The Systemic Inefficiency of Australian Schools: A Policy and Measurement Review

IF 1.9 2区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL ISSUES
Michael G. Sciffer
{"title":"The Systemic Inefficiency of Australian Schools: A Policy and Measurement Review","authors":"Michael G. Sciffer","doi":"10.1002/ajs4.70004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Entrenched social inequalities mean that Australia's schooling system is far from achieving the Alice Spring's (Mparntwe) Education Declaration's equity goal. This is associated with Australian schools being among the most socially segregated within the OECD. The Federal government's Productivity Commission has identified that the concentration of disadvantaged students into disadvantaged schools is a systemic inefficiency impeding student learning. In response to the Productivity Commission's findings, the O'Brien Review recommended the tracking and reporting of the socioeconomic diversity of schools and systems. This would require major school accountability reforms to the <i>National Report on Schooling in Australia</i> as it does not report on the associations between school segregation, school composition, and student outcomes. This is due to the <i>Measurement Framework for Schooling in Australia</i> not specifying how to measure school segregation, school socioeconomic context, nor how they relate to schooling outcomes. The next National School Reform Agreement could improve the accountability of governments and schools for student equity groups through the measurement and reporting of systemic barriers to student learning. This article suggests a rage of measures and reporting mechanisms to enable such reforms.</p>","PeriodicalId":46787,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Social Issues","volume":"60 2","pages":"661-671"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajs4.70004","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Social Issues","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajs4.70004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Entrenched social inequalities mean that Australia's schooling system is far from achieving the Alice Spring's (Mparntwe) Education Declaration's equity goal. This is associated with Australian schools being among the most socially segregated within the OECD. The Federal government's Productivity Commission has identified that the concentration of disadvantaged students into disadvantaged schools is a systemic inefficiency impeding student learning. In response to the Productivity Commission's findings, the O'Brien Review recommended the tracking and reporting of the socioeconomic diversity of schools and systems. This would require major school accountability reforms to the National Report on Schooling in Australia as it does not report on the associations between school segregation, school composition, and student outcomes. This is due to the Measurement Framework for Schooling in Australia not specifying how to measure school segregation, school socioeconomic context, nor how they relate to schooling outcomes. The next National School Reform Agreement could improve the accountability of governments and schools for student equity groups through the measurement and reporting of systemic barriers to student learning. This article suggests a rage of measures and reporting mechanisms to enable such reforms.

Abstract Image

澳大利亚学校的系统性低效率:政策与测量回顾
根深蒂固的社会不平等意味着澳大利亚的教育体系远未达到《爱丽丝泉教育宣言》的公平目标。这与澳大利亚学校是经合组织中社会隔离最严重的学校有关。联邦政府的生产力委员会已经确定,弱势学生集中到弱势学校是一种系统性的低效率,阻碍了学生的学习。作为对生产力委员会调查结果的回应,《奥布莱恩评论》建议对学校和系统的社会经济多样性进行跟踪和报告。这就需要对澳大利亚国家学校教育报告进行重大的学校问责制改革,因为它没有报告学校隔离、学校组成和学生成绩之间的联系。这是由于澳大利亚的学校教育衡量框架没有具体说明如何衡量学校隔离、学校社会经济背景,也没有说明它们与学校教育成果的关系。下一个国家学校改革协议可以通过衡量和报告学生学习的系统性障碍来改善政府和学校对学生公平团体的问责制。本文提出了一系列措施和报告机制,以实现此类改革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.00%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信