A Usability Survey of a Quality Improvement Data Visualization Tool Among Medical Intensive Care Unit Nurses.

ACI open Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-05 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1782604
Abigail M Williams, Claire L Davis, Margot Bjoring, Kris Blackstone, Andrew J Barros, Kyle B Enfield
{"title":"A Usability Survey of a Quality Improvement Data Visualization Tool Among Medical Intensive Care Unit Nurses.","authors":"Abigail M Williams, Claire L Davis, Margot Bjoring, Kris Blackstone, Andrew J Barros, Kyle B Enfield","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1782604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cognitive overload is prevalent among intensive care unit (ICU) clinicians. Data visualization may decrease cognitive load by assisting with data interpretation and task prioritization. We developed the Bundle Board to display real-time data from the electronic medical record (EMR), highlighting opportunities for action in standardized ICU patient care. This study evaluates the practical usability of this data visualization tool among nurses in the ICU.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The tool is offered as an application separate from the EMR and was available in the medical ICU for eight months before we surveyed unit nursing staff. To evaluate usability of the tool, we adapted the Health-Information Technology Usability Scale (Health-ITUES) and included an option to provide open-ended feedback. Survey data was analyzed using quantitative and qualitative methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ICU nurses were invited to participate through email and verbal announcements. Of the potential participants, 38% (N=47) responded. The survey demonstrated that the tool was perceived as usable. For each subscale, mean scores were as follows: Perceived Ease of Use 4.40, Impact 4.14, User Control 4.07, and Perceived Usefulness 3.61. There were no significant differences between core and contracted nurses or after stratifying by duration of Bundle Board use. Fifteen respondents completed the optional free-text portion of the survey. Qualitative analysis revealed six subthemes focusing on perceived impacts on quality and safety, cognitive burden and workload, and emotional impact of the Bundle Board.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Bundle Board demonstrated good usability among ICU Nurses, who provided substantive feedback for its improvement. These observations may be generalizable to other comparable interventions. Iterative feedback from end-users is vital to developing and implementing a digital health intervention. Our study provides a framework for performing a usability analysis within a specific clinician population and environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":72041,"journal":{"name":"ACI open","volume":"8 1","pages":"e33-e42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12303040/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACI open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1782604","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cognitive overload is prevalent among intensive care unit (ICU) clinicians. Data visualization may decrease cognitive load by assisting with data interpretation and task prioritization. We developed the Bundle Board to display real-time data from the electronic medical record (EMR), highlighting opportunities for action in standardized ICU patient care. This study evaluates the practical usability of this data visualization tool among nurses in the ICU.

Methods: The tool is offered as an application separate from the EMR and was available in the medical ICU for eight months before we surveyed unit nursing staff. To evaluate usability of the tool, we adapted the Health-Information Technology Usability Scale (Health-ITUES) and included an option to provide open-ended feedback. Survey data was analyzed using quantitative and qualitative methods.

Results: ICU nurses were invited to participate through email and verbal announcements. Of the potential participants, 38% (N=47) responded. The survey demonstrated that the tool was perceived as usable. For each subscale, mean scores were as follows: Perceived Ease of Use 4.40, Impact 4.14, User Control 4.07, and Perceived Usefulness 3.61. There were no significant differences between core and contracted nurses or after stratifying by duration of Bundle Board use. Fifteen respondents completed the optional free-text portion of the survey. Qualitative analysis revealed six subthemes focusing on perceived impacts on quality and safety, cognitive burden and workload, and emotional impact of the Bundle Board.

Conclusions: The Bundle Board demonstrated good usability among ICU Nurses, who provided substantive feedback for its improvement. These observations may be generalizable to other comparable interventions. Iterative feedback from end-users is vital to developing and implementing a digital health intervention. Our study provides a framework for performing a usability analysis within a specific clinician population and environment.

重症监护病房护士质量改进数据可视化工具的可用性调查。
背景:认知超载在重症监护病房(ICU)临床医生中普遍存在。数据可视化可以通过帮助数据解释和任务优先级来减少认知负荷。我们开发了Bundle Board来显示来自电子病历(EMR)的实时数据,强调在标准化ICU患者护理中采取行动的机会。本研究评估了该数据可视化工具在ICU护士中的实际可用性。方法:该工具作为一种独立于电子病历的应用程序提供,在我们对单位护理人员进行调查之前,该工具已在医学ICU中使用了8个月。为了评估该工具的可用性,我们采用了健康信息技术可用性量表(Health-ITUES),并加入了一个提供开放式反馈的选项。采用定量和定性相结合的方法对调查数据进行分析。结果:通过邮件和口头通知的方式邀请ICU护士参与。在潜在参与者中,38% (N=47)做出了回应。调查表明,该工具被认为是可用的。对于每个子量表,平均得分如下:感知易用性4.40,影响4.14,用户控制4.07,感知有用性3.61。核心护士和签约护士之间或按束板使用时间分层后无显著差异。15名受访者完成了调查中可选的自由文本部分。定性分析揭示了六个子主题,重点是对质量和安全的感知影响,认知负担和工作量,以及捆绑板的情感影响。结论:捆绑板在ICU护士中表现出良好的可用性,护士对其改进提供了实质性的反馈。这些观察结果可以推广到其他类似的干预措施。来自最终用户的反复反馈对于制定和实施数字卫生干预措施至关重要。我们的研究为在特定的临床人群和环境中进行可用性分析提供了一个框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信