Machine Learning-Based Model Selection and Averaging Outperform Single-Model Approaches for a Priori Vancomycin Precision Dosing.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Wisse van Os, Amaury O'Jeanson, Carla Troisi, Chun Liu, Jordan T Brooks, Jasmine H Hughes, Dominic M H Tong, Ron J Keizer
{"title":"Machine Learning-Based Model Selection and Averaging Outperform Single-Model Approaches for a Priori Vancomycin Precision Dosing.","authors":"Wisse van Os, Amaury O'Jeanson, Carla Troisi, Chun Liu, Jordan T Brooks, Jasmine H Hughes, Dominic M H Tong, Ron J Keizer","doi":"10.1002/psp4.70084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Selecting an appropriate population pharmacokinetic (PK) model for individual patients in model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) can be challenging, particularly in the absence of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) samples. We developed a machine learning (ML) model to guide individualized PK model selection for a priori MIPD of vancomycin based on routinely recorded patient characteristics. This retrospective analysis included 343,636 vancomycin TDM records, each from a distinct adult patient across 156 healthcare centers, along with a priori predictions from six PK models. A multi-label classification approach was applied, labeling PK model predictions based on whether they fell within 80%-125% of observed TDM values. Various modeling strategies were evaluated using XGBoost as the base algorithm, with binary relevance selected for the final model. At the prediction stage, PK models were ranked and averaged for each patient based on ML-predicted probabilities that predictions would fall within 80%-125% of the observed concentration. Selecting the highest ranked PK model for each patient and ML-based model averaging outperformed all single PK models, body mass index-based selection, and naive averaging. On a population level, these ML approaches resulted in more accurate predictions, a higher proportion of predictions within 80%-125% of observed vancomycin concentrations, and no systematic bias. Predictive performance declined with lower ML-assigned rankings, and selecting the lowest-ranked PK model for each patient resulted in worse performance than the worst-performing single PK model. By guiding the selection of appropriate models and avoiding less suitable ones, ML approaches for a priori MIPD may improve early dosing decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10774,"journal":{"name":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/psp4.70084","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Selecting an appropriate population pharmacokinetic (PK) model for individual patients in model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) can be challenging, particularly in the absence of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) samples. We developed a machine learning (ML) model to guide individualized PK model selection for a priori MIPD of vancomycin based on routinely recorded patient characteristics. This retrospective analysis included 343,636 vancomycin TDM records, each from a distinct adult patient across 156 healthcare centers, along with a priori predictions from six PK models. A multi-label classification approach was applied, labeling PK model predictions based on whether they fell within 80%-125% of observed TDM values. Various modeling strategies were evaluated using XGBoost as the base algorithm, with binary relevance selected for the final model. At the prediction stage, PK models were ranked and averaged for each patient based on ML-predicted probabilities that predictions would fall within 80%-125% of the observed concentration. Selecting the highest ranked PK model for each patient and ML-based model averaging outperformed all single PK models, body mass index-based selection, and naive averaging. On a population level, these ML approaches resulted in more accurate predictions, a higher proportion of predictions within 80%-125% of observed vancomycin concentrations, and no systematic bias. Predictive performance declined with lower ML-assigned rankings, and selecting the lowest-ranked PK model for each patient resulted in worse performance than the worst-performing single PK model. By guiding the selection of appropriate models and avoiding less suitable ones, ML approaches for a priori MIPD may improve early dosing decisions.

基于机器学习的模型选择和平均优于单模型方法的先验万古霉素精确给药。
在模型信息精确给药(MIPD)中,为个体患者选择合适的群体药代动力学(PK)模型可能具有挑战性,特别是在缺乏治疗药物监测(TDM)样本的情况下。我们开发了一个机器学习(ML)模型,以指导基于常规记录的患者特征的万古霉素先验MIPD的个性化PK模型选择。这项回顾性分析包括343,636份万古霉素TDM记录,每一份记录来自156个医疗中心的不同成年患者,以及来自6个PK模型的先验预测。采用多标签分类方法,根据PK模型预测是否落在观察到的TDM值的80%-125%范围内进行标记。以XGBoost为基础算法对各种建模策略进行了评估,并选择二元相关性作为最终模型。在预测阶段,根据机器学习预测的概率对每个患者的PK模型进行排序和平均,预测结果将落在观察浓度的80%-125%范围内。为每个患者选择排名最高的PK模型和基于ml的模型平均优于所有单一PK模型、基于体重指数的选择和朴素平均。在总体水平上,这些ML方法的预测更准确,预测比例在观察到的万古霉素浓度的80%-125%之间,并且没有系统偏倚。预测性能随着ml分配排名的降低而下降,为每个患者选择排名最低的PK模型的结果比表现最差的单一PK模型的结果更差。通过指导选择合适的模型,避免不合适的模型,先验MIPD的ML方法可以改善早期给药决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
11.40%
发文量
146
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信