A university and community partnership that built capacity through program evaluation

IF 2 4区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Candace Lind , Beth Archer-Kuhn , Natalie Beltrano , Lisa Garrisen , Janet Hettler , Sandra M. Reilly , Leianne Vye-Rogers , Justine Reyes
{"title":"A university and community partnership that built capacity through program evaluation","authors":"Candace Lind ,&nbsp;Beth Archer-Kuhn ,&nbsp;Natalie Beltrano ,&nbsp;Lisa Garrisen ,&nbsp;Janet Hettler ,&nbsp;Sandra M. Reilly ,&nbsp;Leianne Vye-Rogers ,&nbsp;Justine Reyes","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A community organization-university partnership was formed to complete program evaluation research to enhance the effectiveness of the organization in its efforts to improve the resiliency of families in crisis or in need of respite. Incorporating the voices of staff and former families who had the critical expertise and lived experiences with programs and evaluative tools undergirded this work. Six themes arose from focus groups and interview data that provided recommendations for leadership on the evaluative process and tools used and informed the literature review. The theoretical approach to this research highlighted program inequities and illuminated the need for more culturally safe program evaluation practices that respect diversity and inclusivity and focus on equity-building designs. Although time-consuming, front-line staff became familiar with their own program logic models, understood how they connected to their day-to-day work with children and families, and developed a sense of ownership through hands-on involvement. Importantly, logic model development was demystified. Recognizing the organization needed a less intimidating visual representation of their logic models, a one-page version was developed for each program along with fuller versions. A repository of measures developed for staff will ensure ongoing access to evidence-informed tools for updating the evaluative framework for their programs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48046,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation and Program Planning","volume":"112 ","pages":"Article 102669"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation and Program Planning","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718925001363","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A community organization-university partnership was formed to complete program evaluation research to enhance the effectiveness of the organization in its efforts to improve the resiliency of families in crisis or in need of respite. Incorporating the voices of staff and former families who had the critical expertise and lived experiences with programs and evaluative tools undergirded this work. Six themes arose from focus groups and interview data that provided recommendations for leadership on the evaluative process and tools used and informed the literature review. The theoretical approach to this research highlighted program inequities and illuminated the need for more culturally safe program evaluation practices that respect diversity and inclusivity and focus on equity-building designs. Although time-consuming, front-line staff became familiar with their own program logic models, understood how they connected to their day-to-day work with children and families, and developed a sense of ownership through hands-on involvement. Importantly, logic model development was demystified. Recognizing the organization needed a less intimidating visual representation of their logic models, a one-page version was developed for each program along with fuller versions. A repository of measures developed for staff will ensure ongoing access to evidence-informed tools for updating the evaluative framework for their programs.
通过项目评估建立能力的大学和社区伙伴关系
一个社区组织和大学的伙伴关系形成了,以完成项目评估研究,以提高该组织在努力提高危机或需要喘息的家庭的恢复能力方面的效率。将具有关键专业知识和生活经验的工作人员和前家庭的声音与项目和评估工具相结合,巩固了这项工作。从焦点小组和访谈数据中产生了六个主题,这些主题为评估过程和使用的工具的领导提供了建议,并为文献综述提供了信息。本研究的理论方法强调了项目的不平等,并阐明了更多文化上安全的项目评估实践的必要性,这些实践尊重多样性和包容性,并关注公平建设设计。虽然耗时,但一线员工熟悉了他们自己的项目逻辑模型,了解了如何将他们与儿童和家庭的日常工作联系起来,并通过亲身参与培养了一种主人主人感。重要的是,逻辑模型的开发被揭开了神秘面纱。认识到组织需要一个不那么吓人的逻辑模型的可视化表示,为每个程序开发了一个一页的版本以及更完整的版本。为工作人员制定的措施储存库将确保不断获得循证工具,以更新其方案的评价框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Evaluation and Program Planning
Evaluation and Program Planning SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: Evaluation and Program Planning is based on the principle that the techniques and methods of evaluation and planning transcend the boundaries of specific fields and that relevant contributions to these areas come from people representing many different positions, intellectual traditions, and interests. In order to further the development of evaluation and planning, we publish articles from the private and public sectors in a wide range of areas: organizational development and behavior, training, planning, human resource development, health and mental, social services, mental retardation, corrections, substance abuse, and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信