Effects of different embryo culture media on birthweight following assisted reproductive technology.

IF 11.1 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Human reproduction open Pub Date : 2025-07-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/hropen/hoaf041
Ming Li, Zhengyang Zhao, Qingqing Tao, Jin Huang, Ying Lian, Yue Li, Shengli Lin, Ping Liu, Qin Li, Rong Li, Jie Qiao
{"title":"Effects of different embryo culture media on birthweight following assisted reproductive technology.","authors":"Ming Li, Zhengyang Zhao, Qingqing Tao, Jin Huang, Ying Lian, Yue Li, Shengli Lin, Ping Liu, Qin Li, Rong Li, Jie Qiao","doi":"10.1093/hropen/hoaf041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study question: </strong>Does the type of embryo culture medium affect the birthweight of newborns conceived by ART?</p><p><strong>Summary answer: </strong>After fresh embryo transfers, singleton newborns in the G5 and HTF groups exhibited higher birthweight <i>z</i>-scores and increased risks of being large for gestational age (LGA) compared to those in the Cook group.</p><p><strong>What is known already: </strong>Current studies have not yet determined whether embryo culture medium affects birthweight and, if such an effect does exist, the significance of embryo culture medium among all the influencing factors is not yet clear.</p><p><strong>Study design size duration: </strong>A retrospective cohort study including 23 403 fresh ET cycles between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2022 at the reproductive medical center of a university-affiliated hospital was conducted.</p><p><strong>Participants/materials setting methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective cohort study including 23 403 fresh ET cycles. Four embryo culture media were analyzed: Cook, G5-PLUS, G5, and HTF. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to evaluate potential associations between embryo culture medium and birthweight <i>z</i>-score. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate potential associations between embryo culture medium and the risk of LGA and macrosomia. Random forest models were constructed to conduct significance analysis of all factors that may affect birthweight <i>z</i>-score.</p><p><strong>Main results and the role of chance: </strong>The cohort comprised 4453, 8460, 7463, and 3027 singletons in the Cook, G5-PLUS, G5, and HTF groups, respectively. Compared to the Cook group, newborns in the G5 and HTF groups had higher birthweight <i>z</i>-scores (increased by 0.069 units, <i>P </i>< 0.001, and 0.073 units, <i>P = </i>0.002, respectively) and higher risks of LGA (OR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.12-1.39, <i>P </i>< 0.001; OR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.05-1.37, <i>P </i>= 0.009, respectively), while newborns in the G5 group also had a higher risk of macrosomia (OR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.06-1.39, <i>P</i> = 0.006). Of the main factors influencing birthweight, the embryo culture medium had a moderate significance.</p><p><strong>Limitations reasons for caution: </strong>Due to commercial and regulatory reasons, various culture media were used for different periods, thus resulting in the different number of cases for the four culture media groups.</p><p><strong>Wider implications of the findings: </strong>Our analysis revealed that the type of embryo culture medium directly affected birthweight <i>z</i>-scores and the risk of LGA and macrosomia in newborns conceived by ART. Consequently, the selection of embryo culture medium should be made cautiously. In addition, there's also a need for more post-market data on culture media for embryology labs.</p><p><strong>Study funding/competing interests: </strong>This study was supported by National Key Research and Development Program of China (2023YFC2705604 and 2024YFC2706900) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82071721, 82371706, and 82288102). All authors have no conflicts of interest to report.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>N/A.</p>","PeriodicalId":73264,"journal":{"name":"Human reproduction open","volume":"2025 3","pages":"hoaf041"},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12296354/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human reproduction open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoaf041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study question: Does the type of embryo culture medium affect the birthweight of newborns conceived by ART?

Summary answer: After fresh embryo transfers, singleton newborns in the G5 and HTF groups exhibited higher birthweight z-scores and increased risks of being large for gestational age (LGA) compared to those in the Cook group.

What is known already: Current studies have not yet determined whether embryo culture medium affects birthweight and, if such an effect does exist, the significance of embryo culture medium among all the influencing factors is not yet clear.

