Surgeons Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice Toward Preoperative Inflammatory Bowel Disease Medications and Post-Operative Complications.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management Pub Date : 2025-07-22 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/TCRM.S527037
Noura Alhassan, Abdullah Nasser Alnwdel, Mohammed Basem Beyari, Saleh Husam Aldeligan, Reem Alhassan, Maha Hamadien Abdulla, Thamer Bin Traiki
{"title":"Surgeons Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice Toward Preoperative Inflammatory Bowel Disease Medications and Post-Operative Complications.","authors":"Noura Alhassan, Abdullah Nasser Alnwdel, Mohammed Basem Beyari, Saleh Husam Aldeligan, Reem Alhassan, Maha Hamadien Abdulla, Thamer Bin Traiki","doi":"10.2147/TCRM.S527037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Biologics, particularly anti-TNF agents, have transformed the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but concerns about their perioperative safety persist.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluates the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of surgeons in Saudi Arabia regarding the preoperative management of IBD patients undergoing surgery while on biological treatments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 115 surgeons. Participants included general and colorectal surgeons with extensive experience in IBD management. Data were analyzed to assess knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to the impact of biologics, corticosteroids, and immunomodulators on wound healing and postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate of 67.8% and Most surgeons (74.4%) believed biologics negatively affect wound healing, despite evidence suggesting their safety. Corticosteroids were unanimously recognized for their adverse effects, while immunomodulators were widely perceived as safe. A majority preferred tapering biologics and corticosteroids 4 weeks preoperatively but continued immunomodulators. Differences between specialties were observed, with colorectal surgeons demonstrating greater adherence to evidence-based guidelines compared to general surgeons, who expressed more concerns about biologics' risks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study identifies a persistent gap between evidence and practice in the perioperative management of IBD patients on biologics among Saudi surgeons, with general surgeons often stopping biologics due to safety concerns despite evidence of their safety, while colorectal surgeons are more likely to follow current guidelines. Unnecessary cessation may increase disease flare risk, highlighting the need for targeted education and multidisciplinary collaboration to optimize surgical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":22977,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management","volume":"21 ","pages":"1149-1159"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12301140/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S527037","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Biologics, particularly anti-TNF agents, have transformed the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but concerns about their perioperative safety persist.

Objective: This study evaluates the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of surgeons in Saudi Arabia regarding the preoperative management of IBD patients undergoing surgery while on biological treatments.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 115 surgeons. Participants included general and colorectal surgeons with extensive experience in IBD management. Data were analyzed to assess knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to the impact of biologics, corticosteroids, and immunomodulators on wound healing and postoperative complications.

Results: The response rate of 67.8% and Most surgeons (74.4%) believed biologics negatively affect wound healing, despite evidence suggesting their safety. Corticosteroids were unanimously recognized for their adverse effects, while immunomodulators were widely perceived as safe. A majority preferred tapering biologics and corticosteroids 4 weeks preoperatively but continued immunomodulators. Differences between specialties were observed, with colorectal surgeons demonstrating greater adherence to evidence-based guidelines compared to general surgeons, who expressed more concerns about biologics' risks.

Conclusion: This study identifies a persistent gap between evidence and practice in the perioperative management of IBD patients on biologics among Saudi surgeons, with general surgeons often stopping biologics due to safety concerns despite evidence of their safety, while colorectal surgeons are more likely to follow current guidelines. Unnecessary cessation may increase disease flare risk, highlighting the need for targeted education and multidisciplinary collaboration to optimize surgical outcomes.

外科医生对术前炎症性肠病药物治疗和术后并发症的知识、态度和实践。
背景:生物制剂,特别是抗肿瘤坏死因子制剂,已经改变了炎症性肠病(IBD)的治疗,但对其围手术期安全性的担忧仍然存在。目的:本研究评估沙特阿拉伯外科医生对IBD手术患者同时进行生物治疗的术前管理的知识、态度和做法。方法:对115名外科医生进行横断面调查。参与者包括在IBD管理方面具有丰富经验的普通外科医生和结直肠外科医生。对数据进行分析,以评估有关生物制剂、皮质类固醇和免疫调节剂对伤口愈合和术后并发症影响的知识、态度和做法。结果:有效率为67.8%,大多数外科医生(74.4%)认为生物制剂对伤口愈合有负面影响,尽管有证据表明其安全性。人们一致认为皮质类固醇有不良反应,而免疫调节剂则普遍认为是安全的。大多数患者倾向于术前4周逐渐减量的生物制剂和皮质类固醇,但继续使用免疫调节剂。观察到不同专业之间的差异,与普通外科医生相比,结直肠外科医生更遵守循证指南,而普通外科医生对生物制剂的风险表达了更多的担忧。结论:本研究确定了沙特外科医生在IBD患者使用生物制剂的围手术期管理方面的证据与实践之间存在持续差距,尽管有证据表明生物制剂的安全性,但普通外科医生往往出于安全考虑而停止使用生物制剂,而结直肠外科医生更有可能遵循现行指南。不必要的停止可能会增加疾病爆发的风险,强调有针对性的教育和多学科合作的必要性,以优化手术结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.60%
发文量
139
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management is an international, peer-reviewed journal of clinical therapeutics and risk management, focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies in all therapeutic areas, outcomes, safety, and programs for the effective, safe, and sustained use of medicines, therapeutic and surgical interventions in all clinical areas. The journal welcomes submissions covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary. The journal will consider case reports but only if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. As of 18th March 2019, Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信