Exploration on Bubble Entropy.

IF 6.8 2区 医学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
George Manis, Dimitrios Platakis, Roberto Sassi
{"title":"Exploration on Bubble Entropy.","authors":"George Manis, Dimitrios Platakis, Roberto Sassi","doi":"10.1109/JBHI.2025.3593153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bubble entropy is a recently proposed entropy metric. Having certain advantages over popular definitions, bubble entropy finds its place in the research community map. It belongs to the family of entropy estimators which embed the signal into an m-dimensional space. Two are the main drawbacks for which those methods are criticized: the high computational cost and the dependence on parameters. Bubble entropy can be an answer to both, since computation can be performed in linear time and the dependence on parameters can be considered minimal in many practical situations. Popular entropy definitions, which are built over an embedding of the signal, mainly rely on two parameters: the size of the embedding space m and a tolerance r, which set a threshold over the distance between two points in the m-dimensional space to be considered similar. Bubble entropy totally eliminates the necessity to define a threshold distance, while it largely decouples the entropy estimation from the selection of the actual size of the embedding space in stationary conditions. Bubble entropy is compared to popular entropy definitions on theoretical and experimental basis. Theoretical analyses reveal significant advantages. Experimental analyses, comparing congestive heart failure patients and controls subjects, show that bubble entropy outperforms other popular, well established, entropy estimators in discriminating those two groups. Furthermore, machine learning-based feature ranking and experiments show that bubble entropy serves as a valuable source of features for AI decision-support algorithms.</p>","PeriodicalId":13073,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics","volume":"PP ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2025.3593153","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bubble entropy is a recently proposed entropy metric. Having certain advantages over popular definitions, bubble entropy finds its place in the research community map. It belongs to the family of entropy estimators which embed the signal into an m-dimensional space. Two are the main drawbacks for which those methods are criticized: the high computational cost and the dependence on parameters. Bubble entropy can be an answer to both, since computation can be performed in linear time and the dependence on parameters can be considered minimal in many practical situations. Popular entropy definitions, which are built over an embedding of the signal, mainly rely on two parameters: the size of the embedding space m and a tolerance r, which set a threshold over the distance between two points in the m-dimensional space to be considered similar. Bubble entropy totally eliminates the necessity to define a threshold distance, while it largely decouples the entropy estimation from the selection of the actual size of the embedding space in stationary conditions. Bubble entropy is compared to popular entropy definitions on theoretical and experimental basis. Theoretical analyses reveal significant advantages. Experimental analyses, comparing congestive heart failure patients and controls subjects, show that bubble entropy outperforms other popular, well established, entropy estimators in discriminating those two groups. Furthermore, machine learning-based feature ranking and experiments show that bubble entropy serves as a valuable source of features for AI decision-support algorithms.

关于气泡熵的探讨。
气泡熵是最近提出的熵度量。与流行的定义相比,气泡熵具有一定的优势,它在研究社区地图上找到了自己的位置。它属于将信号嵌入到m维空间的熵估计器族。这些方法的两个主要缺点是:高计算成本和对参数的依赖。气泡熵可以回答这两个问题,因为计算可以在线性时间内执行,并且在许多实际情况下对参数的依赖可以被认为是最小的。流行的熵定义是建立在信号的嵌入上的,主要依赖于两个参数:嵌入空间的大小m和容差r,它在m维空间中两点之间的距离上设置了一个阈值,被认为是相似的。气泡熵完全消除了定义阈值距离的必要性,同时它在很大程度上将熵估计与平稳条件下嵌入空间的实际大小的选择解耦。在理论和实验的基础上,将气泡熵与流行的熵定义进行了比较。理论分析揭示了显著的优势。实验分析,比较充血性心力衰竭患者和对照组,表明气泡熵优于其他流行的,完善的,熵估计在区分这两个组。此外,基于机器学习的特征排序和实验表明,气泡熵是人工智能决策支持算法的有价值的特征来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS-COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
6.50%
发文量
1151
期刊介绍: IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics publishes original papers presenting recent advances where information and communication technologies intersect with health, healthcare, life sciences, and biomedicine. Topics include acquisition, transmission, storage, retrieval, management, and analysis of biomedical and health information. The journal covers applications of information technologies in healthcare, patient monitoring, preventive care, early disease diagnosis, therapy discovery, and personalized treatment protocols. It explores electronic medical and health records, clinical information systems, decision support systems, medical and biological imaging informatics, wearable systems, body area/sensor networks, and more. Integration-related topics like interoperability, evidence-based medicine, and secure patient data are also addressed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信