Cost-Utility Analysis of Metabolic Bariatric Surgery for Individuals with Obesity in Saudi Arabia.

IF 2.2 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research Pub Date : 2025-07-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CEOR.S527169
Mouaddh Abdulmalik Nagi, Saowalak Turongkaravee, Ziyad Saeed Almalki, Montarat Thavorncharoensap, Sermsiri Sangroongruangsri, Usa Chaikledkaew, Abdulhadi M Alqahtani, Lamis S AlSharif, Ibrahim A Alsubaihi, Abdulaziz I Alzarea, Mohammed M Alsultan
{"title":"Cost-Utility Analysis of Metabolic Bariatric Surgery for Individuals with Obesity in Saudi Arabia.","authors":"Mouaddh Abdulmalik Nagi, Saowalak Turongkaravee, Ziyad Saeed Almalki, Montarat Thavorncharoensap, Sermsiri Sangroongruangsri, Usa Chaikledkaew, Abdulhadi M Alqahtani, Lamis S AlSharif, Ibrahim A Alsubaihi, Abdulaziz I Alzarea, Mohammed M Alsultan","doi":"10.2147/CEOR.S527169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) is an effective and relatively safe intervention for managing obesity. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-utility of MBS compared with the standard treatment-lifestyle modification plus liraglutide-in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Markov model was developed to estimate the lifetime costs and outcomes of MBS. Costs and outcomes were discounted at an annual rate of 3%. The analysis was conducted from societal and healthcare system perspectives, using a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of one to three times the gross domestic product (GDP) per capita per quality-adjusted life years (QALY) gained. Direct medical and nonmedical costs were obtained from hospital records and patient surveys, respectively. Transitional probabilities and utility values were obtained from published literature and primary data collection in the KSA. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess parameter uncertainty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a lifetime horizon, MBS yielded 0.38 incremental QALY and US$ 11,975 (Saudi Riyal [SAR] 44,905; purchasing power parity [PPP] 23,911) incremental costs, leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of US$ 31,909 (SAR 119,660; PPP 63,717) per QALY gained from a societal perspective and US$ 36,353 (SAR 136,324); PPP 72,590) from a healthcare system perspective. The model was most sensitive to the discount rates of costs and outcomes and the direct medical costs associated with MBS. At a WTP threshold of one GDP per capita (US$ 30,436; SAR 114,135; PPP 60,775), the standard treatment had a 63% probability of being cost-effective. However, at a threshold of approximately 1.8 GDP per capita (US$ 56,000; SAR 210,000; PPP 111,821), MBS was cost-effective in 100% of the iterations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MBS is a cost-effective intervention compared with standard treatment in the context of the KSA. Efforts should be made to expand earlier and equitable access to MBS for individuals with a BMI > 40 kg/m<sup>2</sup> without comorbidities across the country.</p>","PeriodicalId":47313,"journal":{"name":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","volume":"17 ","pages":"519-533"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12301112/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S527169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) is an effective and relatively safe intervention for managing obesity. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-utility of MBS compared with the standard treatment-lifestyle modification plus liraglutide-in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA).

Methods: A Markov model was developed to estimate the lifetime costs and outcomes of MBS. Costs and outcomes were discounted at an annual rate of 3%. The analysis was conducted from societal and healthcare system perspectives, using a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of one to three times the gross domestic product (GDP) per capita per quality-adjusted life years (QALY) gained. Direct medical and nonmedical costs were obtained from hospital records and patient surveys, respectively. Transitional probabilities and utility values were obtained from published literature and primary data collection in the KSA. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess parameter uncertainty.

Results: Over a lifetime horizon, MBS yielded 0.38 incremental QALY and US$ 11,975 (Saudi Riyal [SAR] 44,905; purchasing power parity [PPP] 23,911) incremental costs, leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of US$ 31,909 (SAR 119,660; PPP 63,717) per QALY gained from a societal perspective and US$ 36,353 (SAR 136,324); PPP 72,590) from a healthcare system perspective. The model was most sensitive to the discount rates of costs and outcomes and the direct medical costs associated with MBS. At a WTP threshold of one GDP per capita (US$ 30,436; SAR 114,135; PPP 60,775), the standard treatment had a 63% probability of being cost-effective. However, at a threshold of approximately 1.8 GDP per capita (US$ 56,000; SAR 210,000; PPP 111,821), MBS was cost-effective in 100% of the iterations.

Conclusion: MBS is a cost-effective intervention compared with standard treatment in the context of the KSA. Efforts should be made to expand earlier and equitable access to MBS for individuals with a BMI > 40 kg/m2 without comorbidities across the country.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

沙特阿拉伯肥胖患者代谢性减肥手术的成本-效用分析
背景:代谢减肥手术(MBS)是一种有效且相对安全的治疗肥胖的干预措施。本研究旨在评估沙特阿拉伯王国(KSA) MBS与标准治疗(生活方式改变加利拉鲁肽)的成本-效用。方法:建立马尔可夫模型来估计MBS的生命周期成本和结果。成本和结果的折现率为每年3%。该分析是从社会和医疗保健系统的角度进行的,使用支付意愿(WTP)阈值为获得的每个质量调整生命年(QALY)的人均国内生产总值(GDP)的1至3倍。直接医疗费用和非医疗费用分别从医院记录和患者调查中获得。过渡概率和效用值从发表的文献和KSA的原始数据收集中获得。采用单向和概率敏感性分析来评估参数的不确定性。结果:在一生中,MBS产生了0.38的QALY增量和11,975美元(沙特里亚尔[SAR] 44,905;购买力平价[PPP] 23,911)的增量成本,导致增量成本效益比(ICER)为31,909美元(119,660里亚尔;从社会角度来看,每质量aly获得购买力平价63,717美元和36,353美元(136,324里亚尔);PPP 72,590),从医疗保健系统的角度来看。该模型对成本和结果的贴现率以及与MBS相关的直接医疗成本最为敏感。按世界贸易协定的门槛,人均国内生产总值为1(30,436美元;特别行政区114135;PPP为60,775),标准治疗具有成本效益的概率为63%。但是,在人均国内总产值约为1.8(56,000美元;特别行政区210000;PPP 111,821), MBS在100%的迭代中都具有成本效益。结论:在KSA背景下,与标准治疗相比,MBS是一种具有成本效益的干预措施。应努力在全国范围内扩大BMI指数在40 kg/m2至40 kg/m2之间且无合并症的个人获得MBS的早期和公平机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信