Plain language summaries supporting patient involvement: lessons and guidance from HTAi Patient and Citizen Involvement Interest Group (PCIG).

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Martin Andrew Coombes, Kate Morgan, Jose Diaz, Elisabeth M Oehrlein, Hayley Andersen, Ramiro Gilardino, Kawitha Helme, Fiona Pearce, Antonella Cardone
{"title":"Plain language summaries supporting patient involvement: lessons and guidance from HTAi Patient and Citizen Involvement Interest Group (PCIG).","authors":"Martin Andrew Coombes, Kate Morgan, Jose Diaz, Elisabeth M Oehrlein, Hayley Andersen, Ramiro Gilardino, Kawitha Helme, Fiona Pearce, Antonella Cardone","doi":"10.1017/S0266462325100408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patient involvement is an increasingly recognized cornerstone of effective Health Technology Assessment (HTA). Clear, accessible information empowers patient organizations to contribute meaningfully to HTA. Therefore, an international Summary Information for Patient Groups template was developed to provide plain language summaries of new medicines being assessed. Pilots using the template were conducted in Australia in 2021 and England in 2022, providing a trial within the HTA process. In Australia, the Consumer Evidence and Engagement Unit (CEEU) used a workshop and survey, together with key stakeholder interviews, to gather feedback. In England, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence used public consultation, surveys, and a Short-Life Working Group (SLWG). An advisory board with patient organizations provided additional insights. The feedback enabled members of the HTA International Patient and Citizen Involvement in HTA Interest Group to evaluate the potential to enhance patient organization submissions to HTA bodies and to provide recommendations on the template's implementation in HTA processes. The pilots highlighted that plain language summaries increased confidence and reduced preparation time for patient organization input to HTA. Other nonexpert stakeholders also found them valuable for fostering understanding. However, challenges remain, including mitigating bias in completed templates, allocating sufficient resources, and integrating into existing processes. The evaluation concludes that the approach holds significant potential to enhance patient organization involvement in HTA. Recommendations include setting up multi-stakeholder SLWGs, ensuring early access to summaries, and aligning implementation with local regulations. These insights provide guidance for HTA bodies to develop an approach to support patient involvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":14467,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"e59"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12390740/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462325100408","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patient involvement is an increasingly recognized cornerstone of effective Health Technology Assessment (HTA). Clear, accessible information empowers patient organizations to contribute meaningfully to HTA. Therefore, an international Summary Information for Patient Groups template was developed to provide plain language summaries of new medicines being assessed. Pilots using the template were conducted in Australia in 2021 and England in 2022, providing a trial within the HTA process. In Australia, the Consumer Evidence and Engagement Unit (CEEU) used a workshop and survey, together with key stakeholder interviews, to gather feedback. In England, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence used public consultation, surveys, and a Short-Life Working Group (SLWG). An advisory board with patient organizations provided additional insights. The feedback enabled members of the HTA International Patient and Citizen Involvement in HTA Interest Group to evaluate the potential to enhance patient organization submissions to HTA bodies and to provide recommendations on the template's implementation in HTA processes. The pilots highlighted that plain language summaries increased confidence and reduced preparation time for patient organization input to HTA. Other nonexpert stakeholders also found them valuable for fostering understanding. However, challenges remain, including mitigating bias in completed templates, allocating sufficient resources, and integrating into existing processes. The evaluation concludes that the approach holds significant potential to enhance patient organization involvement in HTA. Recommendations include setting up multi-stakeholder SLWGs, ensuring early access to summaries, and aligning implementation with local regulations. These insights provide guidance for HTA bodies to develop an approach to support patient involvement.

支持患者参与的简单语言摘要。病人及市民参与兴趣小组的经验教训及指引。
患者参与是有效的卫生技术评估(HTA)日益公认的基石。清晰、可访问的信息使患者组织能够为HTA做出有意义的贡献。因此,开发了一个国际患者群体摘要信息模板,以提供正在评估的新药的简明语言摘要。使用该模板的试点分别于2021年在澳大利亚和2022年在英国进行,在HTA流程中进行了试验。在澳大利亚,消费者证据和参与小组(CEEU)利用研讨会和调查,以及主要利益相关者访谈来收集反馈。在英格兰,国家健康和护理卓越研究所采用了公众咨询、调查和短寿命工作组(SLWG)。由患者组织组成的咨询委员会提供了额外的见解。这些反馈使HTA国际患者和公民参与HTA兴趣小组的成员能够评估加强患者组织向HTA机构提交的文件的潜力,并就模板在HTA流程中的实施提供建议。试点强调,简单的语言摘要增加了信心,减少了患者组织向HTA输入的准备时间。其他非专家利益相关者也发现它们对于促进理解很有价值。然而,挑战仍然存在,包括减轻已完成模板中的偏见,分配足够的资源,以及集成到现有流程中。评估的结论是,该方法具有显著的潜力,以提高患者组织参与HTA。建议包括建立多利益相关者slwg,确保尽早获得摘要,并使实施与当地法规保持一致。这些见解为HTA机构制定支持患者参与的方法提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
15.60%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care serves as a forum for the wide range of health policy makers and professionals interested in the economic, social, ethical, medical and public health implications of health technology. It covers the development, evaluation, diffusion and use of health technology, as well as its impact on the organization and management of health care systems and public health. In addition to general essays and research reports, regular columns on technology assessment reports and thematic sections are published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信