Patients' perceptions of service quality in mobile health apps: the role of Need-for-Touch and physician characteristics in the post-COVID-19 era.

IF 2.2 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Won-Jun Lee, Seungjae Shin
{"title":"Patients' perceptions of service quality in mobile health apps: the role of Need-for-Touch and physician characteristics in the post-COVID-19 era.","authors":"Won-Jun Lee, Seungjae Shin","doi":"10.1108/IJHCQA-12-2024-0116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study explores how doctors' characteristics, including effort, listening, expertise, and credibility, influence patients' perceptions of service quality in mobile health (mHealth) applications in the post-COVID-19 era. It also investigates whether the Need-for-Touch moderates the relationship between doctor-patient rapport and perceived service quality in non-face-to-face consultations.</p><p><strong>Design/methodology/approach: </strong>A survey was conducted among Korean college students who used mHealth applications after the COVID-19 pandemic. A total of 152 valid responses were collected and structural equation modeling was used to evaluate the relationships between doctors' characteristics, rapport, service quality, and the moderating effect of Need-for-Touch.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The results show that doctors' effort, listening, expertise, and credibility significantly enhance patients' perceptions of service quality through rapport-building in mHealth contexts. However, the Need-for-Touch did not moderate the rapport-service quality relationship, indicating that physical presence is less critical in remote healthcare consultations.</p><p><strong>Originality/value: </strong>Previous studies emphasized the importance of Need-for-Touch in face-to-face healthcare environments, highlighting how physical interaction fosters patient trust, satisfaction, and rapport. However, this study shifts the focus to digital healthcare, examining how physician characteristics can compensate for the absence of physical touch in mHealth services. The findings extend current knowledge by demonstrating that service quality can be achieved through non-physical interactions. This perspective offers valuable implications for enhancing mHealth service delivery in the post-COVID-19 era.</p>","PeriodicalId":47455,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE QUALITY ASSURANCE","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE QUALITY ASSURANCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHCQA-12-2024-0116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study explores how doctors' characteristics, including effort, listening, expertise, and credibility, influence patients' perceptions of service quality in mobile health (mHealth) applications in the post-COVID-19 era. It also investigates whether the Need-for-Touch moderates the relationship between doctor-patient rapport and perceived service quality in non-face-to-face consultations.

Design/methodology/approach: A survey was conducted among Korean college students who used mHealth applications after the COVID-19 pandemic. A total of 152 valid responses were collected and structural equation modeling was used to evaluate the relationships between doctors' characteristics, rapport, service quality, and the moderating effect of Need-for-Touch.

Findings: The results show that doctors' effort, listening, expertise, and credibility significantly enhance patients' perceptions of service quality through rapport-building in mHealth contexts. However, the Need-for-Touch did not moderate the rapport-service quality relationship, indicating that physical presence is less critical in remote healthcare consultations.

Originality/value: Previous studies emphasized the importance of Need-for-Touch in face-to-face healthcare environments, highlighting how physical interaction fosters patient trust, satisfaction, and rapport. However, this study shifts the focus to digital healthcare, examining how physician characteristics can compensate for the absence of physical touch in mHealth services. The findings extend current knowledge by demonstrating that service quality can be achieved through non-physical interactions. This perspective offers valuable implications for enhancing mHealth service delivery in the post-COVID-19 era.

患者对移动医疗应用中服务质量的看法:后covid -19时代触摸需求和医生特征的作用
目的:本研究探讨后covid -19时代,医生的特点,包括努力、倾听、专业知识和可信度,如何影响患者对移动医疗(mHealth)应用程序服务质量的看法。它也调查是否需要触摸调节医患关系和感知服务质量在非面对面咨询。设计/方法/方法:对新冠疫情后使用移动健康应用程序的韩国大学生进行了调查。本研究共收集152份有效问卷,采用结构方程模型评估医生特质、融洽关系、服务质量与“触摸需求”的调节效应之间的关系。研究发现:结果表明,医生的努力、倾听、专业知识和可信度,通过在移动医疗环境中建立融洽关系,显著提高了患者对服务质量的看法。然而,接触需求并没有调节融洽关系与服务质量的关系,这表明在远程医疗咨询中,实际存在并不那么重要。原创性/价值:先前的研究强调了面对面医疗环境中触摸需求的重要性,强调了身体互动如何促进患者信任、满意度和融洽关系。然而,这项研究将重点转移到数字医疗保健上,研究医生的特点如何弥补移动医疗服务中缺乏身体接触的缺陷。通过证明服务质量可以通过非物理交互来实现,研究结果扩展了现有的知识。这一观点对加强后covid -19时代的移动医疗服务提供具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
6
期刊介绍: ■Successful quality/continuous improvement projects ■The use of quality tools and models in leadership management development such as the EFQM Excellence Model, Balanced Scorecard, Quality Standards, Managed Care ■Issues relating to process control such as Six Sigma, Leadership, Managing Change and Process Mapping ■Improving patient care through quality related programmes and/or research Articles that use quantitative and qualitative methods are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信