Contending with disability-based minority stressors: Adapting the minority stress model to people with disabilities.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Robert B Manning, Rebecca Cipollina, Kathleen R Bogart, Sarah R Lowe, Jonathan M Adler, Joan M Ostrove, Michelle R Nario-Redmond, Katie Wang
{"title":"Contending with disability-based minority stressors: Adapting the minority stress model to people with disabilities.","authors":"Robert B Manning, Rebecca Cipollina, Kathleen R Bogart, Sarah R Lowe, Jonathan M Adler, Joan M Ostrove, Michelle R Nario-Redmond, Katie Wang","doi":"10.1037/rep0000633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose/objective: </strong>People with disabilities (PWDs) are at elevated risk for depression compared to their nondisabled peers (Okoro et al., 2021). Experiences of ableism and emotion dysregulation are identified risk factors for depression among disabled adults (Almeida et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2022). This study applies a minority stress lens, originally developed among sexual minorities, to a sample of PWDs, specifically, by examining distal (i.e., interpersonal and structural ableism) and proximal (i.e., internalized ableism and disability concealment) minority stressors as predictors of emotion dysregulation and depressive symptoms in a cross-disability sample.</p><p><strong>Research method/design: </strong>U.S. adults (<i>N</i> = 162) with a range of disabilities completed an online survey in Fall 2022 assessing all model variables. A cross-sectional mediation analysis examined emotion dysregulation as a mechanism linking distal and proximal minority stressors to depressive symptoms. The model controlled for comorbid disability status to account for differences in depression among participants with multiple disabilities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As hypothesized, emotion dysregulation mediated the relationships between proximal minority stressors, internalized ableism, <i>B</i> = 0.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.02, 0.23], and disability concealment (<i>B</i> = 0.13, 95% CI [0.03, 0.23]) and depressive symptoms. Ableist discrimination had a significant direct effect on depressive symptoms (<i>B</i> = 0.08, <i>p</i> = .008) but not a significant indirect effect through emotion dysregulation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion/implications: </strong>Findings highlight emotion dysregulation as a mechanism through which proximal minority stressors are associated with depressive symptoms among PWDs, underscoring the need to target minority stressors in mental health interventions for disabled adults. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":47974,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitation Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000633","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose/objective: People with disabilities (PWDs) are at elevated risk for depression compared to their nondisabled peers (Okoro et al., 2021). Experiences of ableism and emotion dysregulation are identified risk factors for depression among disabled adults (Almeida et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2022). This study applies a minority stress lens, originally developed among sexual minorities, to a sample of PWDs, specifically, by examining distal (i.e., interpersonal and structural ableism) and proximal (i.e., internalized ableism and disability concealment) minority stressors as predictors of emotion dysregulation and depressive symptoms in a cross-disability sample.

Research method/design: U.S. adults (N = 162) with a range of disabilities completed an online survey in Fall 2022 assessing all model variables. A cross-sectional mediation analysis examined emotion dysregulation as a mechanism linking distal and proximal minority stressors to depressive symptoms. The model controlled for comorbid disability status to account for differences in depression among participants with multiple disabilities.

Results: As hypothesized, emotion dysregulation mediated the relationships between proximal minority stressors, internalized ableism, B = 0.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.02, 0.23], and disability concealment (B = 0.13, 95% CI [0.03, 0.23]) and depressive symptoms. Ableist discrimination had a significant direct effect on depressive symptoms (B = 0.08, p = .008) but not a significant indirect effect through emotion dysregulation.

Conclusion/implications: Findings highlight emotion dysregulation as a mechanism through which proximal minority stressors are associated with depressive symptoms among PWDs, underscoring the need to target minority stressors in mental health interventions for disabled adults. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

与基于残疾的少数压力源抗争:将少数压力模型应用于残疾人。
目的/目的:与非残疾同龄人相比,残疾人(PWDs)患抑郁症的风险更高(Okoro et al., 2021)。残疾歧视和情绪失调经历是残疾成年人抑郁的危险因素(Almeida et al., 2017;Wang et al., 2022)。本研究将最初在性少数群体中开发的少数群体压力透镜应用于残疾人样本,具体而言,通过检查远端(即人际和结构性残疾歧视)和近端(即内化残疾歧视和残疾隐瞒)少数群体压力源作为跨残疾样本中情绪失调和抑郁症状的预测因子。研究方法/设计:美国成年人(N = 162)在2022年秋季完成了一项在线调查,评估了所有模型变量。一项横断面中介分析检验了情绪失调作为远端和近端少数压力源与抑郁症状联系的机制。该模型控制了共病残疾状态,以解释多重残疾参与者的抑郁差异。结果:根据假设,情绪失调介导了近端少数压力源、内化残疾(B = 0.12, 95%可信区间(CI)[0.02, 0.23])和残疾隐瞒(B = 0.13, 95% CI[0.03, 0.23])与抑郁症状之间的关系。体能歧视对抑郁症状有显著的直接影响(B = 0.08, p = 0.008),但对情绪失调的间接影响不显著。结论/启示:研究结果强调了情绪失调是近端少数压力源与残疾患者抑郁症状相关的机制,强调了在残疾成人心理健康干预中针对少数压力源的必要性。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Rehabilitation Psychology is a quarterly peer-reviewed journal that publishes articles in furtherance of the mission of Division 22 (Rehabilitation Psychology) of the American Psychological Association and to advance the science and practice of rehabilitation psychology. Rehabilitation psychologists consider the entire network of biological, psychological, social, environmental, and political factors that affect the functioning of persons with disabilities or chronic illness. Given the breadth of rehabilitation psychology, the journal"s scope is broadly defined.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信