The Influence of Primary Femoral Bone Tunnel Position on Postoperative Outcomes and Femoral Bone Tunnel Creation in Revision ACL Reconstruction.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Kazumi Goto, Eisaburo Honda, Shin Sameshima, Miyu Inagawa, Koji Matsuo, Junki Shiota, Hitoshi Takagi, Takaki Sanada
{"title":"The Influence of Primary Femoral Bone Tunnel Position on Postoperative Outcomes and Femoral Bone Tunnel Creation in Revision ACL Reconstruction.","authors":"Kazumi Goto, Eisaburo Honda, Shin Sameshima, Miyu Inagawa, Koji Matsuo, Junki Shiota, Hitoshi Takagi, Takaki Sanada","doi":"10.1055/a-2664-7701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The impact of primary femoral tunnel position on rerupture rates following revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) remains unclear. This study aimed to explore whether the anatomical placement of the primary femoral tunnel affects rerupture risk, tunnel positioning at revision surgery, and postoperative clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Among 165 patients who underwent revision ACLR at our institution between 2018 and 2022, 78 cases with a minimum of two years of follow-up were included. The primary femoral tunnel position was evaluated using Bernard and Hertel's quadrant method on 3D CT scans. Patients were categorized into Group A (anatomical position) and Group N (non-anatomical position). Rerupture rate, tunnel position at revision ACLR, and clinical outcomes were compared between the groups. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on primary surgical technique (single-bundle vs. double-bundle). Additionally, multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of rerupture.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Rerupture occurred in 3 of 39 cases (7.7%) in Group A and 6 of 39 cases (15.4%) in Group N (p = 0.48). There were no significant differences in age, sex, height, weight, sports type, or posterior tibial slope. Anatomical tunnel placement at revision was achieved in 94.9% of Group A and 79.5% of Group N (p = 0.087). No significant differences in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score or Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury scale were observed at two years postoperatively. Subgroup analysis based on primary surgical technique (single-bundle vs. double-bundle) revealed no significant differences in rerupture rates or femoral tunnel positioning at revision. Multivariate logistic regression identified anatomical tunnel placement during the revision surgery as the only independent protective factor against rerupture (odds ratio, 0.145; 95% CI, 0.022-0.951; p = 0.044).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Anatomical tunnel placement during primary ACLR appears to be a key factor associated with a reduced risk of rerupture following revision ACLR. These exploratory findings underscore the importance of accurate tunnel positioning and should be interpreted cautiously due to limited sample size.</p>","PeriodicalId":48798,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Knee Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Knee Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2664-7701","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The impact of primary femoral tunnel position on rerupture rates following revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) remains unclear. This study aimed to explore whether the anatomical placement of the primary femoral tunnel affects rerupture risk, tunnel positioning at revision surgery, and postoperative clinical outcomes.

Methods: Among 165 patients who underwent revision ACLR at our institution between 2018 and 2022, 78 cases with a minimum of two years of follow-up were included. The primary femoral tunnel position was evaluated using Bernard and Hertel's quadrant method on 3D CT scans. Patients were categorized into Group A (anatomical position) and Group N (non-anatomical position). Rerupture rate, tunnel position at revision ACLR, and clinical outcomes were compared between the groups. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on primary surgical technique (single-bundle vs. double-bundle). Additionally, multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of rerupture.

Results: Rerupture occurred in 3 of 39 cases (7.7%) in Group A and 6 of 39 cases (15.4%) in Group N (p = 0.48). There were no significant differences in age, sex, height, weight, sports type, or posterior tibial slope. Anatomical tunnel placement at revision was achieved in 94.9% of Group A and 79.5% of Group N (p = 0.087). No significant differences in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score or Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury scale were observed at two years postoperatively. Subgroup analysis based on primary surgical technique (single-bundle vs. double-bundle) revealed no significant differences in rerupture rates or femoral tunnel positioning at revision. Multivariate logistic regression identified anatomical tunnel placement during the revision surgery as the only independent protective factor against rerupture (odds ratio, 0.145; 95% CI, 0.022-0.951; p = 0.044).

Conclusion: Anatomical tunnel placement during primary ACLR appears to be a key factor associated with a reduced risk of rerupture following revision ACLR. These exploratory findings underscore the importance of accurate tunnel positioning and should be interpreted cautiously due to limited sample size.

原发性股骨隧道位置对改良前交叉韧带重建术后疗效及股骨隧道建立的影响。
目的:股骨隧道位置对前交叉韧带重建术(ACLR)翻修后再破裂率的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨原发性股骨隧道的解剖位置是否会影响再破裂的风险、翻修手术时隧道的定位和术后临床结果。方法:在2018年至2022年期间在我院接受改良ACLR的165例患者中,有78例患者至少随访两年。在三维CT扫描上使用Bernard和Hertel象限法评估股骨隧道的位置。将患者分为解剖体位A组和非解剖体位N组。比较两组间再破裂率、改良ACLR时隧道位置及临床结果。根据主要手术技术(单束与双束)进行亚组分析。此外,进行多变量logistic回归分析以确定再破裂的独立预测因素。结果:A组39例中有3例(7.7%)再发,N组39例中有6例(15.4%)再发,差异有统计学意义(p = 0.48)。年龄、性别、身高、体重、运动类型、胫骨后斜度无显著差异。94.9%的A组和79.5%的N组在翻修时成功放置解剖隧道(p = 0.087)。术后2年,膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分或前十字韧带损伤后恢复运动量表均无显著差异。基于主要手术技术(单束与双束)的亚组分析显示,翻修时再破裂率或股骨隧道定位无显著差异。多因素logistic回归发现,翻修手术中解剖隧道的放置是防止再破裂的唯一独立保护因素(优势比,0.145;95% ci, 0.022-0.951;P = 0.044)。结论:在原发性ACLR中解剖隧道放置似乎是降低改良ACLR后再破裂风险的关键因素。这些探索性发现强调了准确隧道定位的重要性,由于样本量有限,应谨慎解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
139
期刊介绍: The Journal of Knee Surgery covers a range of issues relating to the orthopaedic techniques of arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and reconstructive surgery of the knee joint. In addition to original peer-review articles, this periodical provides details on emerging surgical techniques, as well as reviews and special focus sections. Topics of interest include cruciate ligament repair and reconstruction, bone grafting, cartilage regeneration, and magnetic resonance imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信