Early Cardiac Rehabilitation for Critically Ill Patients With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 9.7 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Linjing Wu, Jiahua Li, Yamin Zheng, Mengmeng Xue, Wei Yan, Yongbin Sun, Meiling Zhang, Qiaoyan Li, Jiahong Zhang, Ying Jia, Yuli Wang, Yuan Chen, Guangyu Sun, Binbin Liu, Cuilian Dai
{"title":"Early Cardiac Rehabilitation for Critically Ill Patients With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Linjing Wu, Jiahua Li, Yamin Zheng, Mengmeng Xue, Wei Yan, Yongbin Sun, Meiling Zhang, Qiaoyan Li, Jiahong Zhang, Ying Jia, Yuli Wang, Yuan Chen, Guangyu Sun, Binbin Liu, Cuilian Dai","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.24141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The optimal timing and approach for initiating cardiac rehabilitation (CR) in critically ill patients during the acute phase of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effects of CR on physical function and rehospitalization for critically ill patients with ADHF admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU).</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>In this single-center, single-blind randomized clinical trial conducted in China, critically ill patients with severe ADHF admitted to the CICU were recruited between March 26, 2021, and September 1, 2022. All patients were followed up for 6 months, and investigators were blinded to the group assignment.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>After short-term therapy, participants were randomized 1:1 to an early progressive and personalized CR program for patients with ADHF (AHF-CR program) that was administered exclusively during the patients' CICU stay or to usual care.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcomes were Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) score at hospital discharge and 6-month all-cause rehospitalization rates. These outcomes were analyzed using an intention-to-treat approach including all patients after randomization. The Perme Intensive Care Unit Mobility (PERME) score was incorporated as an exploratory outcome during analysis to assess mobility status in critically ill patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 120 patients (mean [SD] age, 68.6 [12.3] years; 80 [66.7%] male). At randomization, pulmonary crackles were observed in 49 patients in the control group (81.7%) and 43 patients in the intervention group (71.7%). Additionally, 62 patients (51.7%) had an arterial partial pressure of oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio below 300 mm Hg. A total of 40 patients (33.3%) received intravenous vasoactive medications, and 87 (72.5%) received intravenous loop diuretics. The median difference in SPPB scores between groups was 1.0 (95% CI, 0-2.0; P = .16), which was not significant. Six-month rehospitalization rates were comparable between the control and intervention groups (16 [26.6%] vs 17 [28.3%]; hazard ratio, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.51-1.99]; P = .99). Exploratory analysis revealed that the intervention group had higher PERME scores, with a median between-group difference of 2.76 (95% CI, 0.77-4.74; adjusted P = .04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this randomized clinical trial of critically ill patients with ADHF, the AHF-CR program did not significantly improve SPPB scores or rehospitalization rates. However, it may offer potential physical benefits, including enhanced mobility.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR2100050151.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"8 7","pages":"e2524141"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12311714/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Network Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.24141","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: The optimal timing and approach for initiating cardiac rehabilitation (CR) in critically ill patients during the acute phase of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) remains uncertain.

Objective: To evaluate the effects of CR on physical function and rehospitalization for critically ill patients with ADHF admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU).

Design, setting, and participants: In this single-center, single-blind randomized clinical trial conducted in China, critically ill patients with severe ADHF admitted to the CICU were recruited between March 26, 2021, and September 1, 2022. All patients were followed up for 6 months, and investigators were blinded to the group assignment.

Interventions: After short-term therapy, participants were randomized 1:1 to an early progressive and personalized CR program for patients with ADHF (AHF-CR program) that was administered exclusively during the patients' CICU stay or to usual care.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcomes were Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) score at hospital discharge and 6-month all-cause rehospitalization rates. These outcomes were analyzed using an intention-to-treat approach including all patients after randomization. The Perme Intensive Care Unit Mobility (PERME) score was incorporated as an exploratory outcome during analysis to assess mobility status in critically ill patients.

Results: This study included 120 patients (mean [SD] age, 68.6 [12.3] years; 80 [66.7%] male). At randomization, pulmonary crackles were observed in 49 patients in the control group (81.7%) and 43 patients in the intervention group (71.7%). Additionally, 62 patients (51.7%) had an arterial partial pressure of oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio below 300 mm Hg. A total of 40 patients (33.3%) received intravenous vasoactive medications, and 87 (72.5%) received intravenous loop diuretics. The median difference in SPPB scores between groups was 1.0 (95% CI, 0-2.0; P = .16), which was not significant. Six-month rehospitalization rates were comparable between the control and intervention groups (16 [26.6%] vs 17 [28.3%]; hazard ratio, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.51-1.99]; P = .99). Exploratory analysis revealed that the intervention group had higher PERME scores, with a median between-group difference of 2.76 (95% CI, 0.77-4.74; adjusted P = .04).

Conclusions and relevance: In this randomized clinical trial of critically ill patients with ADHF, the AHF-CR program did not significantly improve SPPB scores or rehospitalization rates. However, it may offer potential physical benefits, including enhanced mobility.

Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR2100050151.

危重患者急性失代偿性心力衰竭的早期心脏康复:一项随机临床试验
重要性:急性失代偿性心力衰竭(ADHF)急性期危重患者启动心脏康复(CR)的最佳时机和方法仍不确定。目的:探讨CR对心脏重症监护病房(CICU) ADHF危重患者身体功能及再住院的影响。设计、环境和参与者:在中国进行的这项单中心、单盲随机临床试验中,在2021年3月26日至2022年9月1日期间招募了入住CICU的重症ADHF患者。所有患者随访6个月,调查人员对小组分配不知情。干预措施:短期治疗后,参与者被1:1随机分配到ADHF患者的早期进行性和个性化CR计划(AHF-CR计划),该计划仅在患者CICU住院期间或常规护理期间实施。主要结局和措施:主要结局是出院时的短时间体能表现电池(SPPB)评分和6个月全因再住院率。这些结果采用意向治疗方法进行分析,包括随机分组后的所有患者。Perme重症监护病房活动能力(Perme)评分被纳入分析期间的探索性结果,以评估危重患者的活动状况。结果:本研究纳入120例患者(平均[SD]年龄68.6[12.3]岁;男性80例(66.7%)。随机分组时,对照组49例(81.7%),干预组43例(71.7%)出现肺裂纹。此外,62例(51.7%)患者的动脉氧分压与吸入氧分数比低于300 mm Hg。总共40例(33.3%)患者接受静脉血管活性药物治疗,87例(72.5%)患者接受静脉利尿剂治疗。两组SPPB评分中位差为1.0 (95% CI, 0-2.0;P = .16),差异无统计学意义。对照组和干预组6个月再住院率相当(16例[26.6%]vs 17例[28.3%];风险比,1.00 [95% CI, 0.51-1.99];p = .99)。探索性分析显示,干预组PERME评分较高,组间中位数差异为2.76 (95% CI, 0.77-4.74;调整后P = .04)。结论和相关性:在这项针对ADHF危重患者的随机临床试验中,AHF-CR方案并没有显著提高SPPB评分或再住院率。然而,它可能提供潜在的身体好处,包括增强机动性。试验注册:中国临床试验注册号:ChiCTR2100050151。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA Network Open
JAMA Network Open Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
2126
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMA Network Open, a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, stands as an international, peer-reviewed, open-access general medical journal.The publication is dedicated to disseminating research across various health disciplines and countries, encompassing clinical care, innovation in health care, health policy, and global health. JAMA Network Open caters to clinicians, investigators, and policymakers, providing a platform for valuable insights and advancements in the medical field. As part of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Network Open contributes to the collective knowledge and understanding within the medical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信