The Association of Social Vulnerability and Area Deprivation With Open Versus Laparoscopic Partial Colectomy for Colon Cancer.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
John D Salvemini, Kelly Brister, Wayne Shannon Orr, Wade O Christopher
{"title":"The Association of Social Vulnerability and Area Deprivation With Open Versus Laparoscopic Partial Colectomy for Colon Cancer.","authors":"John D Salvemini, Kelly Brister, Wayne Shannon Orr, Wade O Christopher","doi":"10.1177/00031348251363498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionComparisons between open and laparoscopic partial colectomy for colon cancer are well documented. Social vulnerability (SVI) and area deprivation (ADI) indices reflect social determinants of health, often associated with worse surgical outcomes. Here we examine the association of SVI and ADI with partial colectomy approach.MethodsData came from the Epic Cosmos database for patients with colon cancer who underwent partial colectomy between 2013 and 2022. Only patients with documented SVI were included. Descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression were performed.ResultsThis study included 41,158 patients with colon cancer, of which 18,446 patients underwent open and 22,712 patients underwent laparoscopic partial colectomy. White patients were more likely to undergo laparoscopic colectomy than Black patients (OR: 1.11, 95% CI 1.05-1.17, <i>P</i> < .001). Thirty-day and 12-month mortality were higher in the open (4.7% and 14.5%) than laparoscopic group (1.0% and 4.9%). Upper quartile SVI and ADI had higher odds of open surgery (OR: 1.24, 95% CI 1.18-1.30, <i>P</i> < .001; OR: 1.45, 95% CI 1.39-1.52, <i>P</i> < .001, respectively).ConclusionUpper quartile SVI and ADI had higher odds of open partial colectomy for colon cancer. Clinical presentation and stage at diagnosis largely dictate the approach. Increasing CRC awareness and screenings while promoting laparoscopic partial colectomy would benefit populations with high social vulnerability and area deprivation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"31348251363498"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348251363498","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionComparisons between open and laparoscopic partial colectomy for colon cancer are well documented. Social vulnerability (SVI) and area deprivation (ADI) indices reflect social determinants of health, often associated with worse surgical outcomes. Here we examine the association of SVI and ADI with partial colectomy approach.MethodsData came from the Epic Cosmos database for patients with colon cancer who underwent partial colectomy between 2013 and 2022. Only patients with documented SVI were included. Descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression were performed.ResultsThis study included 41,158 patients with colon cancer, of which 18,446 patients underwent open and 22,712 patients underwent laparoscopic partial colectomy. White patients were more likely to undergo laparoscopic colectomy than Black patients (OR: 1.11, 95% CI 1.05-1.17, P < .001). Thirty-day and 12-month mortality were higher in the open (4.7% and 14.5%) than laparoscopic group (1.0% and 4.9%). Upper quartile SVI and ADI had higher odds of open surgery (OR: 1.24, 95% CI 1.18-1.30, P < .001; OR: 1.45, 95% CI 1.39-1.52, P < .001, respectively).ConclusionUpper quartile SVI and ADI had higher odds of open partial colectomy for colon cancer. Clinical presentation and stage at diagnosis largely dictate the approach. Increasing CRC awareness and screenings while promoting laparoscopic partial colectomy would benefit populations with high social vulnerability and area deprivation.

社会脆弱性和区域剥夺与开放与腹腔镜部分结肠切除术结肠癌的关系。
比较开放和腹腔镜部分结肠切除术结肠癌有很好的文献记载。社会脆弱性(SVI)和区域剥夺(ADI)指数反映了健康的社会决定因素,通常与较差的手术结果有关。在这里,我们研究SVI和ADI与部分结肠切除术入路的关系。数据来自Epic Cosmos数据库,数据来自2013年至2022年期间接受部分结肠切除术的结肠癌患者。仅纳入有SVI记录的患者。进行描述性统计和二元逻辑回归。结果本研究纳入41,158例结肠癌患者,其中18,446例患者行开放结肠切除术,22,712例患者行腹腔镜部分结肠切除术。白人患者比黑人患者更有可能接受腹腔镜结肠切除术(OR: 1.11, 95% CI 1.05-1.17, P < 0.001)。开腹组30天和12个月死亡率分别为4.7%和14.5%高于腹腔镜组(1.0%和4.9%)。上四分位数SVI和ADI的开放性手术几率较高(OR: 1.24, 95% CI 1.18-1.30, P < 0.001;OR: 1.45, 95% CI 1.39 ~ 1.52, P < 0.001)。结论上四分位数SVI和ADI有较高的结肠癌开腹部分结肠切除术的可能性。临床表现和诊断阶段在很大程度上决定了方法。在促进腹腔镜部分结肠切除术的同时,提高对结直肠癌的认识和筛查将使社会脆弱性高和地区贫困的人群受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Surgeon
American Surgeon 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
623
期刊介绍: The American Surgeon is a monthly peer-reviewed publication published by the Southeastern Surgical Congress. Its area of concentration is clinical general surgery, as defined by the content areas of the American Board of Surgery: alimentary tract (including bariatric surgery), abdomen and its contents, breast, skin and soft tissue, endocrine system, solid organ transplantation, pediatric surgery, surgical critical care, surgical oncology (including head and neck surgery), trauma and emergency surgery, and vascular surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信