Lineage Heterogamy and Intimate Partner Violence Among Women in Ghana.

IF 1.7 Q2 SOCIOLOGY
Social Currents Pub Date : 2025-06-11 eCollection Date: 2025-08-01 DOI:10.1177/23294965251338378
Eric Y Tenkorang
{"title":"Lineage Heterogamy and Intimate Partner Violence Among Women in Ghana.","authors":"Eric Y Tenkorang","doi":"10.1177/23294965251338378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined heterogamies based on lineage and their relationship with intimate partner violence (IPV) in Ghana. We used nationally representative cross-sectional data collected in 2017 from 1,789 women aged 18 years and older to build random-effect logit models and examine this relationship. We hypothesized that women in heterogamous unions based on lineage are more likely to experience IPV than those in homogamous unions. Our findings provided weak to no support for the hypothesis. The heterogamy hypothesis held partially for sexual, psychological, and economic violence: patrilineal women married to matrilineal partners were more likely to experience sexual, psychological, and economic violence than matrilineal women with matrilineal partners until their relationship dynamics were controlled. This means variations in IPV between homogamous and heterogamous couples were largely spurious. The biggest and most significant differences were found for homogamous couples. Unlike heterogamous couples, differences in the IPV experiences of homogamous couples persisted after accounting for their socioeconomic characteristics and relationship dynamics. Specifically, patrilineal women with patrilineal male partners were significantly more likely to experience sexual, psychological, and economic violence than matrilineal women with matrilineal male partners. We conclude there is a complex relationship between lineage, socioeconomic status, and other relationship factors in Ghanaian women's vulnerability to IPV.</p>","PeriodicalId":44139,"journal":{"name":"Social Currents","volume":"12 4","pages":"350-369"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12289142/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Currents","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23294965251338378","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined heterogamies based on lineage and their relationship with intimate partner violence (IPV) in Ghana. We used nationally representative cross-sectional data collected in 2017 from 1,789 women aged 18 years and older to build random-effect logit models and examine this relationship. We hypothesized that women in heterogamous unions based on lineage are more likely to experience IPV than those in homogamous unions. Our findings provided weak to no support for the hypothesis. The heterogamy hypothesis held partially for sexual, psychological, and economic violence: patrilineal women married to matrilineal partners were more likely to experience sexual, psychological, and economic violence than matrilineal women with matrilineal partners until their relationship dynamics were controlled. This means variations in IPV between homogamous and heterogamous couples were largely spurious. The biggest and most significant differences were found for homogamous couples. Unlike heterogamous couples, differences in the IPV experiences of homogamous couples persisted after accounting for their socioeconomic characteristics and relationship dynamics. Specifically, patrilineal women with patrilineal male partners were significantly more likely to experience sexual, psychological, and economic violence than matrilineal women with matrilineal male partners. We conclude there is a complex relationship between lineage, socioeconomic status, and other relationship factors in Ghanaian women's vulnerability to IPV.

加纳妇女中的血统、异性婚姻和亲密伴侣暴力。
本研究考察了加纳基于血统的异族通婚及其与亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)的关系。我们使用2017年从1789名18岁及以上女性中收集的具有全国代表性的横断面数据来建立随机效应logit模型并检验这种关系。我们假设,基于血统的异族婚姻的女性比同性婚姻的女性更容易经历IPV。我们的研究结果对这一假设提供了微弱的支持。异性恋假说部分适用于性暴力、心理暴力和经济暴力:与母系伴侣结婚的父系女性比与母系伴侣结婚的母系女性更有可能经历性暴力、心理暴力和经济暴力,直到她们的关系动态得到控制。这意味着同性伴侣和异性伴侣之间IPV的差异很大程度上是虚假的。在同性伴侣中发现了最大和最显著的差异。与异性恋夫妇不同,在考虑到他们的社会经济特征和关系动态后,同性婚姻夫妇在IPV经历上的差异仍然存在。具体来说,有父系男性伴侣的父系女性比有母系男性伴侣的母系女性更容易经历性暴力、心理暴力和经济暴力。我们得出结论,血统、社会经济地位和加纳妇女易患IPV的其他关系因素之间存在复杂的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social Currents
Social Currents SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Social Currents, the official journal of the Southern Sociological Society, is a broad-ranging social science journal that focuses on cutting-edge research from all methodological and theoretical orientations with implications for national and international sociological communities. The uniqueness of Social Currents lies in its format. The front end of every issue is devoted to short, theoretical, agenda-setting contributions and brief, empirical and policy-related pieces. The back end of every issue includes standard journal articles that cover topics within specific subfields of sociology, as well as across the social sciences more broadly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信