Was the abolition of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission an act of dispossession?

IF 1.9 2区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL ISSUES
Tui Crumpen
{"title":"Was the abolition of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission an act of dispossession?","authors":"Tui Crumpen","doi":"10.1002/ajs4.377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission (ATSIC) has been described as one of the most comprehensive regional and national governance structures for Indigenous people in Australia. This paper looks briefly at its operational life between 1990 and 2005 and focusses on its abolition, arguing that this was an act of dispossession. The ATSIC was, for its time, a remarkable achievement for both the nation state and Indigenous people. Acting as an institution to both represent and deliver services to Indigenous people, the ATSIC model was, and could have remained, a powerful organisation for enacting critical change. Constructed and then removed by the nation state, the ATSIC's abolition dispossessed Indigenous people of a political framework dedicated to organising an Indigenous collective voice. This dispossession, different from earlier waves of dispossession from land, resources and cultural freedoms, can be understood by the application of critical Indigenous institutional analysis. Through its own structure and electoral representation, the ATSIC had made visible the quest for self-determination and gave Indigenous people decision-making powers not since replicated. Redirecting ATSIC's limited decision making back to government exposed the illusion of control. The ATSIC's abolition left a void in the growing capability of Indigenous people to self-determine and a gaping hole in Australia's national political imagination.</p>","PeriodicalId":46787,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Social Issues","volume":"60 2","pages":"562-573"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajs4.377","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Social Issues","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajs4.377","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission (ATSIC) has been described as one of the most comprehensive regional and national governance structures for Indigenous people in Australia. This paper looks briefly at its operational life between 1990 and 2005 and focusses on its abolition, arguing that this was an act of dispossession. The ATSIC was, for its time, a remarkable achievement for both the nation state and Indigenous people. Acting as an institution to both represent and deliver services to Indigenous people, the ATSIC model was, and could have remained, a powerful organisation for enacting critical change. Constructed and then removed by the nation state, the ATSIC's abolition dispossessed Indigenous people of a political framework dedicated to organising an Indigenous collective voice. This dispossession, different from earlier waves of dispossession from land, resources and cultural freedoms, can be understood by the application of critical Indigenous institutional analysis. Through its own structure and electoral representation, the ATSIC had made visible the quest for self-determination and gave Indigenous people decision-making powers not since replicated. Redirecting ATSIC's limited decision making back to government exposed the illusion of control. The ATSIC's abolition left a void in the growing capability of Indigenous people to self-determine and a gaping hole in Australia's national political imagination.

废除土著和托雷斯海峡岛民委员会是一种剥夺行为吗?
土著和托雷斯海峡岛民委员会被描述为澳大利亚土著人民最全面的区域和国家治理结构之一。本文简要回顾了它在1990年至2005年间的运行寿命,并着重于它的废除,认为这是一种剥夺行为。在当时,ATSIC对国家和土著人民来说都是一项了不起的成就。作为一个代表土著人民并向其提供服务的机构,ATSIC模式曾经是,而且本可以继续是一个推动重大变革的强大组织。由民族国家建立,然后移除,废除ATSIC剥夺了土著人民致力于组织土著集体声音的政治框架。与早期对土地、资源和文化自由的剥夺浪潮不同,这种剥夺可以通过应用批判性的土著制度分析来理解。通过其自身的结构和选举代表权,土著人民委员会明确表明了对自决的追求,并赋予土著人民从未复制过的决策权。将ATSIC有限的决策权重新交给政府,暴露了控制的幻觉。ATSIC的废除给土著人民日益增长的自我决定能力留下了一个空白,也给澳大利亚的国家政治想象留下了一个巨大的漏洞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.00%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信