A Comparison of Developmental Profiles of Preschool Children with Down Syndrome, Global Developmental Delay, and Developmental Language Disorder.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Mónica-Alba Ahulló-Fuster, M Luz Sánchez-Sánchez, Alejandro Monterrubio-Gordón, Maria-Arantzazu Ruescas-Nicolau
{"title":"A Comparison of Developmental Profiles of Preschool Children with Down Syndrome, Global Developmental Delay, and Developmental Language Disorder.","authors":"Mónica-Alba Ahulló-Fuster, M Luz Sánchez-Sánchez, Alejandro Monterrubio-Gordón, Maria-Arantzazu Ruescas-Nicolau","doi":"10.3390/healthcare13141684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> Developmental disabilities substantially affect the daily lives of children and their families. Although interest in examining the developmental profiles of children with various disabilities has grown, few studies have systematically compared them. This study aimed to characterize the developmental profiles of preschool-aged children with different disabilities. It was hypothesized that developmental profiles would differ depending on the type of developmental disability. <b>Methods</b>: A cross-sectional study was conducted. Scores on the Battelle<sup>®</sup> Developmental Inventory, 2nd Edition (BDI-2) were retrieved for a non-probabilistic convenience sample of 46 children diagnosed with Down syndrome (DS) (<i>n</i> = 22), global developmental delay (GDD) (<i>n</i> = 17), and developmental language disorder (DLD) (<i>n</i> = 7) upon completion of an early intervention program. Developmental quotients (DQs) for the overall BDI-2 and for each domain were determined. <b>Results</b>: The children's mean age was 42.39 ± 5.23 months (range: 30-57). Significant differences were observed among groups with regard to global DQ and all domain-specific DQs (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.01). The GDD group demonstrated the highest DQs across all domains and globally, in comparison to the other groups. Conversely, children with DS had substantially lower DQs across all domains and globally compared to those with GDD, and in the motor and communication domains compared to children with DLD. <b>Conclusions</b>: These findings underscore the importance of early intervention strategies to improve communication in children with DS and highlight the need for regular assessments to monitor progress and identify potential limitations, particularly during the preschool-to-school transition. Additionally, specialists should advise parents of children with DLD to adopt specific behaviors that support the development of their children's social, adaptive, and language skills.</p>","PeriodicalId":12977,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare","volume":"13 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12294726/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13141684","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Developmental disabilities substantially affect the daily lives of children and their families. Although interest in examining the developmental profiles of children with various disabilities has grown, few studies have systematically compared them. This study aimed to characterize the developmental profiles of preschool-aged children with different disabilities. It was hypothesized that developmental profiles would differ depending on the type of developmental disability. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted. Scores on the Battelle® Developmental Inventory, 2nd Edition (BDI-2) were retrieved for a non-probabilistic convenience sample of 46 children diagnosed with Down syndrome (DS) (n = 22), global developmental delay (GDD) (n = 17), and developmental language disorder (DLD) (n = 7) upon completion of an early intervention program. Developmental quotients (DQs) for the overall BDI-2 and for each domain were determined. Results: The children's mean age was 42.39 ± 5.23 months (range: 30-57). Significant differences were observed among groups with regard to global DQ and all domain-specific DQs (p ≤ 0.01). The GDD group demonstrated the highest DQs across all domains and globally, in comparison to the other groups. Conversely, children with DS had substantially lower DQs across all domains and globally compared to those with GDD, and in the motor and communication domains compared to children with DLD. Conclusions: These findings underscore the importance of early intervention strategies to improve communication in children with DS and highlight the need for regular assessments to monitor progress and identify potential limitations, particularly during the preschool-to-school transition. Additionally, specialists should advise parents of children with DLD to adopt specific behaviors that support the development of their children's social, adaptive, and language skills.

学龄前唐氏综合症、整体发育迟缓和发展性语言障碍儿童发育特征的比较
背景/目的:发育障碍严重影响儿童及其家庭的日常生活。尽管人们对研究各种残疾儿童的发展概况越来越感兴趣,但很少有研究对它们进行系统的比较。本研究旨在探讨不同残疾学龄前儿童的发育特征。据推测,发育特征会因发育障碍的类型而异。方法:采用横断面研究。在完成早期干预计划后,对46名被诊断为唐氏综合症(DS) (n = 22)、全面发育迟缓(GDD) (n = 17)和发展性语言障碍(DLD) (n = 7)的儿童进行非概率方便样本的Battelle®发育量表第二版(BDI-2)得分检索。测定总体BDI-2和各结构域的发育商数(DQs)。结果:患儿平均年龄为42.39±5.23个月(范围:30 ~ 57)。各组间总体DQ和各区域特异性DQ差异有统计学意义(p≤0.01)。与其他组相比,GDD组在所有领域和全球范围内都显示出最高的dq。相反,与GDD儿童相比,DS儿童在所有领域和整体上的dq都要低得多,在运动和沟通领域也比DLD儿童低得多。结论:这些发现强调了早期干预策略对改善退行性残疾儿童沟通的重要性,并强调了定期评估以监测进展和识别潜在限制的必要性,特别是在学前到学校的过渡阶段。此外,专家应该建议患有DLD儿童的父母采取具体的行为来支持他们孩子的社会、适应和语言技能的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Healthcare
Healthcare Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal (free for readers), which publishes original theoretical and empirical work in the interdisciplinary area of all aspects of medicine and health care research. Healthcare publishes Original Research Articles, Reviews, Case Reports, Research Notes and Short Communications. We encourage researchers to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. For theoretical papers, full details of proofs must be provided so that the results can be checked; for experimental papers, full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Additionally, electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculations, experimental procedure, etc., can be deposited along with the publication as “Supplementary Material”.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信