Integrity Versus Ideology in Automated Assessment: The Jobseeker Snapshot

IF 1.9 2区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL ISSUES
Angelika Papadopoulos
{"title":"Integrity Versus Ideology in Automated Assessment: The Jobseeker Snapshot","authors":"Angelika Papadopoulos","doi":"10.1002/ajs4.70007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article analyses the entanglement of political ideology and digitalisation in the Australian approach to online assessment of claims for income security, with a focus on job seeker classification. In the Australian social security system, the Job Seeker Classification Instrument (JSCI) has been used to screen and ‘score’ income security claimants, to estimate the likelihood of their remaining on income security payments 12 months after their initial claim and to direct claimants into different forms of employment services support. After two decades of use, the JSCI was ‘digitalised’ as the Job Seeker Snapshot. A socio-technical analysis of this case of digital conversion illuminates how classification incorporates political-ideological beliefs about the causes of long-term unemployment and of the desirability of intervention. It identifies the implications of ideological interoperability for system integrity, both across and within systems, and underlines the importance of a historical perspective in studies of the digitalisation of welfare systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":46787,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Social Issues","volume":"60 2","pages":"418-427"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajs4.70007","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Social Issues","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajs4.70007","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article analyses the entanglement of political ideology and digitalisation in the Australian approach to online assessment of claims for income security, with a focus on job seeker classification. In the Australian social security system, the Job Seeker Classification Instrument (JSCI) has been used to screen and ‘score’ income security claimants, to estimate the likelihood of their remaining on income security payments 12 months after their initial claim and to direct claimants into different forms of employment services support. After two decades of use, the JSCI was ‘digitalised’ as the Job Seeker Snapshot. A socio-technical analysis of this case of digital conversion illuminates how classification incorporates political-ideological beliefs about the causes of long-term unemployment and of the desirability of intervention. It identifies the implications of ideological interoperability for system integrity, both across and within systems, and underlines the importance of a historical perspective in studies of the digitalisation of welfare systems.

自动化评估中的诚信与意识形态:求职者的快照
本文分析了澳大利亚收入保障索赔在线评估方法中政治意识形态和数字化的纠缠,重点是求职者分类。在澳大利亚社会保障体系中,求职者分类工具(JSCI)被用于筛选和“评分”收入保障申请人,以估计他们在首次申请后12个月内继续领取收入保障金的可能性,并指导申请人获得不同形式的就业服务支持。经过20年的使用,JSCI被“数字化”为求职者快照。对这一数字转换案例的社会技术分析阐明了分类是如何结合关于长期失业原因和干预的可取性的政治意识形态信念的。它确定了意识形态互操作性对系统完整性的影响,包括系统之间和系统内部,并强调了历史视角在福利系统数字化研究中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.00%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信