{"title":"Turkish Validity and Reliability Study of the Short Version of the Questionnaire for Assessing the Childbirth Experience (QACE).","authors":"Cevriye Emir, Candan Ozturk","doi":"10.3390/healthcare13141743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> The mother's birth experience is crucial in identifying her care needs. The \"Questionnaire for Assessing the Childbirth Experience\" (QACE) consists of four subscales designed to assess a mother's childbirth experience. However, psychometric evaluations of the QACE have not been conducted in Turkey. This study aims to adapt and assess the validity and reliability of the \"Questionnaire for Assessing the Childbirth Experience\" short version for the Turkish maternal population. <b>Methods:</b> This methodological study included 205 mothers who gave birth in a public hospital. Data were collected using an Introductory Information Form and the Questionnaire for Assessing the Childbirth Experience (QACE). <b>Results:</b> The content validity index (CVI) for Item 9 was calculated as 0.875, while the remaining 12 items obtained a CVI of 1.00. The internal consistency of the scale, as measured by Cronbach's alpha coefficient (α = 0.758), indicated an acceptable level of reliability across all items. During the Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), one item (Item 13) was excluded due to cross-loading. The remaining 12 items were grouped into four distinct subscales. <b>Conclusions:</b> The short version of the QACE demonstrates acceptable psychometric properties and serves as a valid and reliable instrument for assessing childbirth experiences among Turkish women.</p>","PeriodicalId":12977,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare","volume":"13 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12296193/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13141743","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The mother's birth experience is crucial in identifying her care needs. The "Questionnaire for Assessing the Childbirth Experience" (QACE) consists of four subscales designed to assess a mother's childbirth experience. However, psychometric evaluations of the QACE have not been conducted in Turkey. This study aims to adapt and assess the validity and reliability of the "Questionnaire for Assessing the Childbirth Experience" short version for the Turkish maternal population. Methods: This methodological study included 205 mothers who gave birth in a public hospital. Data were collected using an Introductory Information Form and the Questionnaire for Assessing the Childbirth Experience (QACE). Results: The content validity index (CVI) for Item 9 was calculated as 0.875, while the remaining 12 items obtained a CVI of 1.00. The internal consistency of the scale, as measured by Cronbach's alpha coefficient (α = 0.758), indicated an acceptable level of reliability across all items. During the Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), one item (Item 13) was excluded due to cross-loading. The remaining 12 items were grouped into four distinct subscales. Conclusions: The short version of the QACE demonstrates acceptable psychometric properties and serves as a valid and reliable instrument for assessing childbirth experiences among Turkish women.
期刊介绍:
Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal (free for readers), which publishes original theoretical and empirical work in the interdisciplinary area of all aspects of medicine and health care research. Healthcare publishes Original Research Articles, Reviews, Case Reports, Research Notes and Short Communications. We encourage researchers to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. For theoretical papers, full details of proofs must be provided so that the results can be checked; for experimental papers, full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Additionally, electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculations, experimental procedure, etc., can be deposited along with the publication as “Supplementary Material”.