Newer versus older implant systems from a single manufacturer and cause-specific revision risk following primary total knee arthroplasty.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Matthew Kelly, Heather Prentice, Brian Fasig, Dhiren Sheth, Nithin Reddy, Monti Khatod, Elizabeth Paxton
{"title":"Newer versus older implant systems from a single manufacturer and cause-specific revision risk following primary total knee arthroplasty.","authors":"Matthew Kelly, Heather Prentice, Brian Fasig, Dhiren Sheth, Nithin Reddy, Monti Khatod, Elizabeth Paxton","doi":"10.1055/a-2664-7627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Novel implant systems have design modifications that seek to improve total knee arthroplasty (TKA) survivorship. We evaluated overall and cause-specific revision risk for a newer generation implant system compared to its predecessor from the same manufacturer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cohort study using data from the United States-based Kaiser Permanente Total Joint Replacement Registry. Adult patients who underwent primary, fully cemented, fixed bearing TKA for osteoarthritis between 2009 to 2022 were identified. Only two implant systems from the manufacturer were included: the newer generation (n=22,287) and the older generation (n=37,105). Multivariable Cox regression was used to evaluate overall and cause-specific aseptic revision risk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the adjusted analyses, no difference in risk was observed for the newer compared to older generation system in the first 4-years follow-up (HR=0.94, 95% CI=0.74-1.19); however, a higher risk was observed after 4-years follow-up (HR=2.09, 95% CI=1.41-3.08). This higher risk was due to loosening (within 4-years: HR=0.90, 95% CI=0.59-1.37; after 4-years: HR=2.88, 95% CI=1.84-4.51); no differences were observed for other revision reasons. When considering constructs utilizing different trays of the newer generation system, the higher risk of revision for loosening was observed only when the first iteration of the tray was used (HR=1.94, 95% CI=1.37-2.77); no difference was observed for constructs utilizing the subsequent iterations of the tray, which underwent design changes, when compared to the older generation TKA system (HR=0.45, 95% CI=0.20-1.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found no survivorship advantage with a newer TKA design compared to a preceding design from the same manufacturer. The higher risk of revision for loosening in the newer generation constructs was limited to those utilizing the first tray iteration, which is now discontinued by the manufacturer. The higher revision risk was not observed with subsequent iterations of the newer generation construct relative to the older generation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48798,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Knee Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Knee Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2664-7627","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Novel implant systems have design modifications that seek to improve total knee arthroplasty (TKA) survivorship. We evaluated overall and cause-specific revision risk for a newer generation implant system compared to its predecessor from the same manufacturer.

Methods: We conducted a cohort study using data from the United States-based Kaiser Permanente Total Joint Replacement Registry. Adult patients who underwent primary, fully cemented, fixed bearing TKA for osteoarthritis between 2009 to 2022 were identified. Only two implant systems from the manufacturer were included: the newer generation (n=22,287) and the older generation (n=37,105). Multivariable Cox regression was used to evaluate overall and cause-specific aseptic revision risk.

Results: In the adjusted analyses, no difference in risk was observed for the newer compared to older generation system in the first 4-years follow-up (HR=0.94, 95% CI=0.74-1.19); however, a higher risk was observed after 4-years follow-up (HR=2.09, 95% CI=1.41-3.08). This higher risk was due to loosening (within 4-years: HR=0.90, 95% CI=0.59-1.37; after 4-years: HR=2.88, 95% CI=1.84-4.51); no differences were observed for other revision reasons. When considering constructs utilizing different trays of the newer generation system, the higher risk of revision for loosening was observed only when the first iteration of the tray was used (HR=1.94, 95% CI=1.37-2.77); no difference was observed for constructs utilizing the subsequent iterations of the tray, which underwent design changes, when compared to the older generation TKA system (HR=0.45, 95% CI=0.20-1.01).

Conclusions: We found no survivorship advantage with a newer TKA design compared to a preceding design from the same manufacturer. The higher risk of revision for loosening in the newer generation constructs was limited to those utilizing the first tray iteration, which is now discontinued by the manufacturer. The higher revision risk was not observed with subsequent iterations of the newer generation construct relative to the older generation.

来自单一制造商的新旧假体系统和初次全膝关节置换术后的病因特异性翻修风险。
背景:新型假体系统的设计改进旨在提高全膝关节置换术(TKA)的生存率。我们评估了新一代植入系统与同一制造商的前身相比的总体和原因特异性翻修风险。方法:我们使用美国Kaiser Permanente全关节置换术登记处的数据进行了一项队列研究。2009年至2022年间接受原发性、完全骨水泥、固定轴承TKA治疗骨关节炎的成年患者被确定。仅包括来自制造商的两种种植体系统:新一代(n=22,287)和老一代(n=37,105)。多变量Cox回归用于评估总体和病因特异性无菌改造风险。结果:在调整后的分析中,在前4年随访中,与老一代系统相比,新一代系统的风险没有差异(HR=0.94, 95% CI=0.74-1.19);然而,随访4年后观察到更高的风险(HR=2.09, 95% CI=1.41-3.08)。这种较高的风险是由于松动(4年内:HR=0.90, 95% CI=0.59-1.37;4年后:HR=2.88, 95% CI=1.84-4.51);其他修订原因未观察到差异。当考虑使用新一代系统的不同托盘时,仅在使用第一次迭代托盘时观察到较高的翻修松动风险(HR=1.94, 95% CI=1.37-2.77);与老一代TKA系统相比,使用随后迭代的托盘进行设计更改的结构没有观察到差异(HR=0.45, 95% CI=0.20-1.01)。结论:我们发现与来自同一制造商的先前设计相比,更新的TKA设计没有生存优势。在新一代结构中,较高的松动修订风险仅限于那些使用第一次托盘迭代的人,现在已由制造商停产。相对于老一代,新一代结构的后续迭代没有观察到更高的修订风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
139
期刊介绍: The Journal of Knee Surgery covers a range of issues relating to the orthopaedic techniques of arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and reconstructive surgery of the knee joint. In addition to original peer-review articles, this periodical provides details on emerging surgical techniques, as well as reviews and special focus sections. Topics of interest include cruciate ligament repair and reconstruction, bone grafting, cartilage regeneration, and magnetic resonance imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信