A comparison of two bolus types for radiotherapy following immediate breast reconstruction.

Abstract

Immediate breast Reconstruction is increasing in use in Australia and accounts for almost 10% of breast cancer patients (Roder in Breast 22:1220-1225, 2013). Many treatments include a bolus to increase dose to the skin surface. Air gaps under bolus increase uncertainty in dosimetry and many bolus types are unable to conform to the shape of the breast or are not flexible throughout treatment if there is a swelling induced contour change. This study investigates the use of two bolus types that can be manufactured in house-wet combine and ThermoBolus. Wet combine is a material composed of several water soaked dressings. ThermoBolus is a product developed in-house that consists of thermoplastic encased in silicone. Plans using a volumetric arc therapy technique were created for each bolus and dosimetry performed with thermoluminescent detectors (TLDs) and EBT-3 film over three fractions. Wax was used to simulate swelling and allow analysis of the flexibility of the bolus materials. ThermoBolus had a range of agreement with calculation from -2 to 4% for film measurement and -5.6 to 1.0% for TLDs. Wet combine had a range of agreement with calculation from 1.6 to 10.5% for film measurement and -13.5 to 13.1% for TLDs. It showed consistent conformity and flexibility for all fractions and with induced contour but air gaps of 2-3 mm were observed between layers of the material. ThermoBolus and wet combine are able to conform to contour change without the introduction of large air gaps between the patient surface and bolus. ThermoBolus is reusable and can be remoulded if the patient undergoes significant contour change during the course of treatment. It is able to be modelled accurately by the treatment planning system. Wet combine shows inconsistency in manufacture and requires more than one bolus to be made over the course of treatment, reducing accuracy in modelling and dosimetry.