Study design size duration: A retrospective cohort study including 23 403 fresh ET cycles between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2022 at the reproductive medical center of a university-affiliated hospital was conducted.

Participants/materials setting methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study including 23 403 fresh ET cycles. Four embryo culture media were analyzed: Cook, G5-PLUS, G5, and HTF. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to evaluate potential associations between embryo culture medium and birthweight z-score. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate potential associations between embryo culture medium and the risk of LGA and macrosomia. Random forest models were constructed to conduct significance analysis of all factors that may affect birthweight z-score.

Main results and the role of chance: The cohort comprised 4453, 8460, 7463, and 3027 singletons in the Cook, G5-PLUS, G5, and HTF groups, respectively. Compared to the Cook group, newborns in the G5 and HTF groups had higher birthweight z-scores (increased by 0.069 units, P < 0.001, and 0.073 units, P = 0.002, respectively) and higher risks of LGA (OR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.12-1.39, P < 0.001; OR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.05-1.37, P = 0.009, respectively), while newborns in the G5 group also had a higher risk of macrosomia (OR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.06-1.39, P = 0.006). Of the main factors influencing birthweight, the embryo culture medium had a moderate significance.

Limitations reasons for caution: Due to commercial and regulatory reasons, various culture media were used for different periods, thus resulting in the different number of cases for the four culture media groups.

Wider implications of the findings: Our analysis revealed that the type of embryo culture medium directly affected birthweight z-scores and the risk of LGA and macrosomia in newborns conceived by ART. Consequently, the selection of embryo culture medium should be made cautiously. In addition, there's also a need for more post-market data on culture media for embryology labs.

Study funding/competing interests: This study was supported by National Key Research and Development Program of China (2023YFC2705604 and 2024YFC2706900) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82071721, 82371706, and 82288102). All authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

Trial registration number: N/A.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

不同胚胎培养基对辅助生殖技术后出生体重的影响。
研究问题:胚胎培养基的类型是否影响ART受孕新生儿的出生体重?摘要回答:在新鲜胚胎移植后,与库克组相比,G5组和HTF组的单胎新生儿表现出更高的出生体重z分数和更大的胎龄(LGA)风险。已知情况:目前的研究尚未确定胚胎培养基是否会影响出生体重,如果确实存在这种影响,那么胚胎培养基在所有影响因素中的重要性尚不清楚。研究设计规模持续时间:一项回顾性队列研究,包括2010年1月1日至2022年12月31日在一所大学附属医院生殖医学中心进行的23403个新鲜ET周期。参与者/材料设置方法:我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,包括23403个新鲜ET周期。分析四种胚培养基:Cook、G5- plus、G5和HTF。采用多元线性回归分析评估胚胎培养基与出生体重z-score之间的潜在关联。采用Logistic回归分析评估胚胎培养基与LGA和巨大儿风险之间的潜在关联。构建随机森林模型,对所有可能影响出生体重z分数的因素进行显著性分析。主要结果及偶然性的作用:该队列在Cook组、G5- plus组、G5组和HTF组中分别有4453、8460、7463和3027个单胎。与Cook组相比,G5组和HTF组新生儿的出生体重z-score更高(分别增加0.069个单位,P = 0.002), LGA的风险更高(OR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.12-1.39, P = 0.009),而G5组新生儿的巨大儿风险也更高(OR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.06-1.39, P = 0.006)。在影响出生重的主要因素中,胚培养基对出生重的影响中等。注意事项的局限性:由于商业和监管的原因,不同的文化媒介使用的时期不同,导致四个文化传媒集团的案例数量不同。研究结果的更广泛意义:我们的分析显示,胚胎培养基的类型直接影响ART受孕的新生儿出生体重z分数和LGA和巨大儿的风险。因此,应慎重选择胚培养基。此外,胚胎学实验室还需要更多的培养基上市后数据。研究经费/利益竞争:本研究由国家重点研发计划项目(2023YFC2705604和2024YFC2706900)和国家自然科学基金项目(82071721、82371706和82288102)资助。所有作者均无利益冲突需要报告。试验注册号:无。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信