Maja Furlan de Brito, Lucy E Selman, Alexandra Coelho, Barbara Gomes
{"title":"Surveying the quality of bereavement support within a service setting: A pilot study using cognitive interviewing with bereaved people.","authors":"Maja Furlan de Brito, Lucy E Selman, Alexandra Coelho, Barbara Gomes","doi":"10.1177/02692163251353012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Provision of bereavement care is not standard practice in palliative care, meaning routinely collected data to understand support quality at a service level is scarce. Survey research can fill this gap.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To pilot and refine a survey and the survey method to measure the quality and variations in bereavement support at a service level.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cognitive interview study. In analysis we used a combination of reparative and descriptive cognitive interview approaches to ascertain measurement errors and any participation distress.</p><p><strong>Setting/participants: </strong>People bereaved due to cancer (13-19 months post death) were consecutively recruited via a hospital-based palliative care service.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty bereaved people participated (parental bereavement 8/20, partner 7/20, sibling 3/20, adult child 2/20); median age 59 (range 28-76), 6 men. Cancer deaths occurred 16-19 months before the interview. Identified measurement errors, mostly related to comprehension, were fixed. We refined the definition of bereavement support in the context of the survey and reordered the sections to reduce emotional burden and improve time completion. Participating in the survey was considered distressing yet personally valuable, relevant and important for improving bereavement support.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We developed, piloted and refined a survey to assess quality and variations in bereavement support which can be used by palliative care services in clinical practice for quality improvement. Survey participation, while potentially distressing, was acceptable to and valued by bereaved people.</p>","PeriodicalId":19849,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"884-896"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12405657/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163251353012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Provision of bereavement care is not standard practice in palliative care, meaning routinely collected data to understand support quality at a service level is scarce. Survey research can fill this gap.
Aim: To pilot and refine a survey and the survey method to measure the quality and variations in bereavement support at a service level.
Design: Cognitive interview study. In analysis we used a combination of reparative and descriptive cognitive interview approaches to ascertain measurement errors and any participation distress.
Setting/participants: People bereaved due to cancer (13-19 months post death) were consecutively recruited via a hospital-based palliative care service.
Results: Twenty bereaved people participated (parental bereavement 8/20, partner 7/20, sibling 3/20, adult child 2/20); median age 59 (range 28-76), 6 men. Cancer deaths occurred 16-19 months before the interview. Identified measurement errors, mostly related to comprehension, were fixed. We refined the definition of bereavement support in the context of the survey and reordered the sections to reduce emotional burden and improve time completion. Participating in the survey was considered distressing yet personally valuable, relevant and important for improving bereavement support.
Conclusions: We developed, piloted and refined a survey to assess quality and variations in bereavement support which can be used by palliative care services in clinical practice for quality improvement. Survey participation, while potentially distressing, was acceptable to and valued by bereaved people.
期刊介绍:
Palliative Medicine is a highly ranked, peer reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to improving knowledge and clinical practice in the palliative care of patients with far advanced disease. This outstanding journal features editorials, original papers, review articles, case reports, correspondence and book reviews. Essential reading for all members of the palliative care team. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).