Examining the geriatric-friendliness of emergency departments in the Canadian province with the oldest population.

IF 2
CJEM Pub Date : 2025-07-28 DOI:10.1007/s43678-025-00974-7
Queen Jacques, Elise Thorburn, Jennifer Perry, David Bradbury-Squires, Susan Mercer, Michael Parsons, Kayla Furlong
{"title":"Examining the geriatric-friendliness of emergency departments in the Canadian province with the oldest population.","authors":"Queen Jacques, Elise Thorburn, Jennifer Perry, David Bradbury-Squires, Susan Mercer, Michael Parsons, Kayla Furlong","doi":"10.1007/s43678-025-00974-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The number of older adults presenting to emergency departments (EDs) is rising. The care of older adults in the ED is challenged by atypical disease presentations and multimorbidity, among other factors. The geriatric ED guidelines-first developed in the United States in 2014-were developed to help EDs improve the care of older adults. However, little is known about Canadian EDs adherence to or implementation of these guidelines and geriatric-friendly ED principles. Our study aimed to describe the geriatric-friendliness of EDs and identify barriers to implementation in Newfoundland and Labrador, the Canadian province with the oldest population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was performed at EDs across Newfoundland and Labrador. We recruited ED site representatives through social media, email listservs, and word of mouth. ED site representatives were healthcare professionals familiar with the care of older adults in the ED. A 28-item questionnaire and a semi-structured interview via telephone were conducted. Proportions and percentages are reported for categorical data. Interview data were grouped into themes based on common patterns in participant responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three EDs participated in the study. ED site representatives were physicians (n = 13), nurses (n = 5), and advanced care paramedics (n = 2). One site identified a physician with a focused education in geriatric emergency medicine. No sites had a nurse with a focused education in geriatric emergency medicine. Only one site tracked process and outcome measures. Most sites had wheelchair-accessible toilets and food and drink available. Barriers to making EDs more geriatric-friendly were identified and included challenges related to resources, infrastructure, education and training, the provision of adequate care, awareness of geriatric-friendly ED principles, and ability to implement change.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates a lack of geriatric-friendly EDs in Newfoundland and Labrador. Barriers to implementation were widespread and similar between participating ED sites.</p>","PeriodicalId":93937,"journal":{"name":"CJEM","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CJEM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-025-00974-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The number of older adults presenting to emergency departments (EDs) is rising. The care of older adults in the ED is challenged by atypical disease presentations and multimorbidity, among other factors. The geriatric ED guidelines-first developed in the United States in 2014-were developed to help EDs improve the care of older adults. However, little is known about Canadian EDs adherence to or implementation of these guidelines and geriatric-friendly ED principles. Our study aimed to describe the geriatric-friendliness of EDs and identify barriers to implementation in Newfoundland and Labrador, the Canadian province with the oldest population.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed at EDs across Newfoundland and Labrador. We recruited ED site representatives through social media, email listservs, and word of mouth. ED site representatives were healthcare professionals familiar with the care of older adults in the ED. A 28-item questionnaire and a semi-structured interview via telephone were conducted. Proportions and percentages are reported for categorical data. Interview data were grouped into themes based on common patterns in participant responses.

Results: Twenty-three EDs participated in the study. ED site representatives were physicians (n = 13), nurses (n = 5), and advanced care paramedics (n = 2). One site identified a physician with a focused education in geriatric emergency medicine. No sites had a nurse with a focused education in geriatric emergency medicine. Only one site tracked process and outcome measures. Most sites had wheelchair-accessible toilets and food and drink available. Barriers to making EDs more geriatric-friendly were identified and included challenges related to resources, infrastructure, education and training, the provision of adequate care, awareness of geriatric-friendly ED principles, and ability to implement change.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates a lack of geriatric-friendly EDs in Newfoundland and Labrador. Barriers to implementation were widespread and similar between participating ED sites.

调查加拿大人口最老省份急诊科对老年人的友好程度。
目的:到急诊科(EDs)就诊的老年人数量正在上升。在急诊科中,老年人的护理受到非典型疾病表现和多病以及其他因素的挑战。老年ED指南于2014年首次在美国制定,旨在帮助ED改善对老年人的护理。然而,很少有人知道加拿大的急诊科是否遵守或执行这些指南和老年人友好的急诊科原则。我们的研究旨在描述急诊科的老年友好性,并确定在加拿大人口最老的省份纽芬兰和拉布拉多实施急诊科的障碍。方法:横断面研究在纽芬兰和拉布拉多的急诊科进行。我们通过社交媒体、电子邮件列表和口口相传的方式招募ED网站代表。急诊科现场代表是熟悉急诊科老年人护理的医疗保健专业人员。通过电话进行了28项问卷调查和半结构化访谈。分类数据报告比例和百分比。访谈数据根据参与者回答的常见模式分组为主题。结果:23名急诊医生参与了研究。ED现场代表为医生(n = 13)、护士(n = 5)和高级护理护理人员(n = 2)。其中一个网站找到了一位接受过老年急诊医学重点教育的医生。没有一个站点有受过老年急诊医学重点教育的护士。只有一个站点跟踪了过程和结果度量。大多数地点都有方便轮椅使用的厕所,并提供食物和饮料。确定了使急诊科对老年人更友好的障碍,包括与资源、基础设施、教育和培训、提供足够的护理、对老年人友好的急诊科原则的认识以及实施变革的能力有关的挑战。结论:本研究表明纽芬兰和拉布拉多缺乏老年友好型急诊室。在参与的ED站点之间,实施的障碍普遍而相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信