The carbon footprint of transperineal prostate biopsy

IF 1.9 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
BJUI compass Pub Date : 2025-07-30 DOI:10.1002/bco2.70063
Daniel A. Carson, Ali Hooshyari, Jesse Gale, Greg Evans, Flavio V. Ordones, Lodewikus P. Vermeulen
{"title":"The carbon footprint of transperineal prostate biopsy","authors":"Daniel A. Carson,&nbsp;Ali Hooshyari,&nbsp;Jesse Gale,&nbsp;Greg Evans,&nbsp;Flavio V. Ordones,&nbsp;Lodewikus P. Vermeulen","doi":"10.1002/bco2.70063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate the carbon footprint of transperineal prostate biopsy (TPPB). Climate change is the biggest global public health threat of the 21st century. Healthcare contributes 5% to global greenhouse gas emissions. Despite growing enthusiasm for sustainable urology, there is little data on the environmental impact of urological practice.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patients and methods</h3>\n \n <p>Emissions associated with TPPB (under local anaesthesia) at a hospital in Aotearoa New Zealand were estimated from electricity consumption, procurement of equipment/supplies, travel of staff and patients, waste disposal and sterilisation of linen. Emissions coefficients were used to determine CO<sub>2</sub> equivalents (kgCO<sub>2</sub>e) emitted.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>TPPB was associated with 70 kgCO<sub>2</sub>e of emissions per case. This equates to 280 km of travel by car, or an economy seat on a 70-minute flight. The largest contributors were procurement (76%) and travel (23%). Electricity, waste disposal and sterilisation of linen did not contribute significantly to emissions (cumulatively &lt;1.5%).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This is the first study to evaluate the carbon footprint of a TPPB. Emissions were derived mostly from procurement and travel. These may be mitigated by review of standardised equipment packs, transitioning to reusables and introducing outreach biopsy clinics. Adherence to pragmatic evidence-based guidelines for prostate cancer may reduce emissions associated with overdiagnosis and unnecessary biopsies. Further research is required to characterise the broader environmental impact of urology services.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72420,"journal":{"name":"BJUI compass","volume":"6 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bco2.70063","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJUI compass","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bco2.70063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the carbon footprint of transperineal prostate biopsy (TPPB). Climate change is the biggest global public health threat of the 21st century. Healthcare contributes 5% to global greenhouse gas emissions. Despite growing enthusiasm for sustainable urology, there is little data on the environmental impact of urological practice.

Patients and methods

Emissions associated with TPPB (under local anaesthesia) at a hospital in Aotearoa New Zealand were estimated from electricity consumption, procurement of equipment/supplies, travel of staff and patients, waste disposal and sterilisation of linen. Emissions coefficients were used to determine CO2 equivalents (kgCO2e) emitted.

Results

TPPB was associated with 70 kgCO2e of emissions per case. This equates to 280 km of travel by car, or an economy seat on a 70-minute flight. The largest contributors were procurement (76%) and travel (23%). Electricity, waste disposal and sterilisation of linen did not contribute significantly to emissions (cumulatively <1.5%).

Conclusions

This is the first study to evaluate the carbon footprint of a TPPB. Emissions were derived mostly from procurement and travel. These may be mitigated by review of standardised equipment packs, transitioning to reusables and introducing outreach biopsy clinics. Adherence to pragmatic evidence-based guidelines for prostate cancer may reduce emissions associated with overdiagnosis and unnecessary biopsies. Further research is required to characterise the broader environmental impact of urology services.

Abstract Image

经会阴前列腺活检的碳足迹
目的评价经会阴前列腺活检(TPPB)的碳足迹。气候变化是21世纪最大的全球公共卫生威胁。医疗保健占全球温室气体排放量的5%。尽管人们对可持续泌尿外科的热情日益高涨,但很少有关于泌尿外科实践对环境影响的数据。对新西兰奥特罗阿一家医院与TPPB(局部麻醉下)相关的排放进行了估算,这些排放来自电力消耗、设备/用品采购、工作人员和患者旅行、废物处理和亚麻布消毒。排放系数用于确定排放的CO2当量(kgCO2e)。结果TPPB与每例70 kgCO2e排放量相关。这相当于开车行驶280公里,或乘坐70分钟航班的经济舱座位。最大的贡献是采购(76%)和差旅(23%)。电力、废物处理和亚麻消毒对排放没有显著贡献(累计1.5%)。结论本研究首次对TPPB的碳足迹进行了评价。排放主要来自采购和旅行。这些问题可通过审查标准化设备包、过渡到可重复使用设备和引入外联活检诊所来缓解。坚持实用的基于证据的前列腺癌指南可以减少与过度诊断和不必要的活检相关的排放。需要进一步的研究来描述泌尿科服务对环境的广泛影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信