The Role of Frailty and ASA Classification in Perioperative Risk Stratification for Esophagectomy Patients: A Decade-Long Retrospective Study.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Wongsakorn Chaochankit, Chutida Sungworawongpana
{"title":"The Role of Frailty and ASA Classification in Perioperative Risk Stratification for Esophagectomy Patients: A Decade-Long Retrospective Study.","authors":"Wongsakorn Chaochankit, Chutida Sungworawongpana","doi":"10.1016/j.jopan.2025.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate perioperative risk factors and the predictive accuracy of the modified frailty index (mFI-5) and American Society of Anesthesiologists' Physical Status (ASA-PS) classification in predicting high morbidity following esophagectomy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Predictors of high morbidity were identified using logistic regression, and the performance of mFI-5 and ASA-PS scores was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The high-morbidity rate was 48%. Significant predictors included ASA greater than or equal to 3, preoperative chemoradiotherapy, and prolonged Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and hospital stays. The ASA-PS classification offered better overall accuracy in predicting morbidity. While the mFI-5 showed high sensitivity, it exhibited poor specificity, resulting in a high false-positive rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both mFI-5 and ASA-PS have limitations in predicting high morbidity after esophagectomy. However, a model that integrates various perioperative factors, particularly postoperative variables, demonstrated significance.</p>","PeriodicalId":49028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2025.04.002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate perioperative risk factors and the predictive accuracy of the modified frailty index (mFI-5) and American Society of Anesthesiologists' Physical Status (ASA-PS) classification in predicting high morbidity following esophagectomy.

Design: Retrospective study.

Methods: Predictors of high morbidity were identified using logistic regression, and the performance of mFI-5 and ASA-PS scores was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves.

Findings: The high-morbidity rate was 48%. Significant predictors included ASA greater than or equal to 3, preoperative chemoradiotherapy, and prolonged Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and hospital stays. The ASA-PS classification offered better overall accuracy in predicting morbidity. While the mFI-5 showed high sensitivity, it exhibited poor specificity, resulting in a high false-positive rate.

Conclusions: Both mFI-5 and ASA-PS have limitations in predicting high morbidity after esophagectomy. However, a model that integrates various perioperative factors, particularly postoperative variables, demonstrated significance.

衰弱和ASA分级在食管切除术患者围手术期风险分层中的作用:一项长达十年的回顾性研究。
目的:评价改良虚弱指数(mFI-5)和美国麻醉医师协会身体状态(ASA-PS)分级在预测食管切除术后高发病率中的围手术期危险因素及预测准确性。设计:回顾性研究。方法:采用logistic回归方法确定高发病率的预测因素,并采用受试者工作特征曲线评估mFI-5和ASA-PS评分的表现。结果:高发病率为48%。重要的预测因素包括ASA大于或等于3,术前放化疗,延长重症监护病房(ICU)和住院时间。ASA-PS分类在预测发病率方面提供了更好的总体准确性。虽然mFI-5具有较高的敏感性,但特异性较差,导致假阳性率较高。结论:mFI-5和ASA-PS在预测食管切除术后高发病率方面存在局限性。然而,一个整合了各种围手术期因素,特别是术后变量的模型显示了其重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
17.60%
发文量
279
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing provides original, peer-reviewed research for a primary audience that includes nurses in perianesthesia settings, including ambulatory surgery, preadmission testing, postanesthesia care (Phases I and II), extended observation, and pain management. The Journal provides a forum for sharing professional knowledge and experience relating to management, ethics, legislation, research, and other aspects of perianesthesia nursing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信