Percutaneous anterior pelvic ring fixation in addition to percutaneous posterior pelvic ring fixation decreases postoperative pain and narcotic usage in hospital for LC1 and LC2 injuries.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Pranit Kumaran, Julian Wier, Joseph T Patterson, Jackson Lee, Geoffrey Marecek, Adam Lee, Joshua L Gary
{"title":"Percutaneous anterior pelvic ring fixation in addition to percutaneous posterior pelvic ring fixation decreases postoperative pain and narcotic usage in hospital for LC1 and LC2 injuries.","authors":"Pranit Kumaran, Julian Wier, Joseph T Patterson, Jackson Lee, Geoffrey Marecek, Adam Lee, Joshua L Gary","doi":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000003050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare postoperative pain and opioid requirements between LC1 and LC2 injuries treated with anterior and posterior fixation (AF+PF) vs. posterior fixation (PF) only.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Design: Retrospective review of propensity matched cohorts for sex, age, LC1 vs. LC2, sacral fracture type, and preoperative visual analogue scores (VAS) were created in a 1:1 ratio.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Level 1 Trauma Center and Academic Tertiary Care Hospital.</p><p><strong>Patient selection criteria: </strong>Adult patients with LC1 or LC2 (OTA/AO 61B2.1, 61B2.2) injuries treated surgically with PF or AF+PF between March 2019 through January 2024.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and comparisons: </strong>VAS and morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) were measured at 24 and 48 hours postoperatively, and 24 hours before discharge between the groups. Secondary outcomes included postoperative days to mobilization (DTM) and length of stay (LOS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>56 patients (28 AF+PF, mean age 49.4+16.9, 57.1% female, 28 PF, mean age 49.8+16.9, 53.6% female) were included. There were no differences between the groups for demographic data (all p > 0.78). AF+PF patients had lower VAS scores than PF patients 24 hours postoperatively (Difference in Mean (DIM): 2.18 cm (95%-confidence interval (95-CI): 0.9068 -3.4532), p=0.001), 48 hours postoperatively (DIM: 3.43 cm (95-CI: 2.11 to 4.75), p<0.001), and 24 hours before discharge (DIM: 2.68 (95%-CI: 1.31 to 4.04), p<0.001). AF+PF patients required lower MMEs 24 hours before discharge (DIM: 6.989 (95%-CI: 0.873 to 13.105), p=0.026). AF+PF patients also had shorter DTM (DIM: 3.21 (95-CI: 0.03 to 6.40), p=0.048). There were no differences in MMEs 24 hours postoperatively (DIM: 3.64 (95%-CI: -4.15 to 11.44), p=0.35), 48 hours postoperatively (DIM: 4.78 (9%-5CI: -3.12 to 12.67), p=0.23), or LOS (DIM: 1.96 (95%-CI: -2.03 to 5.95), p=0.33).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Anterior and posterior fixation was associated with significantly decreased inpatient postoperative pain, pre-discharge narcotics use, and days to mobilization compared to posterior fixation alone. The combination of percutaneous anterior and posterior fixation for LC1 and LC2 pelvic ring injuries should be considered when the goals are maximizing pain control.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III.</p>","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000003050","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To compare postoperative pain and opioid requirements between LC1 and LC2 injuries treated with anterior and posterior fixation (AF+PF) vs. posterior fixation (PF) only.

Methods: Design: Retrospective review of propensity matched cohorts for sex, age, LC1 vs. LC2, sacral fracture type, and preoperative visual analogue scores (VAS) were created in a 1:1 ratio.

Setting: Level 1 Trauma Center and Academic Tertiary Care Hospital.

Patient selection criteria: Adult patients with LC1 or LC2 (OTA/AO 61B2.1, 61B2.2) injuries treated surgically with PF or AF+PF between March 2019 through January 2024.

Outcome measures and comparisons: VAS and morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) were measured at 24 and 48 hours postoperatively, and 24 hours before discharge between the groups. Secondary outcomes included postoperative days to mobilization (DTM) and length of stay (LOS).

Results: 56 patients (28 AF+PF, mean age 49.4+16.9, 57.1% female, 28 PF, mean age 49.8+16.9, 53.6% female) were included. There were no differences between the groups for demographic data (all p > 0.78). AF+PF patients had lower VAS scores than PF patients 24 hours postoperatively (Difference in Mean (DIM): 2.18 cm (95%-confidence interval (95-CI): 0.9068 -3.4532), p=0.001), 48 hours postoperatively (DIM: 3.43 cm (95-CI: 2.11 to 4.75), p<0.001), and 24 hours before discharge (DIM: 2.68 (95%-CI: 1.31 to 4.04), p<0.001). AF+PF patients required lower MMEs 24 hours before discharge (DIM: 6.989 (95%-CI: 0.873 to 13.105), p=0.026). AF+PF patients also had shorter DTM (DIM: 3.21 (95-CI: 0.03 to 6.40), p=0.048). There were no differences in MMEs 24 hours postoperatively (DIM: 3.64 (95%-CI: -4.15 to 11.44), p=0.35), 48 hours postoperatively (DIM: 4.78 (9%-5CI: -3.12 to 12.67), p=0.23), or LOS (DIM: 1.96 (95%-CI: -2.03 to 5.95), p=0.33).

Conclusions: Anterior and posterior fixation was associated with significantly decreased inpatient postoperative pain, pre-discharge narcotics use, and days to mobilization compared to posterior fixation alone. The combination of percutaneous anterior and posterior fixation for LC1 and LC2 pelvic ring injuries should be considered when the goals are maximizing pain control.

Level of evidence: III.

经皮盆腔前环固定和经皮盆腔后环固定可减少LC1和LC2损伤的术后疼痛和住院麻醉使用。
目的:比较前后固定(AF+PF)与单纯后路固定(PF)治疗LC1和LC2损伤的术后疼痛和阿片类药物需求。方法:设计:以1:1的比例建立性别、年龄、LC1与LC2、骶骨骨折类型和术前视觉模拟评分(VAS)的倾向匹配队列的回顾性研究。单位:一级创伤中心和三级专科医院。患者选择标准:2019年3月至2024年1月期间接受PF或AF+PF手术治疗的LC1或LC2 (OTA/AO 61B2.1, 61B2.2)损伤的成年患者。结果测量与比较:两组分别在术后24小时、48小时和出院前24小时测量VAS和吗啡毫克当量(MMEs)。次要结局包括术后活动天数(DTM)和住院时间(LOS)。结果:共纳入56例(AF+PF 28例,平均年龄49.4+16.9,女性57.1%;PF 28例,平均年龄49.8+16.9,女性53.6%)。人口学数据组间无差异(均p < 0.78)。AF+PF患者术后24小时(平均差值(DIM): 2.18 cm(95%可信区间(95-CI): 0.9068 -3.4532), p=0.001),术后48小时(DIM: 3.43 cm (95-CI: 2.11 - 4.75))的VAS评分低于PF患者。结论:与单独后路固定相比,前后路固定可显著减少住院患者术后疼痛、出院前麻醉剂使用和活动时间。当目标是最大限度地控制疼痛时,应考虑经皮前后联合固定术治疗LC1和LC2骨盆环损伤。证据水平:III。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma is devoted exclusively to the diagnosis and management of hard and soft tissue trauma, including injuries to bone, muscle, ligament, and tendons, as well as spinal cord injuries. Under the guidance of a distinguished international board of editors, the journal provides the most current information on diagnostic techniques, new and improved surgical instruments and procedures, surgical implants and prosthetic devices, bioplastics and biometals; and physical therapy and rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信