Understanding Rural Patients' Perspectives on Patient Care Teams.

PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.) Pub Date : 2025-06-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.22454/PRiMER.2025.315637
Amy Tite, Brynn Magner, Emily Pierce, Mindy Ann Smith
{"title":"Understanding Rural Patients' Perspectives on Patient Care Teams.","authors":"Amy Tite, Brynn Magner, Emily Pierce, Mindy Ann Smith","doi":"10.22454/PRiMER.2025.315637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>With a critical primary care clinician shortage, team-based care (TBC) is under development to enhance access, especially in rural regions. However, there has been limited discussion about TBC from the patient's perspective. We explored rural patient preferences for composition of their current and ideal primary health care team.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous online survey of rural residents was conducted within the Kootenay-Boundary region of British Columbia. The survey included demographic information and current and ideal health care team composition. Descriptive statistics were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four hundred ninety individuals responded to the survey. Most respondents self-identified as female, were over age 40 years, White, and had a postsecondary school diploma. Those with a health care provider (n=362, 74%) included a primary care doctor (86.5%), alternative medicine practitioner (52.2%), allied health professional (35.4%), friends/family/support people (35.1%), specialist physician (30.1%) and nurse practitioner (18.5%) on their team. Ideal health care teams included a primary care physician (92.2%) followed by an alternative medicine practitioner (64.1%), allied health professionals (61.2%), specialist physician (59.8%), and nurse practitioner (54.8%). Almost half of all respondents (46.6%) chose five or more categories of team members and 43.7% chose 3-4 categories of members. Respondents (81.1%) were highly likely (49.6%) or likely (31.6%) to affiliate with a primary health care team clinic.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both current and ideal health care team membership included many types of caregivers, with most respondents including three or more team-member categories. As many people in rural BC are without primary care providers, incorporating alternative medical practitioners and allied health professions into clinical teams within multidisciplinary settings could improve health care access.</p>","PeriodicalId":74494,"journal":{"name":"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)","volume":"9 ","pages":"29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12303149/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22454/PRiMER.2025.315637","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: With a critical primary care clinician shortage, team-based care (TBC) is under development to enhance access, especially in rural regions. However, there has been limited discussion about TBC from the patient's perspective. We explored rural patient preferences for composition of their current and ideal primary health care team.

Methods: An anonymous online survey of rural residents was conducted within the Kootenay-Boundary region of British Columbia. The survey included demographic information and current and ideal health care team composition. Descriptive statistics were used.

Results: Four hundred ninety individuals responded to the survey. Most respondents self-identified as female, were over age 40 years, White, and had a postsecondary school diploma. Those with a health care provider (n=362, 74%) included a primary care doctor (86.5%), alternative medicine practitioner (52.2%), allied health professional (35.4%), friends/family/support people (35.1%), specialist physician (30.1%) and nurse practitioner (18.5%) on their team. Ideal health care teams included a primary care physician (92.2%) followed by an alternative medicine practitioner (64.1%), allied health professionals (61.2%), specialist physician (59.8%), and nurse practitioner (54.8%). Almost half of all respondents (46.6%) chose five or more categories of team members and 43.7% chose 3-4 categories of members. Respondents (81.1%) were highly likely (49.6%) or likely (31.6%) to affiliate with a primary health care team clinic.

Conclusion: Both current and ideal health care team membership included many types of caregivers, with most respondents including three or more team-member categories. As many people in rural BC are without primary care providers, incorporating alternative medical practitioners and allied health professions into clinical teams within multidisciplinary settings could improve health care access.

了解农村患者对患者护理团队的看法。
导言:由于初级保健临床医生严重短缺,目前正在发展以团队为基础的护理(TBC),以提高可及性,特别是在农村地区。然而,从患者的角度对TBC的讨论有限。我们探讨了农村患者对他们目前和理想的初级卫生保健团队组成的偏好。方法:在不列颠哥伦比亚省库特尼边界地区对农村居民进行匿名在线调查。调查内容包括人口统计信息以及当前和理想的卫生保健团队组成。采用描述性统计。结果:四百九十个人回应了调查。大多数受访者自称为女性,年龄在40岁以上,白人,拥有高等教育文凭。有医疗保健提供者的人(n=362, 74%)包括初级保健医生(86.5%)、替代医学从业者(52.2%)、联合医疗专业人员(35.4%)、朋友/家人/支持人员(35.1%)、专科医生(30.1%)和执业护士(18.5%)。理想的卫生保健团队包括一名初级保健医生(92.2%),其次是一名替代医学医生(64.1%)、联合卫生专业人员(61.2%)、专科医生(59.8%)和执业护士(54.8%)。几乎一半的受访者(46.6%)选择了5个或更多的团队成员类别,43.7%的人选择了3-4个成员类别。受访者(81.1%)极有可能(49.6%)或很有可能(31.6%)加入初级卫生保健团队诊所。结论:当前和理想的医疗保健团队成员包括许多类型的护理人员,大多数受访者包括三个或更多的团队成员类别。由于不列颠哥伦比亚省农村的许多人没有初级保健提供者,将替代医疗从业人员和联合卫生专业人员纳入多学科环境下的临床团队可以改善卫生保健服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信