A pharmacoeconomic study using the willingness to pay model for postexposure prophylaxis for animal bites at a public sector tertiary referral center.

Q2 Medicine
Perspectives in Clinical Research Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-29 DOI:10.4103/picr.picr_179_24
Roopa Parida, Nithya Jaideep Gogtay, Vijaya Laxman Chaudhari, Ananya Rakshit, Balaji Mane, Prachi V Bhoir, Vipin Subhash Mokalkar
{"title":"A pharmacoeconomic study using the willingness to pay model for postexposure prophylaxis for animal bites at a public sector tertiary referral center.","authors":"Roopa Parida, Nithya Jaideep Gogtay, Vijaya Laxman Chaudhari, Ananya Rakshit, Balaji Mane, Prachi V Bhoir, Vipin Subhash Mokalkar","doi":"10.4103/picr.picr_179_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Rabies is a neglected, vaccine-preventable, zoonotic, viral disease that affecting the central nervous system. Understanding its economic burden will aid in developing strategies to reduce mortality.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aims of this study were to assess willingness to pay (WTP) for postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) for anti-rabies vaccination (ARV).</p><p><strong>Setting and design: </strong>This was a a cross-sectional, interview based, pharmacoeconomic study.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>After ethics approval and written informed consent, patients visiting the institute for PEP were enrolled and explained the bidding game strategy, and details of their socioeconomic strata (SES) were collected. Participants were asked regarding the WTP with a predecided starting bid amount of Indian rupees (INR) 2500/- for complete ARV. Based on their first response, this amount was either reduced or increased by INR 500/- until a final WTP reached. This was similarly done for travel and supporting medications.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>Both descriptive and inferential (regression) statistics were applied. WTP was taken as the dependent variable, whereas demographic and animal bite-related parameters were taken as independent covariates. All analyses were done at 5% significance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of <i>n</i> = 426 patients were enrolled. Of these, 255/426 (60%) patients were of Category III, whereas the remainder 171/426 (40%) were of Category II. Most of the patients (<i>n</i> = 306/426 [72%]-ARV, <i>n</i> = 270/426 [63%]-traveling and <i>n</i> = 277/426 [65%]-supporting medications) choose less than the bidding amount for all three aspects studied. Regression analysis showed that higher SES when the bite was from a dog and transdermal bites were significantly associated with a higher WTP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lower socioeconomic strata are associated with lower WTP. Although this is challenging to address, raising awareness about completing vaccinations is crucial, as rabies is 100% fatal once the central nervous system is affected and clinical symptoms appear.</p>","PeriodicalId":20015,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in Clinical Research","volume":"16 3","pages":"156-161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12288922/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives in Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/picr.picr_179_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Rabies is a neglected, vaccine-preventable, zoonotic, viral disease that affecting the central nervous system. Understanding its economic burden will aid in developing strategies to reduce mortality.

Aims: The aims of this study were to assess willingness to pay (WTP) for postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) for anti-rabies vaccination (ARV).

Setting and design: This was a a cross-sectional, interview based, pharmacoeconomic study.

Subjects and methods: After ethics approval and written informed consent, patients visiting the institute for PEP were enrolled and explained the bidding game strategy, and details of their socioeconomic strata (SES) were collected. Participants were asked regarding the WTP with a predecided starting bid amount of Indian rupees (INR) 2500/- for complete ARV. Based on their first response, this amount was either reduced or increased by INR 500/- until a final WTP reached. This was similarly done for travel and supporting medications.

Statistical analysis used: Both descriptive and inferential (regression) statistics were applied. WTP was taken as the dependent variable, whereas demographic and animal bite-related parameters were taken as independent covariates. All analyses were done at 5% significance.

Results: A total of n = 426 patients were enrolled. Of these, 255/426 (60%) patients were of Category III, whereas the remainder 171/426 (40%) were of Category II. Most of the patients (n = 306/426 [72%]-ARV, n = 270/426 [63%]-traveling and n = 277/426 [65%]-supporting medications) choose less than the bidding amount for all three aspects studied. Regression analysis showed that higher SES when the bite was from a dog and transdermal bites were significantly associated with a higher WTP.

Conclusion: Lower socioeconomic strata are associated with lower WTP. Although this is challenging to address, raising awareness about completing vaccinations is crucial, as rabies is 100% fatal once the central nervous system is affected and clinical symptoms appear.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在公共部门三级转诊中心使用支付意愿模型进行动物咬伤暴露后预防的药物经济学研究。
背景:狂犬病是一种被忽视的、疫苗可预防的、人畜共患的、影响中枢神经系统的病毒性疾病。了解其经济负担将有助于制定降低死亡率的战略。目的:本研究的目的是评估暴露后预防抗狂犬病疫苗接种(ARV)的支付意愿(WTP)。环境与设计:这是一项基于访谈的横断面药物经济学研究。受试者和方法:经伦理审批和书面知情同意后,入组到研究所进行PEP的患者,并向其解释竞价游戏策略,收集其社会经济阶层(SES)的详细信息。参与者被问及关于WTP的问题,预先确定的起始出价为2500印度卢比(INR) /-完整的ARV。根据他们的第一次反应,这一数额要么减少,要么增加500卢比,直到达到最终的WTP。这同样适用于旅行和辅助药物。使用的统计分析:采用描述性和推理性(回归)统计。以WTP为因变量,人口统计学参数和动物咬伤相关参数为自变量。所有分析均以5%显著性进行。结果:共纳入n = 426例患者。其中,255/426(60%)患者为III类,其余171/426(40%)为II类。大多数患者(n = 306/426 [72%]-ARV, n = 270/426[63%]-旅行,n = 277/426[65%]-支持药物)在三个方面均选择低于招标金额。回归分析显示,狗咬伤和透皮咬伤的SES越高,WTP越高。结论:低社会经济阶层与低WTP相关。尽管解决这一问题具有挑战性,但提高对完成疫苗接种的认识至关重要,因为一旦中枢神经系统受到影响并出现临床症状,狂犬病是100%致命的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Perspectives in Clinical Research
Perspectives in Clinical Research Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: This peer review quarterly journal is positioned to build a learning clinical research community in India. This scientific journal will have a broad coverage of topics across clinical research disciplines including clinical research methodology, research ethics, clinical data management, training, data management, biostatistics, regulatory and will include original articles, reviews, news and views, perspectives, and other interesting sections. PICR will offer all clinical research stakeholders in India – academicians, ethics committees, regulators, and industry professionals -a forum for exchange of ideas, information and opinions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信