Exercise prescription in the management of chronic disease falling through an evidence-practice gap: Perspectives of doctors and nurses in specialist settings.
Shelley E Keating, Shelley A Wilkinson, Graeme A Macdonald, Ingrid J Hickman, Hannah L Mayr
{"title":"Exercise prescription in the management of chronic disease falling through an evidence-practice gap: Perspectives of doctors and nurses in specialist settings.","authors":"Shelley E Keating, Shelley A Wilkinson, Graeme A Macdonald, Ingrid J Hickman, Hannah L Mayr","doi":"10.1177/13558196251362133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesExercise is a frontline therapy for the management of chronic cardiometabolic disease, however traditional tertiary health care service models do not include exercise physiology. We aimed to explore professional roles, practices, and services regarding exercise care in chronic cardiometabolic disease from the perspectives of specialist doctors and nurses.MethodsUsing a qualitative description design, semi-structured individual interviews were conducted with 32 doctors and 26 nurses involved in the care of relevant patients with liver, kidney, or cardiac disease, or diabetes, across hospital and community settings in a Queensland metropolitan health service. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis.ResultsFour overarching themes were identified. Despite universal acceptance of the multifactorial benefits of exercise, there was a lack of confidence in patients' capabilities to exercise and safety concerns due to complex comorbidities. Interviewees considered themselves 'promotors not prescribers' of exercise. There was no structured exercise history taken outside of cardiac rehabilitation units with significant variability in advice provided. Access to exercise specialist services was limited and disease-specific, with inconsistent and fragmented referral pathways. General Practitioners were considered responsible for facilitating exercise specialist involvement in ongoing care, with onus placed on patients to initiate.ConclusionsThere is an evidence-practice gap between the established benefits of exercise for chronic disease management and access to exercise professionals and services, resources, and knowledge. This deprioritises exercise as a frontline therapy with patient care implications. This study identified a need to transform the way that exercise care is accessed and delivered in tertiary settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":15953,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","volume":" ","pages":"270-281"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13558196251362133","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ObjectivesExercise is a frontline therapy for the management of chronic cardiometabolic disease, however traditional tertiary health care service models do not include exercise physiology. We aimed to explore professional roles, practices, and services regarding exercise care in chronic cardiometabolic disease from the perspectives of specialist doctors and nurses.MethodsUsing a qualitative description design, semi-structured individual interviews were conducted with 32 doctors and 26 nurses involved in the care of relevant patients with liver, kidney, or cardiac disease, or diabetes, across hospital and community settings in a Queensland metropolitan health service. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis.ResultsFour overarching themes were identified. Despite universal acceptance of the multifactorial benefits of exercise, there was a lack of confidence in patients' capabilities to exercise and safety concerns due to complex comorbidities. Interviewees considered themselves 'promotors not prescribers' of exercise. There was no structured exercise history taken outside of cardiac rehabilitation units with significant variability in advice provided. Access to exercise specialist services was limited and disease-specific, with inconsistent and fragmented referral pathways. General Practitioners were considered responsible for facilitating exercise specialist involvement in ongoing care, with onus placed on patients to initiate.ConclusionsThere is an evidence-practice gap between the established benefits of exercise for chronic disease management and access to exercise professionals and services, resources, and knowledge. This deprioritises exercise as a frontline therapy with patient care implications. This study identified a need to transform the way that exercise care is accessed and delivered in tertiary settings.
期刊介绍：
Journal of Health Services Research & Policy provides a unique opportunity to explore the ideas, policies and decisions shaping health services throughout the world. Edited and peer-reviewed by experts in the field and with a high academic standard and multidisciplinary approach, readers will gain a greater understanding of the current issues in healthcare policy and research. The journal"s strong international editorial advisory board also ensures that readers obtain a truly global and insightful perspective.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
