Arthroplasty versus fixation of femoral neck fractures in non-geriatric patients.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Kyle S Jamar, Kennedy J Ringelberg, Joshua A Parry
{"title":"Arthroplasty versus fixation of femoral neck fractures in non-geriatric patients.","authors":"Kyle S Jamar, Kennedy J Ringelberg, Joshua A Parry","doi":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000003051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare arthroplasty versus fixation of femoral neck fractures (FNFs) in non-geriatric patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Design: Retrospective.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Level one trauma center.</p><p><strong>Patients selection criteria: </strong>Adults with FNFs (OTA/AO 31-B) less than 65 years of age.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and comparisons: </strong>Arthroplasty and fixation groups were compared in terms of major complications (nonunion, deep infection, etc.) and reoperations. Subgroup analysis of total hip arthroplasty (THA) versus fixation of displaced FNFs was performed using propensity score matching. Variables associated with complications after fixation were evaluated for.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-four patients were included; 47 received arthroplasty and 47 received fixation. The arthroplasty group was older (59.0 vs 40.0 years, p<0.0001), had more low-energy mechanisms (76.6% vs. 29.8%, p<0.0001), more displaced fractures (97.9% vs. 76.6%, p=0.003), and did not differ in proportion of males (61.7% vs. 70.2%, p=0.51), or follow-up duration (16.0 vs 10.6 months, p=0.08). The arthroplasty group was less likely to have a major complication (17.0% vs. 42.5%, p=0.01) or reoperation (12.8% vs. 31.9%, p=0.04). Patients treated with THA (n=19), compared to those with displaced fractures that were fixed (n=36), were older (61.0 vs. 37.5 years, p<0.0001), more likely to have low-energy injuries (63.1% vs. 25.0%, p=0.008), and less likely to have an ASA >2 (15.8% vs. 55.6%, p=0.008). After matching for these differences, there were 10 patients per group. The complication rate was lower in the THA group (0.0% vs. 50.0%, p=0.03) and the reoperation rate was similar (0.0% vs. 20.0%, p=0.47). Patients that had a complication after fracture fixation were more likely to have fracture comminution (70.0% vs. 22.2%, p=0.002), greater initial fracture displacement (14.5 vs. 6.7 mm; p=0.0002), and buttress plate fixation (20.0% vs. 0.0%; p=0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Arthroplasty, compared to fixation, resulted in fewer major complications and reoperations. Major complications after fixation were associated with initial fracture displacement and comminution.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>3, retrospective comparison.</p>","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000003051","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To compare arthroplasty versus fixation of femoral neck fractures (FNFs) in non-geriatric patients.

Methods: Design: Retrospective.

Setting: Level one trauma center.

Patients selection criteria: Adults with FNFs (OTA/AO 31-B) less than 65 years of age.

Outcome measures and comparisons: Arthroplasty and fixation groups were compared in terms of major complications (nonunion, deep infection, etc.) and reoperations. Subgroup analysis of total hip arthroplasty (THA) versus fixation of displaced FNFs was performed using propensity score matching. Variables associated with complications after fixation were evaluated for.

Results: Ninety-four patients were included; 47 received arthroplasty and 47 received fixation. The arthroplasty group was older (59.0 vs 40.0 years, p<0.0001), had more low-energy mechanisms (76.6% vs. 29.8%, p<0.0001), more displaced fractures (97.9% vs. 76.6%, p=0.003), and did not differ in proportion of males (61.7% vs. 70.2%, p=0.51), or follow-up duration (16.0 vs 10.6 months, p=0.08). The arthroplasty group was less likely to have a major complication (17.0% vs. 42.5%, p=0.01) or reoperation (12.8% vs. 31.9%, p=0.04). Patients treated with THA (n=19), compared to those with displaced fractures that were fixed (n=36), were older (61.0 vs. 37.5 years, p<0.0001), more likely to have low-energy injuries (63.1% vs. 25.0%, p=0.008), and less likely to have an ASA >2 (15.8% vs. 55.6%, p=0.008). After matching for these differences, there were 10 patients per group. The complication rate was lower in the THA group (0.0% vs. 50.0%, p=0.03) and the reoperation rate was similar (0.0% vs. 20.0%, p=0.47). Patients that had a complication after fracture fixation were more likely to have fracture comminution (70.0% vs. 22.2%, p=0.002), greater initial fracture displacement (14.5 vs. 6.7 mm; p=0.0002), and buttress plate fixation (20.0% vs. 0.0%; p=0.02).

Conclusions: Arthroplasty, compared to fixation, resulted in fewer major complications and reoperations. Major complications after fixation were associated with initial fracture displacement and comminution.

Level of evidence: 3, retrospective comparison.

非老年患者股骨颈骨折的关节置换术与固定。
目的:比较非老年患者股骨颈骨折(FNFs)的关节置换术与固定术。方法:设计:回顾性。地点:一级创伤中心。患者选择标准:年龄小于65岁的成人FNFs (OTA/AO 31-B)。结果测量和比较:比较关节置换术组和固定术组的主要并发症(骨不连、深部感染等)和再手术情况。采用倾向评分匹配对全髋关节置换术(THA)与移位的fnf固定进行亚组分析。评估固定后并发症的相关变量。结果:纳入94例患者;47例接受关节置换术,47例接受固定。关节置换术组年龄较大(59.0岁vs 40.0岁,p=0.008)。在对这些差异进行匹配后,每组有10名患者。THA组并发症发生率较低(0.0%比50.0%,p=0.03),再手术率相近(0.0%比20.0%,p=0.47)。骨折固定后出现并发症的患者更容易发生骨折粉碎(70.0%比22.2%,p=0.002),更大的初始骨折移位(14.5比6.7 mm;P =0.0002),支撑板固定(20.0% vs. 0.0%;p = 0.02)。结论:与固定相比,关节置换术的主要并发症和再手术较少。固定后的主要并发症与初始骨折移位和粉碎有关。证据水平:3,回顾性比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma is devoted exclusively to the diagnosis and management of hard and soft tissue trauma, including injuries to bone, muscle, ligament, and tendons, as well as spinal cord injuries. Under the guidance of a distinguished international board of editors, the journal provides the most current information on diagnostic techniques, new and improved surgical instruments and procedures, surgical implants and prosthetic devices, bioplastics and biometals; and physical therapy and rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信