Building a risk prediction model for anastomotic leakage postoperative low rectal cancer based on Lasso-Logistic regression.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Zhenhao Quan, Lin Lin, Renwei Huang, Kaiyu Sun, Feipeng Xu
{"title":"Building a risk prediction model for anastomotic leakage postoperative low rectal cancer based on Lasso-Logistic regression.","authors":"Zhenhao Quan, Lin Lin, Renwei Huang, Kaiyu Sun, Feipeng Xu","doi":"10.1186/s12876-025-04128-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To build a nomogram model for predicting the risk of anastomotic leakage (AL) postoperative low rectal cancer based on Lasso-Logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 482 patients with rectal cancer who underwent low rectal cancer surgery in our hospital from June 2017 to May 2023 were selected as the training set, and 127 patients with rectal cancer who underwent low rectal cancer surgery in our hospital from June 2023 to April 2025 were selected as the validation set. According to whether AL occurred postoperative, the patients in the training set were divided into AL group (n = 54) and N-AL group (n = 428). The data of each group were collected, and the influencing factors of AL in patients postoperative with rectal cancer in the training set were analyzed by Lasso-Logistic regression model. H-L goodness-of-fit test, ROC curve and calibration curve were used to analyze the discrimination and consistency of the model. The nomogram model was validated using the validation set. The DCA curve was used to evaluate the clinical utility of the model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the training set, the AL group had a higher proportion of patients with tumor stage ≥ T3 and longer operation times compared to the N-AL group; additionally, fewer AL patients had a protective stoma, and the tumor was located a shorter distance from the tumor to the anal verge than in the N-AL group. (P < 0.05). Lasso-Logistic regression analysis showed that when the penalty coefficient λ = 0.02735463, the model demonstrated good performance, gender (OR = 3.107), NRS2002 score (OR = 8.619), protective stoma (OR = 0.297), distance from tumor to anal verge (OR = 0.284), operation time (OR = 1.033) were the influencing factors of postoperative AL in low rectal cancer (P < 0.05). The 5 influencing factors were introduced into R software to establish a nomogram model for the risk of postoperative AL in low rectal cancer. The area under the ROC curve was 0.940. H-L goodness of fit test showed that there was no significant difference between the predicted value of the model and the actual observed value (χ<sup>2</sup> = 6.438, P = 0.598). The slope of the calibration curve was close to 1. The validation set showed that the nomogram model had good discrimination and consistency. The DCA curve showed that the model had high clinical utility and net benefit when the risk threshold was between 0.08 and 0.85.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Gender, NRS2002 rating, diverting ostomy, distance from tumor to anal margin, and operation time are all influencing factors of postoperative AL in low rectal cancer. The nomogram prediction model based on Lasso-Logistic regression has high consistency, discrimination and clinical application value.</p>","PeriodicalId":9129,"journal":{"name":"BMC Gastroenterology","volume":"25 1","pages":"540"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12309234/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-025-04128-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To build a nomogram model for predicting the risk of anastomotic leakage (AL) postoperative low rectal cancer based on Lasso-Logistic regression.

Methods: A total of 482 patients with rectal cancer who underwent low rectal cancer surgery in our hospital from June 2017 to May 2023 were selected as the training set, and 127 patients with rectal cancer who underwent low rectal cancer surgery in our hospital from June 2023 to April 2025 were selected as the validation set. According to whether AL occurred postoperative, the patients in the training set were divided into AL group (n = 54) and N-AL group (n = 428). The data of each group were collected, and the influencing factors of AL in patients postoperative with rectal cancer in the training set were analyzed by Lasso-Logistic regression model. H-L goodness-of-fit test, ROC curve and calibration curve were used to analyze the discrimination and consistency of the model. The nomogram model was validated using the validation set. The DCA curve was used to evaluate the clinical utility of the model.

Results: In the training set, the AL group had a higher proportion of patients with tumor stage ≥ T3 and longer operation times compared to the N-AL group; additionally, fewer AL patients had a protective stoma, and the tumor was located a shorter distance from the tumor to the anal verge than in the N-AL group. (P < 0.05). Lasso-Logistic regression analysis showed that when the penalty coefficient λ = 0.02735463, the model demonstrated good performance, gender (OR = 3.107), NRS2002 score (OR = 8.619), protective stoma (OR = 0.297), distance from tumor to anal verge (OR = 0.284), operation time (OR = 1.033) were the influencing factors of postoperative AL in low rectal cancer (P < 0.05). The 5 influencing factors were introduced into R software to establish a nomogram model for the risk of postoperative AL in low rectal cancer. The area under the ROC curve was 0.940. H-L goodness of fit test showed that there was no significant difference between the predicted value of the model and the actual observed value (χ2 = 6.438, P = 0.598). The slope of the calibration curve was close to 1. The validation set showed that the nomogram model had good discrimination and consistency. The DCA curve showed that the model had high clinical utility and net benefit when the risk threshold was between 0.08 and 0.85.

Conclusion: Gender, NRS2002 rating, diverting ostomy, distance from tumor to anal margin, and operation time are all influencing factors of postoperative AL in low rectal cancer. The nomogram prediction model based on Lasso-Logistic regression has high consistency, discrimination and clinical application value.

基于Lasso-Logistic回归建立低位直肠癌术后吻合口漏风险预测模型
目的:建立基于Lasso-Logistic回归预测低位直肠癌术后吻合口漏(AL)风险的nomogram模型。方法:选取2017年6月至2023年5月在我院行低位直肠癌手术的482例直肠癌患者作为训练集,选取2023年6月至2025年4月在我院行低位直肠癌手术的127例直肠癌患者作为验证集。根据术后是否发生AL,将训练集中的患者分为AL组(n = 54)和n -AL组(n = 428)。收集各组数据,采用Lasso-Logistic回归模型对训练集中直肠癌术后患者AL的影响因素进行分析。采用H-L拟合优度检验、ROC曲线和标定曲线分析模型的判别性和一致性。利用验证集对模态图模型进行验证。采用DCA曲线评价模型的临床应用价值。结果:在训练集中,与N-AL组相比,AL组肿瘤分期≥T3的患者比例更高,手术时间更长;此外,AL患者较少有保护性造口,肿瘤位于肿瘤到肛门边缘的距离较N-AL组短。(p 2 = 6.438, p = 0.598)。标定曲线的斜率接近于1。验证集表明,模态图模型具有良好的判别性和一致性。DCA曲线显示,当风险阈值在0.08 ~ 0.85之间时,该模型具有较高的临床效用和净效益。结论:性别、NRS2002评分、转移造口、肿瘤至肛缘距离、手术时间是低位直肠癌术后AL的影响因素。基于Lasso-Logistic回归的nomogram预测模型具有较高的一致性、辨别力和临床应用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Gastroenterology
BMC Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
465
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Gastroenterology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信