Worldwide practices in pulmonary function test reporting after lung transplantation

Jens Gottlieb MD , Erika Lease MD , Merel Hellemons MD, PhD , Kieran Halloran MD , Tereza Martinu MD, MHSc
{"title":"Worldwide practices in pulmonary function test reporting after lung transplantation","authors":"Jens Gottlieb MD ,&nbsp;Erika Lease MD ,&nbsp;Merel Hellemons MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Kieran Halloran MD ,&nbsp;Tereza Martinu MD, MHSc","doi":"10.1016/j.jhlto.2025.100347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Spirometry interpretation after lung transplantation (LTx) is complex, requiring a clear understanding of reference values and normal thresholds globally. Abnormal values are typically based on general population reference standards.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In April 2025, a 10-question online survey was conducted among International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation-members to determine the reference values and normal thresholds used worldwide for post-transplant spirometry interpretation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Responses from 58 centers, covering 22,080 lung transplant recipients and representing ∼40% of global transplant activity, were analyzed. Most patients (63%) were followed in the United States or Canada. Global lung initiative (GLI) reference was used for 60%, with 47% using the race-neutral version. The lower limit of normal (LLN) was reported in only 19% of pulmonary function assessments. Regional differences were noted in obstruction definition and impairment grading.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>While GLI-reference values are widely adopted, 40% of centers have yet to implement them, and LLN remains underutilized in spirometry reporting after LTx.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100741,"journal":{"name":"JHLT Open","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100347"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JHLT Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950133425001429","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Spirometry interpretation after lung transplantation (LTx) is complex, requiring a clear understanding of reference values and normal thresholds globally. Abnormal values are typically based on general population reference standards.

Methods

In April 2025, a 10-question online survey was conducted among International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation-members to determine the reference values and normal thresholds used worldwide for post-transplant spirometry interpretation.

Results

Responses from 58 centers, covering 22,080 lung transplant recipients and representing ∼40% of global transplant activity, were analyzed. Most patients (63%) were followed in the United States or Canada. Global lung initiative (GLI) reference was used for 60%, with 47% using the race-neutral version. The lower limit of normal (LLN) was reported in only 19% of pulmonary function assessments. Regional differences were noted in obstruction definition and impairment grading.

Conclusions

While GLI-reference values are widely adopted, 40% of centers have yet to implement them, and LLN remains underutilized in spirometry reporting after LTx.
肺移植术后肺功能检测报告的国际惯例
肺移植(LTx)后肺活量测定的解释是复杂的,需要清楚地了解参考值和全球正常阈值。异常值通常基于一般人群参考标准。方法2025年4月,在国际心肺移植学会(International Society of Heart and Lung transplantation)成员中进行了一项包含10个问题的在线调查,以确定全球范围内用于移植后肺活量测定解释的参考值和正常阈值。结果分析了来自58个中心的回复,涵盖22,080名肺移植受者,占全球移植活动的40%。大多数患者(63%)在美国或加拿大接受了随访。60%的人使用全球肺倡议(GLI)参考,47%的人使用种族中立版本。只有19%的肺功能评估报告了正常(LLN)的下限。在梗阻定义和损伤分级方面存在区域差异。结论虽然glii参考值被广泛采用,但40%的中心尚未实施,LLN在LTx后肺活量报告中仍未得到充分利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信