Person-centred emergency care: translation and cross-cultural validation of the Australian Emergency Department Patient-Reported Experience Measure (ED PREM) in the Netherlands.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Renée A M Tuinte, Claudia Bull, Job M Hoonhorst, Reinier P Akkermans, Marie Louise Moors, Jaap Ten Oever, Marlies Ejl Hulscher, Jacobien J Hoogerwerf
{"title":"Person-centred emergency care: translation and cross-cultural validation of the Australian Emergency Department Patient-Reported Experience Measure (ED PREM) in the Netherlands.","authors":"Renée A M Tuinte, Claudia Bull, Job M Hoonhorst, Reinier P Akkermans, Marie Louise Moors, Jaap Ten Oever, Marlies Ejl Hulscher, Jacobien J Hoogerwerf","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2024-214536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Measuring and evaluating patient experience in the emergency department (ED) is essential for improving the quality of emergency care. However, specific and validated tools to measure patient experience in the ED are lacking in many countries. The aim of this study was therefore to translate and cross-culturally validate the Australian ED Patient-Reported Experience Measure (ED PREM) for the Dutch setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-centre validation study was conducted in a Dutch academic hospital. Step 1 involved forward and backward translation to produce a Dutch translation of the ED PREM (prototype). Step 2 involved establishing face and content validity of the Dutch prototype through cognitive patient interviews and researcher team consensus meetings. Step 3 involved administering the resultant Dutch pilot ED PREM to an ED population (n=527), to be able to perform psychometric analyses on this sample. Descriptive statistics and item reduction analyses were conducted prior to confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). CFA was used to confirm the structural validity of the Dutch ED PREM, and internal consistency was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The face and content validity of the prototype Dutch ED PREM was 'good' after 15 cognitive interviews and expert consultation. Over two-thirds of participants (357/527) completed the Dutch pilot ED PREM. Scores were high across all four domains. Several items were removed due to high ceiling effects and a large number of 'not applicable' responses. The final 18-item Dutch ED PREM showed acceptable model fit with CFA (χ<sup>2</sup>(df) 7519.55 (153), p<0.001, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation=0.090, Tucker-Lewis Index=0.942, Comparative Fit Index=0.951, Standardised Root Mean Square Residual=0.035). Internal consistency was high (Cronbach's alpha ranged 0.85-0.97 per domain).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The final 18-item Dutch ED PREM showed good validity and reliability for measuring ED patient experience. It is suitable and feasible for use in clinical practice to assess and improve the person-centredness of emergency care.</p>","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2024-214536","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Measuring and evaluating patient experience in the emergency department (ED) is essential for improving the quality of emergency care. However, specific and validated tools to measure patient experience in the ED are lacking in many countries. The aim of this study was therefore to translate and cross-culturally validate the Australian ED Patient-Reported Experience Measure (ED PREM) for the Dutch setting.

Methods: A single-centre validation study was conducted in a Dutch academic hospital. Step 1 involved forward and backward translation to produce a Dutch translation of the ED PREM (prototype). Step 2 involved establishing face and content validity of the Dutch prototype through cognitive patient interviews and researcher team consensus meetings. Step 3 involved administering the resultant Dutch pilot ED PREM to an ED population (n=527), to be able to perform psychometric analyses on this sample. Descriptive statistics and item reduction analyses were conducted prior to confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). CFA was used to confirm the structural validity of the Dutch ED PREM, and internal consistency was assessed.

Results: The face and content validity of the prototype Dutch ED PREM was 'good' after 15 cognitive interviews and expert consultation. Over two-thirds of participants (357/527) completed the Dutch pilot ED PREM. Scores were high across all four domains. Several items were removed due to high ceiling effects and a large number of 'not applicable' responses. The final 18-item Dutch ED PREM showed acceptable model fit with CFA (χ2(df) 7519.55 (153), p<0.001, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation=0.090, Tucker-Lewis Index=0.942, Comparative Fit Index=0.951, Standardised Root Mean Square Residual=0.035). Internal consistency was high (Cronbach's alpha ranged 0.85-0.97 per domain).

Conclusions: The final 18-item Dutch ED PREM showed good validity and reliability for measuring ED patient experience. It is suitable and feasible for use in clinical practice to assess and improve the person-centredness of emergency care.

以人为本的急诊护理:澳大利亚急诊科患者报告经验措施(ED PREM)在荷兰的翻译和跨文化验证。
背景:测量和评估急诊科(ED)患者的经验对提高急诊护理质量至关重要。然而,许多国家缺乏具体和有效的工具来衡量急诊科患者的经验。因此,本研究的目的是翻译和跨文化验证澳大利亚ED患者报告经验测量(ED PREM)在荷兰的设置。方法:在荷兰某学术医院进行单中心验证研究。步骤1包括向前和向后翻译,以产生ED PREM(原型)的荷兰语翻译。第二步是通过认知病人访谈和研究者团队共识会议建立荷兰原型的面孔效度和内容效度。第3步涉及对ED人群(n=527)实施由此产生的荷兰ED PREM试点,以便能够对该样本进行心理测量分析。在验证性因子分析(CFA)之前进行描述性统计和项目缩减分析。采用CFA验证荷兰ED PREM的结构效度,并评估其内部一致性。结果:经过15次认知访谈和专家咨询,原型荷兰ED PREM的面孔效度和内容效度均为“良好”。超过三分之二的参与者(357/527)完成了荷兰试点ED PREM,四个领域的得分都很高。由于高上限效应和大量“不适用”回复,一些项目被删除。最终的18项荷兰ED PREM与CFA (χ2(df) 7519.55(153))的模型拟合良好。结论:最终的18项荷兰ED PREM在测量ED患者体验方面具有良好的效度和信度。在临床实践中评价和提高急诊护理的“以人为本”是适宜和可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Journal
Emergency Medicine Journal 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.50%
发文量
262
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Emergency Medicine Journal is a leading international journal reporting developments and advances in emergency medicine and acute care. It has relevance to all specialties involved in the management of emergencies in the hospital and prehospital environment. Each issue contains editorials, reviews, original research, evidence based reviews, letters and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信