Assessing an Outdoor Office Work Intervention: Exploring the Relevance of Measuring Frequency, Perceived Stress, Quality of Life and Connectedness to Nature.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Outdoor office work (OOW) has been shown to promote health and well-being and to reduce stress. However, few empirical studies have examined research-based, simple approaches to implementing OOW. In preparation for a larger study, we conducted a feasibility study focusing on limited efficacy testing of potentially relevant outcomes for future OOW research. Methods: The simple Pop Out OOW programme consists of three workshops and access to online tutorials designed to support employees in transitioning relevant everyday office tasks outdoors. Before and after a 12-week intervention, employees from five small- and medium-sized Danish companies (N = 70) reported their weekly number of days including OOW, connectedness to nature (CNS and INS), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), and well-being (WHO-5) scores. Results: At baseline, higher CNS scores were associated with a greater number of days including OOW per week (r = 0.25, p = 0.020). Following the intervention, participants reported a significant increase in the number of days per week with OOW (p < 0.01, d = 0.65). CNS scores also increased significantly (p = 0.019, d = 0.32). No significant changes were observed in stress or well-being scores across the entire sample. However, participants with PSS scores exceeding a national Danish criterion for high stress (n = 11) exhibited a significant and substantial reduction in perceived stress (p < 0.01, d = 1.00). Conclusions: Days including OOW, along with PSS and CNS scores, may serve as relevant outcome measures in future studies evaluating interventions aimed at promoting OOW. These outcomes should be assessed in larger and more diverse and controlled samples to establish generalisability.