Population Pharmacokinetic Model Evaluation with a Small Real-World Dataset Versus a Large Virtual Dataset: Does Sample Size Affect Decision-Making?

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Mehdi El Hassani, Daniel J G Thirion, Amélie Marsot
{"title":"Population Pharmacokinetic Model Evaluation with a Small Real-World Dataset Versus a Large Virtual Dataset: Does Sample Size Affect Decision-Making?","authors":"Mehdi El Hassani, Daniel J G Thirion, Amélie Marsot","doi":"10.1007/s13318-025-00960-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>In a recent simulation-based study, we found that sample size had minimal influence on the external evaluation of population pharmacokinetic (PK) models. However, the applicability of these findings to clinical data remains unexplored. This study aims to validate our previous simulation-based results using real-world clinical data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from a prospective clinical study in the > 75-year-old population admitted to the McGill University Health Center (MUHC) receiving piperacillin/tazobactam were collected. A virtual population of 1000 patients representative of the characteristics of MUHC patients was also simulated. A population PK model was externally evaluated both using the small clinical dataset and a larger simulated dataset. The predictive performance of the model was assessed using bias, imprecision, goodness-of-fit plots (GOF), and prediction-corrected visual predictive checks (pcVPC). The distribution of prediction errors between the clinical and simulated datasets was compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 13 patients undergoing piperacillin/tazobactam therapy were collected. The Ishihara et al. model showed low bias (2.4% population, 0.5% individual) and imprecision (23.8% and 3.2%) and was therefore chosen for Monte Carlo simulation of the virtual population. The Hemmersbach-Miller et al. model showed bias values of - 37.8% (population) and - 21.4% (individual), with imprecision values of 43.2% (population) and 31.3% (individual) for the clinical dataset. For the simulated population, bias values were - 28.4% (population) and - 13.9% (individual), with imprecision values of 40.2% (population) and 18.1% (individual). No significant difference was observed between the prediction error distributions of the clinical and simulated datasets. Both GOF plots and pcVPCs showed similar model misspecification across the clinical and simulated datasets.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study confirms that small clinical datasets may be used to externally evaluate population PK models.</p>","PeriodicalId":11939,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics","volume":" ","pages":"441-445"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13318-025-00960-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: In a recent simulation-based study, we found that sample size had minimal influence on the external evaluation of population pharmacokinetic (PK) models. However, the applicability of these findings to clinical data remains unexplored. This study aims to validate our previous simulation-based results using real-world clinical data.

Methods: Data from a prospective clinical study in the > 75-year-old population admitted to the McGill University Health Center (MUHC) receiving piperacillin/tazobactam were collected. A virtual population of 1000 patients representative of the characteristics of MUHC patients was also simulated. A population PK model was externally evaluated both using the small clinical dataset and a larger simulated dataset. The predictive performance of the model was assessed using bias, imprecision, goodness-of-fit plots (GOF), and prediction-corrected visual predictive checks (pcVPC). The distribution of prediction errors between the clinical and simulated datasets was compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test.

Results: Data from 13 patients undergoing piperacillin/tazobactam therapy were collected. The Ishihara et al. model showed low bias (2.4% population, 0.5% individual) and imprecision (23.8% and 3.2%) and was therefore chosen for Monte Carlo simulation of the virtual population. The Hemmersbach-Miller et al. model showed bias values of - 37.8% (population) and - 21.4% (individual), with imprecision values of 43.2% (population) and 31.3% (individual) for the clinical dataset. For the simulated population, bias values were - 28.4% (population) and - 13.9% (individual), with imprecision values of 40.2% (population) and 18.1% (individual). No significant difference was observed between the prediction error distributions of the clinical and simulated datasets. Both GOF plots and pcVPCs showed similar model misspecification across the clinical and simulated datasets.

Conclusions: This study confirms that small clinical datasets may be used to externally evaluate population PK models.

小型真实世界数据集与大型虚拟数据集的群体药代动力学模型评估:样本量是否影响决策?
背景和目的:在最近一项基于模拟的研究中,我们发现样本量对群体药代动力学(PK)模型的外部评价影响最小。然而,这些发现对临床数据的适用性仍未得到探索。本研究旨在利用真实世界的临床数据验证我们之前基于模拟的结果。方法:收集来自麦吉尔大学健康中心(MUHC)接受哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗的bbbb75岁人群的前瞻性临床研究数据。还模拟了代表MUHC患者特征的1000名患者的虚拟人群。使用小型临床数据集和较大的模拟数据集对种群PK模型进行外部评估。使用偏倚、不精确、拟合优度图(GOF)和预测校正视觉预测检查(pcVPC)评估模型的预测性能。使用Wilcoxon秩和检验比较临床和模拟数据集的预测误差分布。结果:收集了13例接受哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗的患者的数据。Ishihara等人的模型显示出低偏差(2.4%总体,0.5%个体)和不精确(23.8%和3.2%),因此被选择用于虚拟种群的蒙特卡罗模拟。Hemmersbach-Miller等人的模型显示,临床数据集的偏倚值为- 37.8%(总体)和- 21.4%(个体),不精确值为43.2%(总体)和31.3%(个体)。对于模拟种群,偏差值为- 28.4%(种群)和- 13.9%(个体),不精确值为40.2%(种群)和18.1%(个体)。临床数据集和模拟数据集的预测误差分布无显著差异。GOF图和pcVPCs在临床和模拟数据集中都显示出类似的模型错误。结论:本研究证实,小型临床数据集可用于外部评估人群PK模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Hepatology International is a peer-reviewed journal featuring articles written by clinicians, clinical researchers and basic scientists is dedicated to research and patient care issues in hepatology. This journal focuses mainly on new and emerging diagnostic and treatment options, protocols and molecular and cellular basis of disease pathogenesis, new technologies, in liver and biliary sciences. Hepatology International publishes original research articles related to clinical care and basic research; review articles; consensus guidelines for diagnosis and treatment; invited editorials, and controversies in contemporary issues. The journal does not publish case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信