Venous thromboembolisms and stroke risk in patients with atrial fibrillation: a nationwide cohort study.

IF 7.4 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Europace Pub Date : 2025-07-29 DOI:10.1093/europace/euaf155
Eero Jalli, Jussi Jaakkola, Ville Langén, K E Juhani Airaksinen, Olli Halminen, Jukka Putaala, Pirjo Mustonen, Jari Haukka, Juha Hartikainen, Miika Linna, Elis Kouki, Mika Lehto, Konsta Teppo
{"title":"Venous thromboembolisms and stroke risk in patients with atrial fibrillation: a nationwide cohort study.","authors":"Eero Jalli, Jussi Jaakkola, Ville Langén, K E Juhani Airaksinen, Olli Halminen, Jukka Putaala, Pirjo Mustonen, Jari Haukka, Juha Hartikainen, Miika Linna, Elis Kouki, Mika Lehto, Konsta Teppo","doi":"10.1093/europace/euaf155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Little is known about the association of venous thromboembolisms (VTEs) on the risk of ischemic stroke (IS) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Nevertheless, both pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep venous thromboembolism (DVT) are often included in the calculation of the CHA2DS2-VASc score, which is used for stroke risk stratification. Therefore, we conducted this nationwide retrospective cohort study to evaluate whether a history of VTE is associated with an increased risk of IS in patients with AF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Finnish AntiCoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation (FinACAF) registry-linkage study includes all patients in Finland with incident AF from 2007 to 2018. IS rates and rate ratios were computed for patients with and without a history of VTE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 271,500 patients with new-onset AF, of whom 4.6% had prior VTE, while 1.9% had a history of PE and 3.1% a history of DVT. The crude incidence of IS was slightly higher in patients with a history of VTE compared to patients without a history of VTE, but after adjusting for baseline factors, VTE was not associated with the rate of IS [adjusted incidence rate ratio (IRR) with 95% confidence interval for any VTE 1.05 (0.98-1.13), for PE 1.01 (0.91-1.13) and for DVT 1.09 (1.00-1.18)]. There was no temporal change in these associations during the study period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A history of VTEs was not associated with an increased risk of IS, suggesting that they do not need to be considered in the stroke risk stratification of patients with AF.</p>","PeriodicalId":11981,"journal":{"name":"Europace","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Europace","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euaf155","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Little is known about the association of venous thromboembolisms (VTEs) on the risk of ischemic stroke (IS) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Nevertheless, both pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep venous thromboembolism (DVT) are often included in the calculation of the CHA2DS2-VASc score, which is used for stroke risk stratification. Therefore, we conducted this nationwide retrospective cohort study to evaluate whether a history of VTE is associated with an increased risk of IS in patients with AF.

Methods: The Finnish AntiCoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation (FinACAF) registry-linkage study includes all patients in Finland with incident AF from 2007 to 2018. IS rates and rate ratios were computed for patients with and without a history of VTE.

Results: We identified 271,500 patients with new-onset AF, of whom 4.6% had prior VTE, while 1.9% had a history of PE and 3.1% a history of DVT. The crude incidence of IS was slightly higher in patients with a history of VTE compared to patients without a history of VTE, but after adjusting for baseline factors, VTE was not associated with the rate of IS [adjusted incidence rate ratio (IRR) with 95% confidence interval for any VTE 1.05 (0.98-1.13), for PE 1.01 (0.91-1.13) and for DVT 1.09 (1.00-1.18)]. There was no temporal change in these associations during the study period.

Conclusion: A history of VTEs was not associated with an increased risk of IS, suggesting that they do not need to be considered in the stroke risk stratification of patients with AF.

心房颤动患者的静脉血栓栓塞和卒中风险:一项全国性队列研究。
背景和目的:关于房颤(AF)患者静脉血栓栓塞(vte)与缺血性卒中(is)风险的关系知之甚少。然而,肺栓塞(PE)和深静脉血栓栓塞(DVT)经常被包括在CHA2DS2-VASc评分的计算中,该评分用于卒中风险分层。因此,我们进行了这项全国性的回顾性队列研究,以评估静脉血栓栓塞史是否与房颤患者发生is的风险增加有关。方法:芬兰房颤抗凝(FinACAF)登记关联研究包括2007年至2018年芬兰所有发生房颤的患者。计算有静脉血栓栓塞史和无静脉血栓栓塞史患者的静脉血栓栓塞率和发生率比。结果:我们确定了271,500例新发房颤患者,其中4.6%有静脉血栓栓塞病史,1.9%有肺动脉栓塞病史,3.1%有静脉血栓栓塞病史。有静脉血栓栓塞病史的患者的IS粗发生率略高于无静脉血栓栓塞病史的患者,但在调整基线因素后,静脉血栓栓塞与IS发生率无相关性[调整后的发病率比(IRR)为95%可信区间,任何静脉血栓栓塞为1.05 (0.98-1.13),PE为1.01 (0.91-1.13),DVT为1.09(1.00-1.18)]。在研究期间,这些关联没有时间变化。结论:静脉血栓栓塞史与IS风险增加无关,提示在房颤患者卒中风险分层中不需要考虑静脉血栓栓塞史。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Europace
Europace 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
8.20%
发文量
851
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: EP - Europace - European Journal of Pacing, Arrhythmias and Cardiac Electrophysiology of the European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology. The journal aims to provide an avenue of communication of top quality European and international original scientific work and reviews in the fields of Arrhythmias, Pacing and Cellular Electrophysiology. The Journal offers the reader a collection of contemporary original peer-reviewed papers, invited papers and editorial comments together with book reviews and correspondence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信