{"title":"To what extent have national learning objectives in undergraduate medical education been achieved? A cross-sectional study of primary care residents.","authors":"Dorothea Dehnen, Kristina Flägel, Dorothea Wild, Jost Steinhäuser","doi":"10.3205/zma001762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>2021 saw the publication of the new version (2.0) of the \"National Competency-based Catalogue of Learning Objectives (NKLM) in Undergraduate Medicine\", which in future will be closely linked to the German medical licensing regulations (ÄApprO). Included in the updated catalogue are specifically defined competencies concerning practical clinical skills. We aimed to determine how residents perceive their competency level to perform selected practical clinical skills in the NKLM 2.0.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In June 2022, all 593 medical residents registered at the competence centers for postgraduate training in primary care in North Rhine, Westphalia-Lippe and Schleswig-Holstein were invited to participate in an online survey. The participants were asked to retrospectively self-assess (1) their proficiency level (5-point Likert scale) at the beginning of their postgraduate training in regard to 36 practical clinical skills from the NKLM 2.0 and (2) where they had gained proficiency in those skills. Of the 164 participating residents, the main focus was on those who had been licensed for less than five years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The responses of 47 residents were analyzed. For 29 skills, at least 20% of the participants stated that these had not been proficiently mastered at the start of postgraduate training; e.g., examining the spine of an adult (19.6%) or the skin (37.0%). For 14 skills - such as examining female and male genitalia and those of newborns and infants - more than 50% of the participants indicated that they had not been able to perform these skills.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results provide initial evidence that discrepancies may exist between the level of desired competency by the end of undergraduate medical education, as specified by the NKLM, and the level of proficiency actually achieved in terms of practical clinical skills. More teaching and feedback methods may need to be established to impart these skills during undergraduate medical education and to integrate these skills into complex clinical contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":45850,"journal":{"name":"GMS Journal for Medical Education","volume":"42 3","pages":"Doc38"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12286870/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GMS Journal for Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3205/zma001762","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: 2021 saw the publication of the new version (2.0) of the "National Competency-based Catalogue of Learning Objectives (NKLM) in Undergraduate Medicine", which in future will be closely linked to the German medical licensing regulations (ÄApprO). Included in the updated catalogue are specifically defined competencies concerning practical clinical skills. We aimed to determine how residents perceive their competency level to perform selected practical clinical skills in the NKLM 2.0.
Method: In June 2022, all 593 medical residents registered at the competence centers for postgraduate training in primary care in North Rhine, Westphalia-Lippe and Schleswig-Holstein were invited to participate in an online survey. The participants were asked to retrospectively self-assess (1) their proficiency level (5-point Likert scale) at the beginning of their postgraduate training in regard to 36 practical clinical skills from the NKLM 2.0 and (2) where they had gained proficiency in those skills. Of the 164 participating residents, the main focus was on those who had been licensed for less than five years.
Results: The responses of 47 residents were analyzed. For 29 skills, at least 20% of the participants stated that these had not been proficiently mastered at the start of postgraduate training; e.g., examining the spine of an adult (19.6%) or the skin (37.0%). For 14 skills - such as examining female and male genitalia and those of newborns and infants - more than 50% of the participants indicated that they had not been able to perform these skills.
Conclusion: The results provide initial evidence that discrepancies may exist between the level of desired competency by the end of undergraduate medical education, as specified by the NKLM, and the level of proficiency actually achieved in terms of practical clinical skills. More teaching and feedback methods may need to be established to impart these skills during undergraduate medical education and to integrate these skills into complex clinical contexts.
期刊介绍:
GMS Journal for Medical Education (GMS J Med Educ) – formerly GMS Zeitschrift für Medizinische Ausbildung – publishes scientific articles on all aspects of undergraduate and graduate education in medicine, dentistry, veterinary medicine, pharmacy and other health professions. Research and review articles, project reports, short communications as well as discussion papers and comments may be submitted. There is a special focus on empirical studies which are methodologically sound and lead to results that are relevant beyond the respective institution, profession or country. Please feel free to submit qualitative as well as quantitative studies. We especially welcome submissions by students. It is the mission of GMS Journal for Medical Education to contribute to furthering scientific knowledge in the German-speaking countries as well as internationally and thus to foster the improvement of teaching and learning and to build an evidence base for undergraduate and graduate education. To this end, the journal has set up an editorial board with international experts. All manuscripts submitted are subjected to a clearly structured peer review process. All articles are published bilingually in English and German and are available with unrestricted open access. Thus, GMS Journal for Medical Education is available to a broad international readership. GMS Journal for Medical Education is published as an unrestricted open access journal with at least four issues per year. In addition, special issues on current topics in medical education research are also published. Until 2015 the journal was published under its German name GMS Zeitschrift für Medizinische Ausbildung. By changing its name to GMS Journal for Medical Education, we wish to underline our international mission.