Ambulatory Curriculum Enhancing Education for Modern Resident Learners.

PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.) Pub Date : 2025-06-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.22454/PRiMER.2025.929936
Selda Ishkin, Adam Halpern, Janelle Singh, Anna Cornish, Seleshi Demissie, Eleny Romanos-Sirakis
{"title":"Ambulatory Curriculum Enhancing Education for Modern Resident Learners.","authors":"Selda Ishkin, Adam Halpern, Janelle Singh, Anna Cornish, Seleshi Demissie, Eleny Romanos-Sirakis","doi":"10.22454/PRiMER.2025.929936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Data on the implementation of successful pediatric ambulatory curricula in residency are limited. Although most pediatric residents pursue careers in primary care, the educational focus in residency training sways toward inpatient medicine. Barriers exist to standardized, consistent teaching in the outpatient clinic. We aimed to create a novel longitudinal ambulatory curriculum focusing on high-yield topics geared toward modern learners that would be well-received and result in retained knowledge.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-two pediatric residents were exposed to an 18-month curriculum consisting of 62 high-yield ambulatory topics. Standardized topic guides were taught in brief sessions weekly. Pre- and posttests, midcurriculum cumulative exams, and a 1-year follow-up exam assessed baseline knowledge and long-term retention. We used a Likert scale (1=not at all, 5=very much) to assess satisfaction and use of the curriculum in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean weekly scores increased from pretest to posttest and from pretest to final exam for each half curriculum. The mean test score 1 year later was sustained at over 85%. Mean satisfaction and effectiveness scores were 4.6 and 4.5, respectively. When asked how much the curriculum was used in clinical practice, the average score was 4.45.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ambulatory education in residency is often inconsistent, with gaps in published data. We created an approach geared toward modern learners that provided consistent pediatric outpatient education of high-yield topics, was well received, and led to a sustained increase in knowledge. This type of curriculum can be used in other ambulatory settings to improve resident knowledge with minimal interruption to clinical sessions.</p>","PeriodicalId":74494,"journal":{"name":"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)","volume":"9 ","pages":"26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12303148/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22454/PRiMER.2025.929936","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Data on the implementation of successful pediatric ambulatory curricula in residency are limited. Although most pediatric residents pursue careers in primary care, the educational focus in residency training sways toward inpatient medicine. Barriers exist to standardized, consistent teaching in the outpatient clinic. We aimed to create a novel longitudinal ambulatory curriculum focusing on high-yield topics geared toward modern learners that would be well-received and result in retained knowledge.

Methods: Thirty-two pediatric residents were exposed to an 18-month curriculum consisting of 62 high-yield ambulatory topics. Standardized topic guides were taught in brief sessions weekly. Pre- and posttests, midcurriculum cumulative exams, and a 1-year follow-up exam assessed baseline knowledge and long-term retention. We used a Likert scale (1=not at all, 5=very much) to assess satisfaction and use of the curriculum in clinical practice.

Results: Mean weekly scores increased from pretest to posttest and from pretest to final exam for each half curriculum. The mean test score 1 year later was sustained at over 85%. Mean satisfaction and effectiveness scores were 4.6 and 4.5, respectively. When asked how much the curriculum was used in clinical practice, the average score was 4.45.

Conclusions: Ambulatory education in residency is often inconsistent, with gaps in published data. We created an approach geared toward modern learners that provided consistent pediatric outpatient education of high-yield topics, was well received, and led to a sustained increase in knowledge. This type of curriculum can be used in other ambulatory settings to improve resident knowledge with minimal interruption to clinical sessions.

现代住校学习者的流动课程强化教育。
导言:在住院医师中成功实施儿科门诊课程的数据是有限的。虽然大多数儿科住院医师从事初级保健工作,但住院医师培训的教育重点倾向于住院医学。门诊规范化、一致性教学存在障碍。我们的目标是创建一个新颖的纵向流动课程,专注于面向现代学习者的高产主题,这将受到良好的欢迎,并导致保留知识。方法:32名儿科住院医师接受了为期18个月的课程,包括62个高产的门诊主题。标准化的专题指南每周在简短的会议上讲授。前后测试、课程中期累积测试和1年随访测试评估基线知识和长期记忆。我们使用李克特量表(1=根本不,5=非常)来评估临床实践中课程的满意度和使用情况。结果:每半门课程的周平均成绩从前测到后测,从前测到期末均有所提高。1年后的平均测试分数维持在85%以上。平均满意度和有效性分别为4.6分和4.5分。当被问及课程在临床实践中的应用程度时,平均得分为4.45分。结论:住院医师的门诊教育往往不一致,在已发表的数据中存在差距。我们创造了一种面向现代学习者的方法,提供了一致的儿科门诊教育的高产主题,得到了很好的接受,并导致了知识的持续增长。这种类型的课程可用于其他门诊设置,以提高住院医师的知识与最小的中断临床会议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信