Inequities in Stroke Recovery: Examining Sociodemographic Predictors of Rehabilitation Success.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Suzana Dedijer Dujović, Olivera Djordjević, Aleksandra Vidaković, Sindi Mitrović, Mirko Grajić, Tijana Dimkić Tomić, Stefan Rosić, Ana Radić, Ljubica Konstantinović
{"title":"Inequities in Stroke Recovery: Examining Sociodemographic Predictors of Rehabilitation Success.","authors":"Suzana Dedijer Dujović, Olivera Djordjević, Aleksandra Vidaković, Sindi Mitrović, Mirko Grajić, Tijana Dimkić Tomić, Stefan Rosić, Ana Radić, Ljubica Konstantinović","doi":"10.3390/healthcare13141739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Stroke recovery is influenced not only by clinical but also sociodemographic factors (SDFs). However, data on how variables such as age, sex, marital status, education, and employment status affect rehabilitation outcomes remain limited, particularly in structured inpatient settings. This study aimed to analyze the impact of key SDFs on functional recovery after stroke. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective cohort of 289 stroke patients undergoing structured inpatient rehabilitation was analyzed. Functional status was assessed at admission, after three weeks, and at discharge using five standardized outcomes: gait speed (primary outcome), Barthel Index, Berg Balance Scale, Action Research Arm Test, and Ashworth scale. Repeated measures ANOVA and multivariable logistic regression were used to evaluate within-subject changes and associations with SDFs. <b>Results:</b> The cohort consisted predominantly of middle-aged to older adults (58% female, 62% married, 60% retired, 60% with primary education or less). Most patients (88%) had ischemic strokes of moderate severity. Significant improvements were observed across all functional measures. Employed, married, younger, and male patients achieved better outcomes. Interaction models indicated that older and female patients with moderate stroke severity demonstrated greater improvement than younger and male counterparts with milder strokes. Mean gait speed increased by +0.32 m/s, exceeding the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of 0.16 m/s. <b>Conclusions:</b> Age, sex, marital status, education, and employment status are relevant predictors of stroke rehabilitation outcomes. These findings emphasize the importance of incorporating sociodemographic profiles into individualized rehabilitation planning to optimize functional recovery and reduce disparities among stroke survivors.</p>","PeriodicalId":12977,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare","volume":"13 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12294742/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13141739","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Stroke recovery is influenced not only by clinical but also sociodemographic factors (SDFs). However, data on how variables such as age, sex, marital status, education, and employment status affect rehabilitation outcomes remain limited, particularly in structured inpatient settings. This study aimed to analyze the impact of key SDFs on functional recovery after stroke. Methods: A retrospective cohort of 289 stroke patients undergoing structured inpatient rehabilitation was analyzed. Functional status was assessed at admission, after three weeks, and at discharge using five standardized outcomes: gait speed (primary outcome), Barthel Index, Berg Balance Scale, Action Research Arm Test, and Ashworth scale. Repeated measures ANOVA and multivariable logistic regression were used to evaluate within-subject changes and associations with SDFs. Results: The cohort consisted predominantly of middle-aged to older adults (58% female, 62% married, 60% retired, 60% with primary education or less). Most patients (88%) had ischemic strokes of moderate severity. Significant improvements were observed across all functional measures. Employed, married, younger, and male patients achieved better outcomes. Interaction models indicated that older and female patients with moderate stroke severity demonstrated greater improvement than younger and male counterparts with milder strokes. Mean gait speed increased by +0.32 m/s, exceeding the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of 0.16 m/s. Conclusions: Age, sex, marital status, education, and employment status are relevant predictors of stroke rehabilitation outcomes. These findings emphasize the importance of incorporating sociodemographic profiles into individualized rehabilitation planning to optimize functional recovery and reduce disparities among stroke survivors.

脑卒中康复中的不公平:检查康复成功的社会人口学预测因素。
背景:脑卒中恢复不仅受临床因素的影响,还受社会人口因素(SDFs)的影响。然而,关于年龄、性别、婚姻状况、教育程度和就业状况等变量如何影响康复结果的数据仍然有限,特别是在结构化住院环境中。本研究旨在分析关键sdf对脑卒中后功能恢复的影响。方法:对289例接受有组织住院康复治疗的脑卒中患者进行回顾性队列分析。在入院时、三周后和出院时,使用五种标准化结果评估功能状态:步态速度(主要结果)、Barthel指数、Berg平衡量表、行动研究臂测试和Ashworth量表。使用重复测量方差分析和多变量逻辑回归来评估受试者内部变化及其与sdf的关联。结果:该队列主要由中老年成年人组成(58%为女性,62%为已婚,60%为退休,60%为初等教育或以下)。大多数患者(88%)为中度缺血性卒中。在所有功能测量中观察到显著的改进。有工作的、已婚的、年轻的和男性患者取得了更好的结果。相互作用模型表明,老年和女性中度中风患者比年轻和男性轻度中风患者表现出更大的改善。平均步态速度增加+0.32 m/s,超过最小临床重要差异(MCID) 0.16 m/s。结论:年龄、性别、婚姻状况、教育程度和就业状况是脑卒中康复预后的相关预测因素。这些发现强调了将社会人口统计资料纳入个性化康复计划的重要性,以优化功能恢复并减少中风幸存者之间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Healthcare
Healthcare Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal (free for readers), which publishes original theoretical and empirical work in the interdisciplinary area of all aspects of medicine and health care research. Healthcare publishes Original Research Articles, Reviews, Case Reports, Research Notes and Short Communications. We encourage researchers to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. For theoretical papers, full details of proofs must be provided so that the results can be checked; for experimental papers, full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Additionally, electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculations, experimental procedure, etc., can be deposited along with the publication as “Supplementary Material”.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信