling Zhao, Yuxin Zhang, Xinde Chen, Chunyuan Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s00423-025-03816-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study is aiming at analyzing the effects of intercostal nerve block preemptive analgesia and incisional infiltration anesthesia on postoperative pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy were retrospectively selected. According to different anesthesia methods, they were allocated into an intervention group and a control group, with 45 patients in each. The control group received incisional infiltration anesthesia alone, while the intervention group received intercostal nerve block with preemptive anesthesia combined with incisional infiltration. Pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 4, 8, 12, and 24 h postoperatively at rest, and during mobilization at 8, 12, and 24 h. Postoperative analgesia conditions, as well as the operative time, length of hospital stay, time to first ambulation, and awakening time of the two groups, were compared. The incidence of adverse events was also compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intervention group reported lower resting VAS scores at 4, 8, 12, and 24 h and lower movement-related VAS scores at 8, 12, and 24 h (all P < 0.05). The number of cases with VAS ≥ 4 at 4 h, 8 h, 12 h, and 24 h postoperatively in the control group was higher than that in the intervention group (P = 0.020, 0.033, 0.034, 0.019). Moreover, the proportion of patients who did not receive additional tramadol in the intervention group was higher at 4 h, 8 h, 12 h, and 24 h postoperatively [2/13 (15.38%) vs. 2/24 (8.33%); 5/16 (31.25%) vs. 3/28 (10.71%); 7/13 (53.85%) vs. 4/26 (15.38%); 4/10 (40.00%) vs. 3/22 (13.64%)]. There was no significant difference in the operative time between the two groups (P = 0.065). The length of hospital stay, time to first ambulation, and awakening time in the intervention group were all shorter than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The incidence of adverse events did not differ significantly between groups (8.89% vs. 13.33%, P = 0.739).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preemptive analgesia with intercostal nerve block & incisional infiltration anesthesia offers effective pain control in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, reducing the use of postoperative drugs, with a favorable safety profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":"410 1","pages":"233"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12310807/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-025-03816-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study is aiming at analyzing the effects of intercostal nerve block preemptive analgesia and incisional infiltration anesthesia on postoperative pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Methods: Ninety patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy were retrospectively selected. According to different anesthesia methods, they were allocated into an intervention group and a control group, with 45 patients in each. The control group received incisional infiltration anesthesia alone, while the intervention group received intercostal nerve block with preemptive anesthesia combined with incisional infiltration. Pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 4, 8, 12, and 24 h postoperatively at rest, and during mobilization at 8, 12, and 24 h. Postoperative analgesia conditions, as well as the operative time, length of hospital stay, time to first ambulation, and awakening time of the two groups, were compared. The incidence of adverse events was also compared.

Results: The intervention group reported lower resting VAS scores at 4, 8, 12, and 24 h and lower movement-related VAS scores at 8, 12, and 24 h (all P < 0.05). The number of cases with VAS ≥ 4 at 4 h, 8 h, 12 h, and 24 h postoperatively in the control group was higher than that in the intervention group (P = 0.020, 0.033, 0.034, 0.019). Moreover, the proportion of patients who did not receive additional tramadol in the intervention group was higher at 4 h, 8 h, 12 h, and 24 h postoperatively [2/13 (15.38%) vs. 2/24 (8.33%); 5/16 (31.25%) vs. 3/28 (10.71%); 7/13 (53.85%) vs. 4/26 (15.38%); 4/10 (40.00%) vs. 3/22 (13.64%)]. There was no significant difference in the operative time between the two groups (P = 0.065). The length of hospital stay, time to first ambulation, and awakening time in the intervention group were all shorter than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The incidence of adverse events did not differ significantly between groups (8.89% vs. 13.33%, P = 0.739).

Conclusion: Preemptive analgesia with intercostal nerve block & incisional infiltration anesthesia offers effective pain control in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, reducing the use of postoperative drugs, with a favorable safety profile.

肋间神经阻滞和切口浸润麻醉对腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后疼痛的影响。
目的:本研究旨在分析肋间神经阻滞和切口浸润麻醉对腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后疼痛的影响。方法:回顾性分析90例行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者。根据麻醉方式的不同,将其分为干预组和对照组,每组45例。对照组单独行切口浸润麻醉,干预组行肋间神经阻滞先发制人麻醉联合切口浸润。分别于术后休息4、8、12、24 h及活动8、12、24 h采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估疼痛强度。比较两组患者术后镇痛情况、手术时间、住院时间、首次下床时间、觉醒时间。并比较两组不良事件的发生率。结果:干预组4、8、12、24 h静息VAS评分较低,8、12、24 h运动相关VAS评分较低(均P)。结论:肋间神经阻滞+切口浸润麻醉先发制人镇痛能有效控制腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者的疼痛,减少术后药物使用,安全性较好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.70%
发文量
342
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Langenbeck''s Archives of Surgery aims to publish the best results in the field of clinical surgery and basic surgical research. The main focus is on providing the highest level of clinical research and clinically relevant basic research. The journal, published exclusively in English, will provide an international discussion forum for the controlled results of clinical surgery. The majority of published contributions will be original articles reporting on clinical data from general and visceral surgery, while endocrine surgery will also be covered. Papers on basic surgical principles from the fields of traumatology, vascular and thoracic surgery are also welcome. Evidence-based medicine is an important criterion for the acceptance of papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信