Prevalence and Clinical Characteristics of Severe Asthma With Fungal Sensitization in Korea.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY
Hyo-In Rhyou, Tae-Bum Kim, Sun-Young Yoon, Jae-Woo Kwon, Hye-Kyung Park, Sung-Ryeol Kim, Young-Hee Nam, Joo-Hee Kim, Young-Joo Cho, Ho Joo Yoon, Yoo Seob Shin, Jae-Woo Jung, Taehoon Lee, Yoon-Seok Chang, Sang-Heon Cho, Seung-Eun Lee, Byung-Jae Lee, Hwa Young Lee, Hyun Jung Jin, So-Young Park, Kyoung-Hee Sohn, Byung Keun Kim, Youngsoo Lee, Woo-Jung Song, Sang-Heon Kim, Chan Sun Park
{"title":"Prevalence and Clinical Characteristics of Severe Asthma With Fungal Sensitization in Korea.","authors":"Hyo-In Rhyou, Tae-Bum Kim, Sun-Young Yoon, Jae-Woo Kwon, Hye-Kyung Park, Sung-Ryeol Kim, Young-Hee Nam, Joo-Hee Kim, Young-Joo Cho, Ho Joo Yoon, Yoo Seob Shin, Jae-Woo Jung, Taehoon Lee, Yoon-Seok Chang, Sang-Heon Cho, Seung-Eun Lee, Byung-Jae Lee, Hwa Young Lee, Hyun Jung Jin, So-Young Park, Kyoung-Hee Sohn, Byung Keun Kim, Youngsoo Lee, Woo-Jung Song, Sang-Heon Kim, Chan Sun Park","doi":"10.4168/aair.2025.17.4.447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Severe asthma with fungal sensitization (SAFS) is associated with life-threatening exacerbation and severe airflow limitation. We aimed to investigate the prevalence of fungal sensitization in asthma and clinical characteristics of SAFS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study analyzed data from the Cohort for Reality and Evolution of Adult Asthma in Korea and the Korean Severe Asthma Registry cohorts. Study subjects were classified based on fungal sensitization and asthma severity. Clinical characteristics of patients with severe asthma were compared according to fungal sensitization status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The rate of skin test positivity to fungi was 14.1% and 7.1% in severe asthma (n = 270) and non-severe asthma (n = 2,605). Patients with SAFS were diagnosed with asthma earlier than those with severe asthma without fungal sensitization (SANFS) (<i>P</i> = 0.019), and had a lower body mass index compared to the SANFS group (<i>P</i> = 0.044). Factional exhaled nitric oxide levels and sputum eosinophilia/neutrophilia showed significant differences between the SAFS and SANFS groups (all <i>P</i> < 0.05). Patients with SAFS were more frequently treated with biologics (36.8% vs. 24.6%, <i>P</i> = 0.116) than those with SANFS. Multivariate analysis revealed that early diagnosed asthma was significantly associated with SAFS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The prevalence of fungal sensitization in severe asthma is approximately twice as high as in non-severe asthma. Early diagnosed asthma may be a risk factor for SAFS, and patients with SAFS face a greater burden of additional treatment compared to those with SANFS. SAFS has a distinct airway inflammation profile that differentiates it from SANFS.</p>","PeriodicalId":7547,"journal":{"name":"Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Research","volume":"17 4","pages":"447-459"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12318808/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4168/aair.2025.17.4.447","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Severe asthma with fungal sensitization (SAFS) is associated with life-threatening exacerbation and severe airflow limitation. We aimed to investigate the prevalence of fungal sensitization in asthma and clinical characteristics of SAFS.

Methods: This study analyzed data from the Cohort for Reality and Evolution of Adult Asthma in Korea and the Korean Severe Asthma Registry cohorts. Study subjects were classified based on fungal sensitization and asthma severity. Clinical characteristics of patients with severe asthma were compared according to fungal sensitization status.

Results: The rate of skin test positivity to fungi was 14.1% and 7.1% in severe asthma (n = 270) and non-severe asthma (n = 2,605). Patients with SAFS were diagnosed with asthma earlier than those with severe asthma without fungal sensitization (SANFS) (P = 0.019), and had a lower body mass index compared to the SANFS group (P = 0.044). Factional exhaled nitric oxide levels and sputum eosinophilia/neutrophilia showed significant differences between the SAFS and SANFS groups (all P < 0.05). Patients with SAFS were more frequently treated with biologics (36.8% vs. 24.6%, P = 0.116) than those with SANFS. Multivariate analysis revealed that early diagnosed asthma was significantly associated with SAFS.

Conclusions: The prevalence of fungal sensitization in severe asthma is approximately twice as high as in non-severe asthma. Early diagnosed asthma may be a risk factor for SAFS, and patients with SAFS face a greater burden of additional treatment compared to those with SANFS. SAFS has a distinct airway inflammation profile that differentiates it from SANFS.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

韩国严重哮喘伴真菌致敏的患病率及临床特点。
目的:真菌致敏的严重哮喘(SAFS)与危及生命的恶化和严重的气流限制有关。我们的目的是调查真菌致敏在哮喘中的患病率和SAFS的临床特征。方法:本研究分析了韩国成人哮喘的现实和进化队列和韩国严重哮喘登记队列的数据。研究对象根据真菌致敏性和哮喘严重程度进行分类。根据真菌致敏情况比较重症哮喘患者的临床特征。结果:重度哮喘(270例)和非重度哮喘(2605例)皮肤试验真菌阳性率分别为14.1%和7.1%。与非真菌致敏的严重哮喘(SANFS)组相比,急性真菌致敏患者的哮喘诊断时间更早(P = 0.019),体质量指数(bmi)低于SANFS组(P = 0.044)。SAFS组和SANFS组呼气一氧化氮水平和痰嗜酸性粒细胞/中性粒细胞差异有统计学意义(均P < 0.05)。SAFS患者比SANFS患者更频繁地使用生物制剂(36.8% vs. 24.6%, P = 0.116)。多因素分析显示,早期诊断的哮喘与SAFS显著相关。结论:真菌致敏在严重哮喘患者中的患病率大约是非严重哮喘患者的两倍。早期诊断的哮喘可能是SAFS的一个危险因素,与SANFS患者相比,SAFS患者面临更大的额外治疗负担。SAFS与SANFS有明显的气道炎症特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.80%
发文量
53
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal features cutting-edge original research, brief communications, and state-of-the-art reviews in the specialties of allergy, asthma, and immunology, including clinical and experimental studies and instructive case reports. Contemporary reviews summarize information on topics for researchers and physicians in the fields of allergy and immunology. As of January 2017, AAIR do not accept case reports. However, if it is a clinically important case, authors can submit it in the form of letter to the Editor. Editorials and letters to the Editor explore controversial issues and encourage further discussion among physicians dealing with allergy, immunology, pediatric respirology, and related medical fields. AAIR also features topics in practice and management and recent advances in equipment and techniques for clinicians concerned with clinical manifestations of allergies and pediatric respiratory diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信